Navafenterol, a new drug for the treatment of chronic obstructive airway disease / 中国临床药理学与治疗学

Navafenterol is a new compound with both muscarinic receptor antagonist and β2 receptor agonist effects in a single molecule, who is being developed for the treatment of chronic obstructive airway disease such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma. These pilot clinical studies found that it can significantly improve lung function and symptoms, and is safe and well tolerated. Common treatment emergent adverse events include headache, nasopharyngitis, and dizziness. It may become a next-generation bronchodilator for chronic obstructive airway disease. This review introduced the prospective of Navafenterol.

Overprescription of short-acting β2 agonists: reflections from the SABINA study in Brazil / Prescrição excessiva de β2-agonistas de curta duração: reflexões a partir do estudo SABINA no Brasil

ABSTRACT Objective: To assess prescription patterns for short-acting b2 agonists (SABAs) and other asthma medications in asthma patients treated by specialists and participating in the SABA use IN Asthma (SABINA) study in Brazil. Methods: This was an observational, cross-sectional study conducted at five sites in different regions of Brazil. The primary endpoints were to record SABA prescriptions and obtain data on over-the-counter (OTC) SABA purchases at the pharmacy. Results: Data on 218 asthma patients were analyzed. Of those 218 patients, 80.3% were prescribed SABAs in addition to their maintenance therapy, with a mean of 11.2 SABA canisters in the previous 12 months. Of those patients, 71.4% were prescribed ≥ 3 canisters and 42.2% were prescribed ≥ 10 canisters. None of the patients were prescribed SABA monotherapy. A total of 14.2% of the patients reported purchasing SABAs OTC at a pharmacy without a prescription. Of those, 48.4% purchased ≥ 3 SABA canisters. A fixed-dose combination of an inhaled corticosteroid and a long-acting b2 agonist was prescribed to 95.0% of the patients. In the year before the study visit, 45.0% of the patients received at least one course of oral corticosteroid burst treatment. Asthma was well controlled in 43.1% of the patients, partly controlled in 34.9%, and uncontrolled in 22.0%. Patients reported a mean of 1.1 severe asthma exacerbations, with 49.1% experiencing 1 or more severe exacerbations. Conclusions: Overprescription and OTC purchases of SABAs are common in Brazil, possibly leading to the need for courses of oral corticosteroids. The health care community should collaborate to implement evidence-based recommendations and promote health education to improve asthma management in Brazil.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar os padrões de prescrição de short-acting b2 agonists (SABAs, b2-agonistas de curta duração) e outros medicamentos para asma em pacientes tratados por especialistas e participantes do estudo SABA use IN Asthma (SABINA) no Brasil. Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo transversal observacional realizado em cinco locais em diferentes regiões do Brasil. Os desfechos primários foram registrar as prescrições de SABAs e obter dados a respeito da compra de SABAs sem receita médica na farmácia. Resultados: Foram analisados dados a respeito de 218 pacientes com asma. Dos 218 pacientes, 80,3% receberam prescrição de SABA além da terapia de manutenção, com uma média de 11,2 frascos de SABA nos 12 meses anteriores. Destes, 71,4% receberam prescrição de ≥ 3 frascos e 42,2% receberam prescrição de ≥ 10 frascos. Nenhum dos pacientes recebeu prescrição de monoterapia com SABA. Do total de pacientes, 14,2% relataram que compraram SABAs sem receita médica na farmácia. Destes, 48,4% compraram ≥ 3 frascos de SABA. Foram prescritas doses fixas combinadas de corticosteroide inalatório e b2-agonista de longa duração para 95,0% dos pacientes. No ano anterior à visita do estudo, 45,0% dos pacientes receberam pelo menos um ciclo de tratamento de curta duração com corticosteroide oral. A asma estava bem controlada em 43,1% dos pacientes, parcialmente controlada em 34,9% e não controlada em 22,0%. Os pacientes relataram uma média de 1,1 exacerbações graves da asma, sendo que 49,1% apresentaram uma ou mais exacerbações graves. Conclusões: A prescrição excessiva e a compra de SABAs sem receita médica são comuns no Brasil e possivelmente levam à necessidade de uso de corticosteroides orais. A comunidade de profissionais de saúde deve colaborar para implantar recomendações baseadas em evidências e promover a educação em saúde para melhorar o manejo da asma no Brasil.

Uso de inhaladores para la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica en un grupo de pacientes colombianos

