The comparative analysis of two kinds of ways combined two en-doscopes in treating cholelith / 国际外科学杂志

Objective To compare the effects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined choledochoscopic exploration( method A)and duodenoscopic sphincterotomy combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy( method B) in treating choledocholithiasis with cholecystohthia-sis. Methods A retrospective study was adopted to analyze by statistical methods comparatively the clinical data of 114 patients, concerning operation time, blood lost, odynolysis rate, conversion rate,calculi residual rate ,complication rate ,hospitalization time and cost, et al. 68 cases were treated by method A,and 72 ca-ses were treated by method B. Results There were statistical differences in calculi residual rate, a conver-sion rate, apart complication rates and hospitalization cost between two groups, but there was no statistical difference in other index. Conclusion The two methods for choledocholithiasis and cholecystohthiasis has advantage and shortcoming respectively. The treatment for patients must be individualized by MRCP/USG, actual state of illness, and so on.

Clinical research on laparascopic management for patients with both gallbladder and common bile duct stones / 中国内镜杂志

[Objective] To investigate the therapeutic status of laparoscopic management for gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones. [Methods] A Retropective study were adopted to analysize the therapeutic scheme,effect for patients with gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones who were treated from January 1996 to September 2004. [Results] 68 cases were diagnosed, and most of them underwent single stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and common bile duct exploration (LC BDE). A few of them were treated through endoscopic procedure in combination with LC, or open surgery when the minimal invasive surgery failed. [Conclusions] Both them indicated that patients by LC+LCBDE have shorter hospital stay, easier recovery and less complications. LC+LCBDE has obvious advantage over the other methods with appropriate operative time and high success rate. For choledochlithiasis patients, the single laparoscopic management should be a better, major option.