ABSTRACT
Background: With the increasing caesarean section rates a new challenging evil of caesarean scar pregnancy (CSPs) has emerged. As a variant of ectopic pregnancy caesarean scar pregnancy is the rarest of all. Diagnosis and management of CSP can be challenging especially when there are no early symptoms and even lessor index of suspicion. Objective of this endeavour was to present one institute experience of management of caesarean scar pregnancies.Methods: This are a retrospective analysis of women admitted with CSP. Detailed history, investigation, management protocols and complications were noted.Results: Of the total cases maximum women (60%) had history of previous two caesarean section. 90 % of cases were managed successfully with intra-sac or systemic methotrexate, and surgical evacuation with Foley’s catheter tamponade, only two women needed hysterectomy for uncontrolled bleeding.Conclusions: Caesarean scar pregnancy is a diagnostic and management challenge in modern obstetrics. Early ultrasound diagnosis helps in planning a successful medical treatment and serves to preserve uterus and fertility. Treatment with transabdominal intra-sac methotrexate and Foley’s catheter for tamponade is safe and effective method of treating CSPs.
ABSTRACT
Caesarean scar ectopic is one of the rarest of all ectopic pregnancies. The incidence of caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP), which was extremely rare till recent times, has been rising steadily. Case have more of such cases being published in medical literature now. It is defined as when a blastocyst implants on a previous caesarean scar. The incidence of caesarean scar ectopic has increased due to increase in number of caesarean deliveries. Early diagnosis of this can be done by using ultrasound. It is very important because a delay can lead to increased maternal morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis leads to prompt management and improves the outcome by allowing preservation of future fertility. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has important role when sonography is equivocal or inconclusive before therapy or intervention. Case are reporting a rare case of G2P1l1 with previous one caesarean delivery, diagnosed as caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy with the help of sonography. Patient underwent laparotomy and on histopathological examination caesarean scar pregnancy was confirmed. Due to the rarity of this condition, there are no specific guidelines available for its management.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the effect of combination of uterine artery chemoembolization and curettage in treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy(CSP),and to analyze the possible influence factors.Methods 46 cases with caesarean scar pregnancy treated by the combination of uterine artery chemoembolization and curettage were retrospectively analyzed.Univariate analysis was made on the factors that might influence the efficacy,and the Logistic regression model was constructed for the significant variables.Results All of the patients were terminated pregnancy succesfully .According to the ultrasound recheck,there were no residual gestational sac tissue in 29 patients,and some residual gestational sac tissue in 17 patients.After the application of traditional Chinese medicine or methotrexate and other symptomatic treatment, the pregnancy was terminated.The univariate analysis showed that the number of cesarean section,the gestational sac volume,the gestational weeks,the type of CSP,and the condition of the fetal heart pulsation were related to the presence of residues in the uterus after treatment (P＜0.05).The multivariate analysis showed that gestational sac volume ＞9 cm3 ,gestational weeks ＞ 7 weeks and exogenous CSP were the independent factors leading to intrauterine residual gestational sac tissue.Conclusion Uterine artery chemoembolization combined with curettage is an effective method for treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy.It is proposed that clinical treatment should pay close attention to the factors that may affect the efficacy.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To analyse the clinical value of uterine artery embolization(UAE)in the treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy(CSP)in the second trimester of pregnancy.METHODS: The clinical data of 29 cases treated from January2013 to June 2018 in Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University was retrospective analyzed.The patients were divided into group A(14 cases)and group B(15 cases)according to the first hospital. visitedPatients in group A first visited basic local hospitals and underwent drug-induced labor.Due to a large amount of vaginal bleeding or failure of induced labor,they were transferred to our hospital for further treatment. Patients in group B first visited our hospital and were treated by UAE before induced labor. The therapeutic effect was compared between the two groups.RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between the two groups in age,gestational weeks,number of caesarean section,period of time from previous caesarean section,or number of previous induced abortions(P>0.05).The average operation time of group B was shorter than that of group A[(54.00±31.19)min vs.(105.07±67.92)min,P<0.05]. The average intraoperative bleeding of group B was less than that of group A[(73.33±24.57)mL vs.(869.29±276.99)mL,P<0.05].Postoperative vaginal bleeding time of group B was shorter than that of group A[(4.46±1.06)d vs.(6.79±2.08)d,P<0.05].Average hospitalization time of group B was shorter than that of group A[(8.80±1.74)d vs.(14.57±4.54)d,P<0.05].The transfusion rate of group B was lower than that of group A[0 vs.78.6%,P<0.05].The uterine retention rate of group B was higher than group A[100% vs.71.4%,P<0.05].CONCLUSION: UAE has significant clinical value in the treatment of CSP in the second trimester of pregnancy.It can reduce operation time,intraoperative bleeding volume and increase uterine retention rate.
ABSTRACT
Objective To assess the clinical value of taken out embryo by hysteroscopy in treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy. Methods 20 cases of caesarean scar pregnancy from May 2014 to April 2015 were treated with hysteroscopy. Results All the 20 cases were treated by hysteroscopy successfully, none of them suffered from conver-sion to laparotomy, perforation of uterus and heavy vaginal bleeding. Conclusions The operation of taken out embryo by hysteroscopy is effective operation in treating caesarean scar pregnancy with mini-trauma, few distress, and less cost.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of hysteroscopy combined with foley balloon tamponade in the management of caesarean scar pregnancy ( CSP ) . Methods Twenty-one cases were diagnosed as having CSP by ultrasound examinations from January 2008 to November 2013.Among them, 11 cases with serum β-hCG below 500 IU/L underwent the surgery after taking mifepristone for 2 days, while 10 cases with serum β-hCG over 500 IU/L underwent surgery after injection of MTX combined with oral administration of mifepristone for 7 -14 days.All the cases were treated by hysteroscopy combined with foley balloon tamponade . Results The hysteroscopic operation was successfully conducted in 19 of 21 cases, with the operate time ranged 15-42 min.One case was given a second hysteroscopy and one case required a secondary laparoscopic procedure for the uterine perforation.In 18 cases with preoperative serum β-hCG below 500 IU/L, the intraoperative blood loss was 20 -100 ml, while in another 3 cases with preoperative serum β-hCG 1085-2760 IU/L, the blood loss was 200-800 ml.Follow-up examinations at clinic for 2-4 weeks in 16 cases showed levels of β-hCG declined to normal and recovery of menstruation at 43-56 postoperative days with normal menses amount . Conclusion Hysteroscopy combined with foley balloon tamponade in the management of CSP offers advantages of safety and effectiveness , which is deserved to clinical application .