Introducción: En Colombia son escasos los datos sobre el uso de los inhaladores en pacientes con EPOC. Objetivo: Describir la técnica de uso de inhaladores de dosis medida y polvo seco en pacientes de un hospital colombiano. Materiales y métodos: Estudio descriptivo en pacientes mayores de 40 años con EPOC atendidos en un hospital en La Virginia, Risaralda, Colombia, entre el 1 de septiembre de 2019 al 31 de enero de 2020. La unidad de análisis fueron los pacientes. Se incluyeron variables sociodemográficas, clínicas y lista de chequeo para uso de inhaladores. Se aplicaron frecuencias y proporciones para variables discretas, estadísticas de tendencia central y dispersión para variables continuas. Resultados: Se incluyeron 104 pacientes con edad media de 73,6 ± 10,1 años; 57 eran mujeres (54,8 %). Además, 48 pacientes estaban clasificados como GOLD-D (46,2 %). Igualmente, 89 pacientes manifestaron haber recibido educación sobre el uso de broncodilatadores (85,6 %). Los más frecuentes fueron los inhaladores de dosis medida (DM) en 95 casos (91,3 %), seguido de los de polvo seco unidosis (7,7 %). Así mismo, 37 pacientes que usaron DM sin inhalocámara (35,6 %) no cumplieron los pasos de la lista de chequeo. En el sistema multidosis, el más realizado fue cerrar de manera adecuada el inhalador y el menos ejecutado, expulsar el aire lentamente evitando hacerlo cerca del inhalador (n = 6; 5,7 %). Discusión: Se lograron describir las características de la técnica de uso de los inhaladores en pacientes con EPOC. A pesar de que ningún paciente logró utilizar el inhalador de forma "perfecta", la mayoría han recibido educación por parte de los profesionales de la salud. Conclusión: Un alto porcentaje de pacientes usa inadecuadamente los dispositivos para suministrar los broncodilatadores. Esto puede impactar negativamente en el control de la enfermedad.

Introduction: In Colombia, there is limited data on the use of inhalers in patients with COPD. Objective: The objective was to describe the technique of using metered-dose inhalers and dry powder in patients in a Colombian hospital. Methods: Observational, descriptive study of patients over 40 years of age with COPD, treated in a hospital in La Virginia, Risaralda, Colombia, between September 1st, 2019 and January 31st, 2020. The unit of analysis were patients in consultation. Sociodemographic and clinical variables, and a checklist for use of inhalers were included. Frequencies and proportions were applied for discrete variables, statistics of central tendency and dispersion for continuous variables. Results: A total of 104 patients with an average age of 73.6 ± 10.1 years were included; 57 were women (54.8%). In addition, 48 patients were classified as GOLD-D (46.2%). Similarly, 89 patients reported having received education on the use of bronchodilators (85.6%). The most common were metered-dose (MD) inhalers in 95 cases (91.3%), followed by single-dose dry powder inhalers in eight patients (7.7%). Likewise, 37 patients who used DM without inhalochamber (35.6%) did not comply with the steps of the checklist. In the multidose system, the most performed was to properly close the inhaler and the least performed was to expel the air slowly, avoiding doing so near the inhaler (n=6; 5.7%). Discussion: The characteristics of the technique of using inhalers in patients with COPD were described. Although no patient was able to use the inhaler "perfectly", most have received education from health professionals. Conclusion: A high percentage of patients misuse the devices to deliver bronchodilators. This can negatively impact the control of the disease.

Caracterización del asma grave no controlada en adultos mayores de 60 años

Introducción: Los pacientes mayores de 60 años suelen tener un asma más grave, menos controlada y peor función pulmonar que los jóvenes. Objetivo: Caracterizar a los pacientes mayores de 60 años con asma grave no controlada. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional descriptivo, prospectivo y transversal en el Hospital Neumológico Benéfico Jurídico en el período comprendido entre enero del 2020 y enero del 2021. Resultados: Edad predominante 60-69 años (76,5 %). Mujeres (61,8 %). Antecedentes familiares de asma o alergia (64,7 %). Asma de larga evolución (85,3 %). Asma asociada a obesidad y mal control (55,9 %). Reversibilidad del VEF1 (volumen espiratorio forzado en el primer segundo) después de la aplicación del broncodilatador (26,5 %). Adherencia al tratamiento (61,8 %). El riesgo futuro de resultados adversos fue bajo en el 58,8 %, es el principal factor, el mal control actual en el 100 %. Conclusiones: El asma grave no controlada en mayores de 60 años es más frecuente en el sexo femenino, los pacientes suelen tener antecedentes familiares de asma o alergia, presentar asma de larga evolución, obesidad asociada al mal control, disminución de la reversibilidad del VEF1 con la aplicación del broncodilatador, mala adherencia al tratamiento y el mal control actual como riesgo futuro de la enfermedad.

Introduction: Patients older than 60 years tend to have more severe, less controlled asthma and worse lung function than younger people. Objective: To characterize patients older than 60 years with severe uncontrolled asthma. Methods: A descriptive, prospective and cross-sectional observational study was carried out at Benéfico Jurídico Pneumological Hospital from January 2020 to January 2021. Results: The age group 60-69 years (76.5%) predominated. Women also predominated (61.8%), as well as family history of asthma or allergy (64.7%), and long-standing asthma (85.3%). Asthma associated with obesity and poor control was 55.9%. The reversibility of the forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) after the application of the bronchodilator was 26.5%. The adherence to treatment was 61.8%. The future risk of adverse results was low (58.8%), which is the main factor, the current poor control in 100%. Conclusions: Severe uncontrolled asthma in people over 60 years of age is more frequent in women, patients usually have family history of asthma or allergy, there is long-term asthma. It was observed that obesity is associated with poor control, the decreased FEV1 reversibility with the application of the bronchodilator, poor adherence to treatment and poor current control as a future risk of the disease.

Función pulmonar: ¿Debemos cambiar la forma de calcular la respuesta broncodilatadora en la espirometría en niños? / Should we change the way we calculate the bronchodilator response in children's spirometry?

