Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Indian Med Assoc ; 2022 Mar; 120(3): 66-67
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-216499

ABSTRACT

Delayed Cardiac Perforation by Permanent Pacemaker lead beyond one year of implantation is rare. It is also rarer in passive fixation lead, compared to active fixation lead. There is no Universal consensus regarding management of such cases with percutaneous versus surgical removal of the lead followed by re-implantation. Here we report a case of Right Ventricular (RV) perforation by a passive fixation permanent lead, in an 81-year-old lady, 14 months after implantation, who presented with Pacemaker capture failure but in hemodynamically stable condition. Pacemaker lead had migrated up to the Lower Lobe of Left Lung, Perforating Right Ventricle, pericardium and Left Pleura. We managed this case with open lead removal under direct vision by Lower Median Sternotomy, followed by implantation of an Epicardial Lead and Pacemaker

2.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-166624

ABSTRACT

Medtronic CapSureFix MRI 5086 pacing lead (5086; Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) has been reported to be associated with increased cardiac perforation and lead dislodgement. This study aimed to compare the incidence of cardiac perforation and lead dislodgement within 30 days after pacemaker implantation between 5086 MRI lead and previous Medtronic CapSureFix Novus 5076 non-MRI pacing lead. This was a nationwide, multicenter retrospective study in which we compared the incidence of adverse events between 277 patients implanted with 5086 lead and 205 patients implanted with 5076 lead between March 2009 and September 2014. Cardiac perforation within 30 days of pacemaker implantation occurred in 4 patients (1.4%) with the 5086 lead and in no patient with the 5076 lead (P = 0.084). Lead dislodgement occurred in 8 patients (2.9%) with the 5086 lead and in 5 patients (2.4%) with the 5076 lead (P = 0.764). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, age was significantly associated with cardiac perforation. Congestive heart failure and implantation of right atrial (RA) lead at RA free wall or septum were significant factors for the incidence of lead dislodgement and lead revision. The incidence of cardiac perforation and lead dislodgement were not statistically different between the patients with 5086 lead and the patients with 5076 lead. However, careful attention for cardiac perforation may be needed when using the 5086 MRI lead, especially in elderly patients.


Subject(s)
Aged , Humans , Heart Failure , Incidence , Logistic Models , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Retrospective Studies
3.
Ann Card Anaesth ; 2013 Jul; 16(3): 205-208
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-147266

ABSTRACT

Pectus excavatum is a chest wall deformity that produces significant cardiopulmonary disability and is typically seen in younger patients. Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum or Nuss procedure has become a widely accepted technique for adult and pediatric patients. Although it is carried out through a thoracoscopic approach, the procedure is associated with a number of potential intraoperative and post-operative complications. We present a case of cardiac perforation requiring emergent cardiopulmonary bypass in a 29-year-old male with Marfan syndrome and previous mitral valve repair undergoing a Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum. This case illustrates the importance of vigilance and preparation by the surgeons, anesthesia providers as well as the institution to be prepared with resources to handle the possible complications. This includes available cardiac surgical backup, perfusionist support and adequate blood product availability.


Subject(s)
Adult , Cardiopulmonary Bypass , Emergencies , Funnel Chest/complications , Funnel Chest/surgery , Heart Atria/injuries , Heart Injuries/injuries , Heart Injuries/surgery , Humans , Intraoperative Complications/therapy , Male , Marfan Syndrome/complications
4.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-193252

ABSTRACT

Nuss procedure offers excellent outcome effect in the cosmetic point of view, but the complications such as cardiac perforation, pericardial effusion, constrictive pericarditis, hemothorax, pneumothorax and bar displacement sometimes occur. We experienced a 13-year-old-male, who showed the profound hypotension with bradycardia due to the cardiac perforation and the lung laceration during the pericardiectomy and the removal of pectus bar. Emergent partial cardiopulmonary bypass was initiated and then, ruptured right atrium and lung laceration were repaired without the remarkable complications. In anesthetic management of the pectus excavatum. This case reveals that special attention should be paid to those with cardiac perforation and lung laceration.


Subject(s)
Humans , Bradycardia , Cardiopulmonary Bypass , Funnel Chest , Heart Atria , Hemothorax , Hypotension , Lacerations , Lung , Pericardial Effusion , Pericardiectomy , Pericarditis, Constrictive , Pneumothorax
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL