ABSTRACT
Background: This study examined the effects of smartphones addiction on cervical posture, and compared the cervical range of motion (ROM) between addicted and non-addicted boys and girls 8 to 13 years of age. Methods: Twenty-four boys and 26 girls were assigned to 2 groups; addicted group (score > 32, n=32) and non-addicted group (score ≤ to 32, n=18). Craniovertebral Angle (CVA) was assessed using side view photographs, forward head posture (FHP) was measured using ImageJ 64 software, and cervical ROM in each direction was measured using a cervical (CROM) device. Results: A forward multiple regression showed that addiction score and body mass index (BMI) were significant predictors of CVA (R2 =0.31, p<0.001). Twenty-three percent of the variability in CVA was related to addiction score. A forward logistic regression showed that addiction to smartphone use and BMI were significant predictors of having FHP, and participants who were addicted were more than four times as likely to have FHP than those who were not: Odds Ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI)=4.5 (1.2, 10.7), p= 0.03. A significant reduction was found in mean cervical angle in addicted versus non-addicted boys (49.4±6.7 vs. 55.5±7.6,η2=0.5, p=0.03) and girls (47.3±6.3 vs. 52.9±6.1,η2=0.9, p=0.02). A significantly more limited cervical ROM found in most neck movements in addicted participants with FHP compared to participants without FHP. Conclusion: Children who are addicted to smartphones may develop faulty habitual posture due to constant neck flexion downward, which may place them at high risk of spine abnormalities.
ABSTRACT
Introducción: Los problemas posturales se inician, en la mayoría de los casos, en la infancia, por lo tanto en período de crecimiento una actitud postural alterada compromete el equilibrio cefálico y la posición de la mandíbula pudiendo originar malocluciones. Objetivo: Analizar si existe relación entre el ángulo cráneo-cervical y el patrón esqueletal en una población infantil. Material y métodos: Se evaluaron 70 pacientes con telerradiografía de cráneo de perfil con exámenes cefalométrico de Ricketts con patrón esqueletal de clase I, II y III (Campo II relación cráneo-mandibular, factor 7 convexidad) y el cefalograma de Rocabado, utilizando el ángulo cráneo-vertebral. Resultado: Tanto el sexo como el patrón esqueletal son significativos, su interacción no lo es. A su vez, la edad no resulta significativa. Conclusión: En el presente estudio se encontró que existe relación significativa entre el ángulo cráneo-cervical y el patrón esqueletal (AU)
Introduction: Postural problems begin in most cases, in childhood, therefore during growth an altered postural attitude compromises the cephalic balance and jaw position causing posible malocclucion. Objective: It is to present the correlation between the skull and cervical angle skeletal pattern in a child population. Material and methods: 70 patients were evaluated with teleradiography cephalometric profile tests Ricketts skeletal pattern with class I, II and III (Field II craniomandibular relationship, Factor 7 convexity) and cephalogram Rocabado, using the craniovertebral angle. Result: Both sex and skeletal pattern are significant and their interaction is not. In turn, age is not significant. Conclusion: In the present study it was found that there is a statistically significant relationship between the cranial-cervical angle, and the skeletal pattern (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Skull/diagnostic imaging , Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Cephalometry/methods , Malocclusion/diagnostic imaging , Argentina , Posture/physiology , Schools, Dental , Factor VII , Sex Factors , Analysis of Variance , Maxillofacial DevelopmentABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The study was to assess the value of the cervical angle (CA) and cervical length (CL) measurement by transvaginal ultrasonography (USG) in predicting delivery within 7 days after USG in low risk singleton term pregnancies. METHODS: This prospective study included 85 singleton low risk term pregnancies. The CA and the CL were measured at 36 weeks' gestation and each week thereafter. Seven cases were lost to follow-up and finally a total of 78 cases were analyzed. The number of days to delivery was recorded. The odds ratios of the CA and CL for predicting delivery within 7 days after USG at different weeks' gestation were calculated using the Cox proportional hazard model. Receiver-operation characteristic curves were drawn to determine the cutoff values of the CA and CL. RESULTS: CA measurement did not predict delivery within 7 days after USG. However, there was a significant relationship between the CL and the days to delivery at 37 weeks' gestation. The optimal cutoff value in predicting the delivery within 7 days was 10 mm at 37 weeks' gestation. We could not obtain proper cutoff points at other weeks' gestation. CONCLUSION: CA measurement by transvaginal USG may not have a significant clinical impact on predicting delivery within 7 days after USG. However, CL measurement USG at 37 weeks' gestation can help predict the delivery within 7 days after USG.