Tradicionalmente se ha definido la respuesta broncodilatadora (RB) positiva como una mejoría ≥ de 12 % del VEF1. En el año 2022 se publica una Guía sobre la interpretación de función la pulmonar de la Sociedad Americana de Tórax y la Sociedad Europea de Enfermedades Respiratorias, donde se propone que la RB debe expresarse como el cambio porcentual del VEF1 en relación con el VEF1 predicho y que un cambio ≥ 10 % indica una RB positiva. Las sociedades científicas en Chile están evaluando estas recomendaciones para decidir su adecuada implementación en pediatría.

Traditionally, a positive bronchodilator (BR) response has been defined as a ≥ 12% improvement in FEV1. In the year 2022, a Guide on the interpretation of pulmonary function of the American Thoracic Society and the European Society of Respiratory Diseases was published, where it was proposed that BR should be expressed as the percent change in FEV1 relative to predicted FEV1 and that a change ≥ 10% indicates a positive BR. Scientific societies in Chile are evaluating these recommendations to decide their proper implementation in pediatrics.

Executive Summary of the Recommendations on the Management of Asthma In Primary Care (2022) – New Updates

Background : Asthma is a heterogenous disease defined by the history of respiratory symptoms (shortness of breath, wheezing, cough, and chest tightness) that vary over time and in intensity, along with variable expiratory airflow limitation. Despite an ever-increasing prevalence of asthma across all age groups, this condition remains poorly managed in India. Majority of the Indian patients remain undiagnosed or wrongly diagnosed in general clinical practice and even those who get diagnosed, remain poorly or inadequately treated1,2. Since the last published 2020 Indian Medical Association (IMA) recommendations on the management of asthma in primary care, noteworthy critical changes have been recommended in relation to the diagnosis/management of asthma in international guidelines. Hence, there was a need to update the existing IMA recommendations. For the same, an expert group meeting was organized with family physicians having clinical experience in managing patients with asthma along with chest physicians and pediatricians. Important updates related to asthma diagnosis and its management were discussed and the final recommendation decisions were derived from the joint group discussion. Some of the key points derived from the discussion are mentioned below in the executive summary. For a detailed version of the new recommendations please click on the url.

Association between beta-2 adrenergic receptor variants and clinical outcomes in children and adolescents with acute asthma

ABSTRACT Objective To investigate whether different genotypes of p.Arg16Gly, p.Gln27Glu, p.Arg19Cys and p.Thr164Ile variants interfere in response to treatment in children and adolescents with moderate to severe acute asthma. Methods This sample comprised patients aged 2 to 17 years with a history of at least two wheezing episodes and current moderate to severe asthma exacerbation. All patients received multiple doses of albuterol and ipratropium bromide delivered via pressurized metered-dose inhaler with holding chamber and systemic corticosteroids. Hospital admission was defined as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were changes in forced expiratory volume in the first second after 1 hour of treatment, and for outpatients, length of stay in the emergency room. Variants were genotyped by sequencing. Results A total of 60 patients were evaluated. Hospital admission rates were significantly higher in carriers of the genotype AA relative to those with genotype AG or GG, within the p.Arg16Gly variant (p=0.03, test χ2, alpha=0.05). Secondary outcomes did not differ between genotypes. Conclusion Hospital admission rates were significantly higher among carriers of the genotype AA within the p.Arg16Gly variant. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01323010

Eficácia e segurança de tripla terapia broncodilatadora comparada à dupla terapia em DPOC grave: revisão rápida de evidências / Effectiveness and safety of triple bronchodilator therapy compared to dual therapy in severe COPD: rapid response review of evidence

Tecnologia: Tripla terapia broncodilatadora (vilanterol/ umeclidínio/ fluticasona, formoterol/ glicopirrônio/ beclometasona) e dupla terapia. Indicação: Tratamento de doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica (DPOC), formas grave e muito grave. Pergunta: Há diferenças de efeito nos principais desfechos de eficácia e segurança entre a tripla terapia broncodilatadora e as duplas terapias no tratamento de pacientes com DPOC, formas grave e muito grave? Métodos: Revisão rápida de evidências (overview) de revisões sistemáticas, com levantamento bibliográfico realizado na base de dados PUBMED, utilizando estratégia estruturada de busca. A qualidade metodológica das revisões sistemáticas foi avaliada com AMSTAR-2 (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews). Resultados: Foram selecionadas e incluídas 2 revisões sistemáticas. Conclusão: A tripla terapia broncodilatadora era mais eficaz que a dupla terapia para reduzir a taxa anual de exacerbações moderadas a severas, mas não tinha superioridade para obter ganhos clínicos em outros desfechos (volume expiratório forçado no primeiro segundo, qualidade de vida, índice de dispneia, mortalidade geral, mortalidade respiratória), exceto que a tripla terapia era superior à dupla terapia com agonistas beta-2/ antagonistas antimuscarínicos e similar à dupla terapia com agonistas beta-2/ corticoesteróides inalatórios para reduzir mortalidade. A tripla terapia tinha perfil de segurança similar à dupla terapia, com mesmo risco para eventos adversos e eventos adversos graves. A tripla terapia tinha maior risco para pneumonias que a dupla terapia com agonistas beta-2/ antagonistas antimuscarínicos

