Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-149756

ABSTRACT

Introduction: A newborn with a disorder of sex development (DSD) has ambiguous genitalia and thus, it is difficult to identify the sex of such a baby at birth. Early identification is essential for psychological, social and medical reasons. Therefore a karyotype is mandatory but the result takes time whereas a buccal smear result for Barr bodies is available within a few hours. Objective: Assess the usefulness of a buccal smear as an initial investigation for genetic assessment of a baby with a DSD. Method: A buccal smear and karyotype were done on all babies with a DSD referred to a ward at the Lady Ridgeway Hospital, Sri Lanka over 3 years from November 2008. A smear was made from the buccal mucosa and 100 squamous cells were examined for the presence of Barr bodies. Control samples were taken from their mothers. Barr bodies will be present in ≥25 cells if the baby is 46, XX and there will be no Barr bodies in 46, XY. Results: Buccal smear result corresponded to the karyotype in 23 of 33 (70%) patients. The smears were inconclusive in 5 and were negative in 4 with 45, X/46, XY. The strength of agreement between a buccal smear and karyotype in assessing sex was ‘moderate’ (kappa 0.571, p=0.001). All buccal smear results were available in 24-48 hours and 73% of the karyotype results after 4 weeks. Conclusions: This is a useful initial investigation for genetic assessment prior to a karyotype in a baby with a DSD. Sex chromosome mosaicism cannot be identified by this method.

2.
Indian J Hum Genet ; 2008 Jan; 14(1): 7-8
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-138842

ABSTRACT

Buccal mucosal smears of 100 female patients of carcinoma of breast were compared with 100 controls matched accordingly. The frequency of Barr bodies was significantly lower in carcinoma of breast patients (menstruating and menopausal women) P < 0.001 when compared with controls indicating reactivation of the inactive X chromosome.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL