ABSTRACT
[Objective]To analyse and research quality of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) Ph.D. thesis,based on Zhejiang Chinese Medical University. [Methods] The investigation and analysis were statistically carried out on major,category,literature reference,fund support,methods,and blind trial review of TCM Ph.D. thesis in our university from 2012 to 2016.[Results] For major,compared with traditional Chinese medicine, combination of Chinese traditional and western medicine and Chinese materia medica show significant difference( P<0.01); Compared with Chinese materia medica,traditional Chinese medicine shows significant difference(P<0.01), combination of Chinese traditional and western medicine shows no difference(P>0.05).For category, compared with applied research,basic research and comprehensive research show significant difference(P<0.01); Compared with comprehensive research, applied research shows significant difference(P<0.01) and basic research shows difference(P<0.05).For funds, compared without project support,project support shows significant difference(P<0.01).[Conclusion]Majors are not balanced in our university,and training objectives should be in accordance with the needs of the society; The categories show great differences, and the research methods should be combined with the actual project; Sources should be diversified.