ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the curative effects of two different approaches in the surgical treatmentof small breast.Methods Fourty-seven patients with small breast were treated at our department.Twenty-eight sides of patients adopted an approach of prosthesis while the nineteen sides of patients were treated in the approach of autologous fat granules injection.Clinical assessment was done by analyzing operation time,blood loss volume,hospitalization duration and recent and long-term complications in breasts.All the pa-tients were followed up for thirty-two months on average.Results During follow-up period the appearance ofbreast was satisfied.Silicone gel breast prosthesis was well tolerated and the whole operation time was about (35±5 )min,the amount of blood loss was (35±5 ) mL,hospitalization duration was (2±1 ) days,during thefollow-up period prosthesis capsular contracture after hematoma occurred in one patient.The use of autolo-gous fat granules injection to breast augmentation was found limited,and the whole operate time was about (35±5 ) rain,the amount of blood loss was (15±5 ) mL,hospitalization duration was (1±1 ) days.With in-jection(2±l)times.During the follow-up period,one patient had infection,one patient liquefied fat,andone patient the induration.Conclusion Each treatment approach has its own advantages and disadvanta-ges.The approprite one should be selected according to the special situation of patients.