Technology: Triple bronchodilator therapy (vilanterol/ umeclidinium/ fluticasone, formoterol/ glycopyrronium/ beclomethasone) and dual therapy. Indication: Treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), severe and very severe forms. Question: Are there differences in effects of efficacy and safety outcomes between triple bronchodilator therapy and dual therapies in treating patients with severe and very severe forms of COPD? Methods: Rapid review of evidence (overview) from systematic reviews, with a bibliographic search in the PUBMED database, using a structured strategy. The methodological quality of systematic reviews was assessed with AMSTAR-2 (Methodological Quality Assessment of Systematic Reviews). Results: Two systematic reviews were selected and included. Conclusion: Triple bronchodilator therapy was more effective than dual therapy in reducing the annual rate of moderate to severe exacerbations, but had no superiority for clinical gains in other outcomes (forced expiratory volume in first second, quality of life, dyspnea index, general mortality, respiratory mortality), except that, for reducing mortality, triple therapy was superior to dual therapy with beta-2 agonists/ antimuscarinic antimuscarinics and similar to dual therapy with beta 2 agonists/ inhaled corticosteroids. The triple therapy had a similar safety profile to dual therapy, with the same risk for adverse events and serious adverse events. The triple therapy had a higher risk for pneumonia than a dual therapy with beta-2 agonists/ antimuscarinic antagonists

Effects of nebulization with high-dose budesonide combined with ipratropium bromide on airway remodeling and mucus secretion in patients with AECOPD / 中国基层医药

Objective:To investigate the effects of nebulization with high-dose budesonide (BUD) combined with ipratropium bromide (IB) on airway remodeling and mucus secretion in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD).Methods:Ninety patients with AECOPD who received treatment in Wenling Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine between January 2020 and June 2021 were included in this study. They were assigned to the conventional-dose group ( n = 45, odd number) and high-dose group ( n = 45, even number) according to the number of admission. In the conventional-dose group, nebulization with IB (0.5 mg administered within 20 minutes, three times daily) and BUD (2 mg administered within 20 minutes, twice daily) was performed. In the high-dose group, nebulization with IB (0.5 mg administered within 20 minutes, three times daily) and BUD (4 mg administered within 20 minutes, twice daily) was performed. After nebulization, a mouthwash was required in each group. After 7 days of treatment, clinical efficacy was compared between the two groups. Before and 7 days after treatment, airway remodeling level (matrix metalloproteinase-9 and interleukin-8), airway mucus secretion (mucin-5ac and neutrophil elastase) and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results:Total response rate in the high-dose group was significantly higher than that in the conventional-dose group [95.56% (43/45) vs. 82.22% (37/45), χ2 = 4.05, P < 0.05]. After 7 days of treatment, serum matrix metalloproteinase-9 and interleukin-8 levels in the high-dose group were (416.96 ± 30.96) μg/L and (6.33 ± 1.03) μg/L, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the conventional-dose group [(452.25 ± 32.16) μg/L, (7.85 ± 1.24) μg/L, t = 5.30, 6.32, both P < 0.001)]. After 7 days of treatment, serum mucin-5ac and neutrophil elastase levels in the high-dose group were (1.33 ± 0.21) μg/L and (4.06 ± 1.03) μg/L, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the conventional-dose group [(1.58 ± 0.23) μg/L, (5.11 ± 1.14) μg/L, t = 5.38, 4.58, both P < 0.001]. There was no significant difference in incidence of adverse reactions between high-dose and conventional-dose groups [8.89% (4/45) vs. 4.44% (2/45), χ2 = 0.71, P > 0.05). Conclusion:Nebulization with high-dose BUD combined with IB for treatment of AECOPD can improve airway remodeling, reduce airway mucus hypersecretion and has definite therapeutic effects. Findings from this study are of great innovation and science.

Effects of aeroallergen sensitization on symptom severity, pulmonary function, and bronchodilator response in children with bronchial asthma

Background@#Allergen sensitization, symptom severity, pulmonary function test, and bronchodilator response are important in the diagnosis and treatment of asthma. However, the relationship between these factors remains unclear.@*Objective@#The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between aeroallergen sensitization and asthma severity, pulmonary function, and bronchodilator response among pediatric patients with bronchial asthma.@*Methods@#This was a prospective study where 155 pediatric patients aged 7–18 years old with bronchial asthma were recruited from Outpatient Clinics. Patients who met the inclusion criteria proceeded with spirometry and aeroallergen skin prick test.@*Results@#There was a significant degree of sensitization, wherein 100% of the patients had sensitization to one or more aeroallergens. Among these children, 106 (68%) were polysensitized. The polysensitized group had more severe and persistent asthma severity profile (p<0.001) and worse pulmonary function (p<0.001). The frequency of abnormal pre-bronchodilator lung function of the polysensitized group was higher than the monosensitized group (p<0.001). A positive bronchodilator response was higher among polysensitized children as compared to monosensitized children (p<0.001). Sensitization to Dermatophagoides farinae, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and dog correlated with impairment of both the large airways and distal small airways while sensitization to cat, cockroach, and horse correlated only with impairment of the large airways (p<0.05). Patients sensitized to D. farinae, D. pteronyssinus, cat and dog had significant bronchodilator response (p<0.05).@*Conclusion@#Polysensitized asthmatic children had a more persistent and severe asthma profile, worse pulmonary function, and higher bronchodilator reversibility compared to the monosensitized group.

Effects of vitamin D3 adjuvant therapy on pulmonary function and airway inflammation in children with bronchial asthma / 中国基层医药

Objective:To investigate the effects of vitamin D3 adjuvant therapy on pulmonary function and airway inflammation in children with bronchial asthma, providing evidence for clinical treatment of bronchial asthma.Methods:100 children with bronchial asthma who received treatment in Xin'an International Hospital from January 2018 to June 2020 were included in this study. They were randomly assigned to receive either conventional treatments (such as bronchodilator and glucocorticoid treatments)(control group, n = 50) or conventional treatment combined with vitamin D3 adjuvant treatment (observation group, n = 50) for 9 days. Clinical efficacy and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Before and after treatment, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1), forced vital capacity (FVC), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin 10 (IL-10), and interleukin-5 (IL-5) levels were compared between the two groups. Results:Total effective rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group [94.00% (47/50) vs. 80.00% (40/50), χ2 = 4.332, P < 0.05]. After treatment, FEV 1 and FVC levels in each group were significantly increased compared with before treatment (both P < 0.05). After treatment, FEV 1 and FVC levels in the observation group were (1.47 ± 0.42) L and (2.09 ± 0.64) L, respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the control group [(1.21 ± 0.34) L, (1.85 ± 0.47) L, t = 2.137, 3.402, both P < 0.05]. After treatment, TNF-α and IL-5 levels in each group were significantly deceased (both P < 0.001), and IL-10 level was significantly increased ( P < 0.001), compared with before treatment in the same group. After treatment, TNF-α and IL-5 levels in the observation group were (0.58 ± 0.13) ng/L and (39.37 ± 3.54) ng/L, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the control group [(0.92 ± 0.23) ng/L, (61.36 ± 5.72) ng/L], t = 9.099, 38.628, both P < 0.001]. After treatment, IL-10 level in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group [(215.62 ± 13.25) ng /L vs. (127.28 ± 9.27) ng/L, t = 23.115, P < 0.001]. Conclusion:Vitamin D3 adjuvant therapy for the treatment of bronchial asthma in children can help promote pulmonary function recovery and reduce airway inflammation, which is worthy of clinical application.

Evaluación de la respuesta aguda al broncodilatador en pacientes asmáticos sobrepesos y obesos / Evaluation of the acute response to the bronchodilator in overweight and obese asthmatic patients

Introducción: La obesidad está asociada al uso frecuente de medicación de rescate y padecer asma de mayor gravedad. Los obesos asmáticos tienen menor reactividad bronquial, sin embargo, existe información limitada sobre la magnitud de la reversibilidad aguda al broncodilatador (RAB). Objetivo: Evaluar la magnitud de respuesta aguda al broncodilatador en pacientes asmáticos sobrepesos y obesos. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo transversal con 49 pacientes asmáticos sobrepesos y obesos atendidos en consulta externa del Hospital Neumológico Benéfico Jurídico (enero 2017˗ enero 2018) y se constató mediante espirometría la respuesta aguda al broncodilatador. Resultados: Predominó la edad (40-59 años), mayor asociación de padecer asma, poca mejoría con la aplicación del broncodilatador. El sexo femenino (20-59 años) presentó mayor número que el masculino y menor reversibilidad al broncodilatador. Los pacientes con antecedentes patológicos familiares de asma o atopia representaron 73,5 por ciento del total. El 76,5 por ciento de los obesos no presentó mejoría con la aplicación del broncodilatador. Predominó la categoría de gravedad persistente moderada. Conclusiones: El sexo femenino tiene más riesgo de padecer asma y no tener mejoría al aplicar el broncodilatador. Los obesos mayores de 40 años tienen mayor riesgo de no presentar reversibilidad aguda al broncodilatador. Los antecedentes patológicos familiares de asma o atopia y personales de otras enfermedades no predisponen a menor reversibilidad aguda al broncodilatador. La gravedad del asma no influye en la reversibilidad aguda al broncodilatador(AU)

Introduction: Obesity is associated with the frequent use of rescue medication and suffering from more severe asthma. Obese asthmatics have less bronchial reactivity, however, there is limited information on the magnitude of acute bronchodilator reversibility. Objective: To assess the magnitude of the acute response to the bronchodilator in overweight and obese asthmatic patients. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out in 49 overweight and obese asthmatic patients seen in the outpatient clinic at Benéfico Jurídico Pneumologic Hospital from January 2017 to January 2018, and the acute response to bronchodilator was verified by spirometry. Results: Age predominated (40-59 years), greater association of suffering from asthma, and little improvement with the use of bronchodilator. The female sex (20-59 years) showed greater number than the male and less reversibility to bronchodilator. Patients with family pathological history of asthma or atopy represented 73.5 percent of the total. 76.5 percent of the obese did not show improvement with the use of bronchodilator. The category of moderate persistent severity predominated. Conclusions: The female sex has greater risk of suffering from asthma and has no improvement when applying bronchodilator. Obese individuals over 40 years of age have higher risk of not having acute reversibility to the bronchodilator. Family pathological history of asthma or atopy and personal history of other diseases do not predispose to less acute reversibility of bronchodilator. The severity of asthma does not influence acute reversibility to bronchodilator(AU)

Utilização da porcentagem e escore Z para avaliar resposta broncodilatadora em crianças asmáticas de idade pré-escolar / Use of percentage and Z-score to evaluate bronchodilator response in preschool asthmatic children

Introdução: A resposta ao broncodilatador (RBD) é frequentemente utilizada no apoio diagnóstico e na tomada de decisões terapêuticas em crianças com sintomas respiratórios. Entretanto, não há um consenso do ponto de corte da RBD em crianças pré-escolares. Objetivo: Avaliar RBD através da porcentagem e do deslocamento do escore Z do volume expiratório forçado em relação ao tempo (VEFt) de crianças asmáticas pré-escolares e propor novos pontos de corte. Métodos: Estudo transversal com 174 espirometrias de crianças asmáticas do ambulatório de alergia/imunologia de hospital de referência nacional no Rio de Janeiro (RJ), realizadas antes e após 15 minutos do uso do broncodilatador, expressas em escore Z e classificadas com padrão obstrutivo quando VEF1/capacidade vital (CV) < -1,645. O poder discriminatório para a RBD dos parâmetros espirométricos foi analisado por curvas ROC, e novos pontos de corte de RBD positiva foram calculados. Resultados: 23,4% apresentou padrão obstrutivo. O índice de Tiffeneau em crianças asmáticas com 3 anos é significativamente menor do que em crianças de 4-6 anos (p = 0,040). VEF0,75 apresentou maior poder discriminatório para RBD (variação > 11% e acurácia > 90%). Os pontos de corte encontrados para as variações percentuais na resposta positiva ao RBD foram 9,5 (VEF1); 13,8 (VEF0,75); 0,6 (escore Z VEF1) e 0,8 (escore Z VEF0,75). Tais pontos de corte refletem altos valores de sensibilidade e especificidade, com valores preditivos positivo e negativo variando em 90%. A conclusão pode ser estendida às variações nos escores Z de VEFt. Conclusões: O VEF0,75 > 11% apresentou melhor discriminação para RBD, demonstrando ser bom parâmetro para a clínica. Os valores encontrados no deslocamento do escore Z após o broncodilatador corroboram com a percepção de que seja um novo recurso para a interpretação da RBD.

Introduction: Bronchodilator response (BDR) is often used to support diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making in children with respiratory symptoms. However, there is no consensus on the BDR cutoff in preschool children. Objective: To evaluate BDR through the percentage and displacement of Z-scores for forced expiratory volume over time (FEVt) of preschool asthmatic children and to propose new cutoff points. Methods: Crosssectional study with 174 spirometry tests of asthmatic children from the allergy/immunology outpatient clinic of a national reference hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, performed before and after 15 min of bronchodilator use, expressed as Z-score and classified as obstructive pattern when forced expiratory volume in 1 minute (FEV1)/vital capacity (VC) < -1,645. The discriminatory power of spirometric parameters to assess BDR was analyzed by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves and new positive BDR cutoff points were calculated. Results: 23.4% presented obstructive pattern. The Tiffeneau index in asthmatic children aged 3 years is significantly lower than that found in children aged 4-6 years (p = 0.040). FEV0.75 presented higher discriminatory power for BDR (variation > 11% and accuracy > 90%). The cutoff points found for percentage changes in positive BDR were 9.5 (FEV1); 13.8 (FEV0.75); 0.6 (FEV1 Z-score) and 0.8 (FEV0.75 Z-score). Such cutoff points reflect high sensitivity and specificity values, with positive and negative predictive values ranging by 90%. The conclusion can be expanded to variations in FEVt Z-scores. Conclusions: FEV0.75 > 11% presented better discrimination for BDR, proving to be a good parameter for clinic practice. The values found in the Z-score displacement after use of bronchodilator corroborate the perception that it is a new resource for the interpretation of BDR.

Study of spirometry parameters in suspected asthmatic children in a tertiary care hospital

Background: Asthma in children is difficult to diagnose due to inability of young children to successfully perform spirometry. However some parameters in the spirometry which are relatively effort independent can be very helpful in confirming the diagnosis of asthma. This study was conducted to find out the most commonly affected spirometry parameter in the suspected cases of childhood asthma.Methods: Total 56 children were studied between 7 to 18 years who came for outpatient visit or admitted in the paediatric ward and were clinically suspected to be asthmatic based on asthma predictive index. They were subjected to spirometry in our institute. Baseline and post bronchodilator values of spirometry parameters were studied and analysed using standard statistical tests.Results: Baseline Forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity (FEF25-75%) was found to be the most commonly affected spirometry parameter in confirming the diagnosis of suspected asthmatics and correlated with the clinical diagnosis of childhood asthma.Conclusions: FEF25-75% can aid in confirming the diagnosis of suspected asthmatic children who are otherwise not treated as asthmatics and remain undiagnosed in view of not meeting the established spirometry criteria for asthma due to poor performance and ignorance of looking at this important and effort independent parameter.

Role of peak expiratory flow rate and chest radiography in children above 5 years of age with acute asthma

Background: Asthma is a heterogeneous disease characterized by cough, wheeze and shortness of breath that vary in intensity and time with variable expiratory airflow limitation, associated with chronic airway inflammation. Aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of Peak Expiratory Flow Rate [PEFR] and oxygen saturation in determining severity of acute asthma, to measure objective change in PEFR and oxygen saturation following bronchodilator therapy and the role of chest X-rays in acute asthma.Methods: A prospective study of 50 children above 5 years with acute asthma who presented to the emergency department in a tertiary care hospital were included. PEFR and oxygen saturation before and after bronchodilator therapy was measured. Indication for chest X-rays, its clinical correlation and change in standard treatment of acute asthma based on X-ray reports was noted.Results: The mean PEFR and PEFR % of expected was lower in severe asthma when compared to moderate asthma and was statistically significant (p<0.001). The % of expected PEFR before salbutamol therapy was 48.78'14.36, which improved significantly to 67.13'14.22 after treatment (p<0.001). Oxygen saturation before and after salbutamol therapy was 94.96 ' 4.11 and 96.96'2.87 respectively with the change being significant (p value <0.001). Chest X-rays were performed in 12 (24%) children as per standard guidelines, of which 1(9%) was abnormal showing right basal consolidation. Chest X-ray correlated with clinical findings in 1 child and the findings on chest X-ray altered the ongoing treatment by addition of antibiotic.Conclusions: PEFR and oxygen saturation is useful in the emergency department to objectively assess the severity of acute asthma and the response to initial bronchodilator therapy. Chest X-rays are not routinely indicated in the standard treatment of acute asthma.

Beta-2 agonistas para el tratamiento de bronquiolitis / Beta-2 agonists for the treatment of bronchiolitis

INTRODUCCIÓN La bronquiolitis es la inflamación aguda de las vías aéreas de pequeño calibre, teniendo como causa principal las infecciones virales. Es altamente frecuente en menores de dos años, sobretodo en menores de 12 meses. Existe gran controversia sobre el manejo de esta patología, siendo especialmente cuestionable el uso de beta-2 agonistas de corta acción tanto en el ámbito ambulatorio como hospitalario. MÉTODOS Para responder esta pregunta utilizamos Epistemonikos, la mayor base de datos de revisiones sistemáticas en salud a nivel mundial, la cual es mantenida mediante búsquedas en múltiples fuentes de información, incluyendo MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, entre otras. Extrajimos los datos desde las revisiones identificadas, reanalizamos los datos de los estudios primarios, realizamos un metanálisis, y preparamos una tabla de resumen de los resultados utilizando el método GRADE. RESULTADOS Y CONCLUSIONES Identificamos siete revisiones sistemáticas que en conjunto incluyen 47 estudios primarios, de los cuales 44 corresponden a ensayos aleatorizados. Concluimos que el uso de beta-2 agonistas podría no tener ningún beneficio en el manejo de la bronquiolitis, en términos de necesidad de hospitalización y/o duración de la misma. Por otra parte, podría aumentar efectos adversos como arritmias, sin embargo, la certeza de esta evidencia es baja

Personalised management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): Malaysian consensus algorithm for appropriate use of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) in COPD patients

@#Background: Regarding the long-term safety issues with the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and the clinical predominance of dual bronchodilators in enhancing treatment outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), ICS is no longer a “preferred therapy” according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease except on top of a dual bronchodilator. This has necessitated a change in the current therapy for many COPD patients. Objective: To determine a standardised algorithm to reassess and personalise the treatment COPD patients based on the available evidence. Methods: A consensus statement was agreed upon by a panel of pulmonologists in from 11 institutes in Malaysia whose members formed this consensus group. Results: According to the consensus, which was unanimously adopted, all COPD patients who are currently receiving an ICS-based treatment should be reassessed based on the presence of co-existence of asthma or high eosinophil counts and frequency of moderate or severe exacerbations in the previous 12 months. When that the patients meet any of the aforementioned criteria, then the patient can continue taking ICS-based therapy. However, if the patients do not meet the criteria, then the treatment of patients need to be personalised based on whether the patient is currently receiving long-acting beta-agonists (LABA)/ICS or triple therapy. Conclusion: A flowchart of the consensus providing a guidance to Malaysian clinicians was elucidated based on evidences and international guidelines that identifies the right patients who should receive inhaled corticosteroids and enable to switch non ICS based therapies in patients less likely to benefit from such treatments.

Caracterización clínico-espirométrica de pacientes asmáticos con síntomas nocturnos / Clinical-spirometric characterization of asthmatic patients with nocturnal symptoms

Introducción: Los síntomas nocturnos son frecuentes en asmáticos y pueden relacionarse con la gravedad, el grado de control del asma y la función pulmonar. Objetivos: Determinar las características demográficas, clínicas y espirométricas de pacientes asmáticos con síntomas nocturnos, que acuden a consulta externa de neumología. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo transversal en 50 pacientes asmáticos con síntomas nocturnos, atendidos por consulta externa en el Hospital Neumológico Benéfico Jurídico, en el período comprendido de mayo de 2017 a mayo de 2018. Resultados: Predominó el sexo femenino (74,0 por ciento), la edad entre 40 y 59 años (52,0 por ciento), los antecedentes familiares de asma o alergia (60,0 por ciento) y múltiples comorbilidades asociadas (78,0 por ciento). La hipersomnia diurna estuvo presente en 80,0 por ciento de los casos, con una frecuencia significativamente elevada en pacientes con asma persistente moderada y severa, disminución de la reversibilidad aguda al broncodilatador, mal control de la enfermedad y limitación de la actividad física. Conclusiones: Los síntomas nocturnos en los pacientes asmáticos son frecuentes y se relacionan con la hipersomnia diurna, la gravedad del asma, el grado de control, la respuesta al broncodilatador y limitación de la actividad física(AU)

Introduction: Nighttime symptoms are frequent in asthmatics and can be related to severity, degree of asthma control and lung function. Objectives: To determine the demographic, clinical and spirometric characteristics of asthmatic patients with nocturnal symptoms, who go to an outpatient pulmonology clinic. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in 50 asthmatic patients with nocturnal symptoms, they were assisted in the outpatient consultation at the Hospital Neumológico Benéfico Jurídico, from May 2017 to May 2018. Results: Female sex (74.0 percent), age ranging 40 and 59 years (52.0 percent), family history of asthma or allergy (60.0 percent) and multiple associated comorbidities (78.0 percent) predominated. Daytime hypersomnia was present in 80.0 percent of cases, with significantly elevated frequency in patients with moderate and severe persistent asthma, decreased acute reversibility to the bronchodilator, poor disease control, and limited physical activity. Conclusions: Nocturnal symptoms in asthmatic patients are frequent and are related to daytime hypersomnia, asthma severity, degree of control, response to the bronchodilator and limitation of physical activity(AU)

Bronchodilator test in extreme old age: Adverse effects of short-acting beta-2 adrenergic agonists with clinical repercussion and bronchodilator response

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate chronological age as a limiting factor to perform the bronchodilator test, determine significant adverse effects of short-acting beta 2 agonists with clinical repercussions, and assess bronchodilator response in extreme-old-age patients who undergo the spirometry test. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional and retrospective study. The sample was extracted from the database (spirometer and respiratory questionnaire) of a pulmonary function service. Patients over 90 years old were included in the research, and we evaluated their bronchodilator response and its significant adverse effects that may have clinical repercussions related to the bronchodilator. RESULTS: A sample of 25 patients aged 92.12 ± 2.22 years (95% CI, 91.20 - 93.04), with a minimum age of 90 years and a maximum of 97 years and a predominance of females with 72% (18/25). The bronchodilator test was performed in 84% (21/25) of the patients. The bronchodilator response was evaluated in 19 of the 21 patients (90.47%) who underwent the bronchodilator test. Two tests did not meet the criteria of acceptability and reproducibility. No clinical adverse effects were observed with the bronchodilator medication (salbutamol) during or after the exam. CONCLUSIONS: Chronological age is not a limiting factor for the bronchodilator test, short-acting beta-2 agonists did not present adverse effects with significant clinical repercussion and were useful in the diagnosis and therapeutic guidance of extreme-old-age patients.

RESUMO OBJETIVOS: Avaliar se idade cronológica é um fator limitante para realizar prova broncodilatadora, determinar efeitos adversos significativos com repercussão clínica dos beta-2 agonistas de curta ação e avaliar a resposta broncodilatadora na espirometria, na velhice extrema. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal, retrospectivo. Amostra extraída do banco de dados (espirômetro e questionário respiratório) de um serviço de função pulmonar. Incluídos na pesquisa pacientes com ≥90 anos, sendo avaliados a resposta broncodilatadora e efeitos adversos significativos com repercussão clínica ao broncodilatador. RESULTADOS: Amostra de 25 pacientes com idade de 92,12 ± 2,22 anos (IC 95%; 91,20 - 93,04), idade mínima de 90 anos e máxima de 97 anos, predominando o sexo feminino, com 72% (18/25). A prova broncodilatadora foi realizada em 84% (21/25) dos pacientes. A avaliação da resposta ao broncodilatador foi feita em 19 dos 21 pacientes (90,47%) que realizaram a prova broncodilatadora, uma vez que dois desses exames não preencheram os critérios de aceitabilidade e reprodutibilidade. A resposta broncodilatadora foi significativa em 10,52% (2/19) dos pacientes, ambos portadores de pneumopatia obstrutiva. Não foram observados efeitos adversos com repercussão clínica da medicação broncodilatadora (salbutamol) durante ou após sua realização. CONCLUSÕES: A idade cronológica não é um fator limitante para a realização da prova broncodilatadora, os beta-2 agonistas de curta ação não apresentaram efeitos adversos com repercussão clínica significativa e foram bastante úteis para auxiliar no diagnóstico e orientação terapêutica na velhice extrema.

Simple predictors to differentiate acute respiratory infections from acute asthma in children 6 months to 5 years

Background: Acute respiratory infections constitute one of the principal causes of morbidity and mortality in children less than five years of age in developing countries. For logistic reasons, WHO recommended case management is structured towards treatment as pneumonia in preference to acute asthma. It is warned that wheezing can occur during pneumonia and therefore, care must be taken when treating wheezing not to miss treating pneumonia with an antibiotic. Current WHO ARI CASE MANAGEMENT guidelines, in a child presenting with cough and rapid breathing, there is a predilection for over -treatment of pneumonia and under treatment of asthma.Methods: Totally 245 children were included in the study. They were classified into asthmatic and LRI prone with the help of simple predictors.Results: The combination of fever, chest indrawing and persistent tachypnoea after bronchodilator has an excellent specificity of 96.12% in predicting the presence of pulmonary infiltrate. The presence of more than two episodes of similar respiratory distress, previous H/O of nebulization and family H/O asthma, either alone or in combination may point more towards asthma as a cause of cough and respiratory distress.Conclusions: In a child presenting with cough and fast breathing with a previous similar episode, trial nebulization can be given before investigating further for pneumonia.