ABSTRACT
Context: As the number of head-and-neck cancer (HNC) patients are high in our subcontinent, the study was designed to reduce the treatment time and increase efficacy. Aims: Comparative evaluation of the efficacy, toxicity, local control, and survival of concomitant boost radiotherapy (CBRT), CBRT with concurrent chemoradiation (CBRT + CCT) and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy (CFRT + CCT) in locally advanced HNC (LAHNC). Materials and Methods: Patients with LAHNC were randomly assigned to 3-groups of 30-patients each. Group I (CBRT) received, 45 Gy/25#/5-weeks and 18 Gy/10# concomitant boost in the last 2-week of treatment, receiving a total dose of 63 Gy. Group II (CBRT + CCT) received CBRT with concomitant cisplatin 75 mg/m 2 on day 1, 17, and 34. Group III (CFRT + CCT) received 64 Gy/32#/6.2 weeks, concurrent with injection cisplatin 75 mg/m 2 on day 1, 22, and 42. Statistical Analysis Used: Stata 9.0 SPSS and Chi-square test were used for analysis and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: The median follow-up period was 8.2 months. At last follow-up, locoregional control was 36%, 57%, and 40% and DFS was seen in 33%, 53%, and 40% of patients in Group I, II, and III, respectively. Grade-3 cutaneous reactions were significantly higher in Group-II as compared to that of Group-III (P = 0.033) and Group-I (P = 0.715). Conclusion: All three groups have similar response rates and DFS with manageable toxicity
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the toxicity between different dose fractionation regimens in postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Methods Patients with prostate cancer who received postoperative radiotherapy with moderate hypo-fractionation ( 62. 75 Gy in 25 fractions, 2. 51 Gy per fraction) or conventional fractionation (72 Gy in 36 fractions, 2 Gy per fractions) in our hospital from 2011 to 2017 were enrolled as subjects.All patients received intensity-modulated radiotherapy and daily cone-beam computed tomography image-guided radiotherapy. According to the propensity score matching ( PSM ) method, 35 patients treated with moderately hypo-fractionated radiotherapy were matched to 35 patients treated with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy based on age, irradiated volume, hormonal therapy, interval between surgery and radiotherapy, and comorbidities ( diabetes and hypertension). Toxicity was evaluated according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. Comparison was made by the Fisher's exact probability test. Results One hundred and thirteen patients, consisting of forty-one in moderate hypo-fractionation group and seventy-two in conventional fractionation group, were enrolled as subjects. The median follow-up time in the two groups was 5. 6 and 45. 0 months, respectively. There were no significant differences in incidence rates of grade 2 acute gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity between the two groups ( 7% vs. 7%, P＝ 1. 000; 15% vs. 17%, P＝ 0. 847). After PSM, there were still no significant differences in incidence rates of grade 2 acute GI or GU toxicity between the two groups (9% vs. 11%, P＝0. 814; 14% vs. 11%, P＝ 0. 670). None of patients reported ≥grade 3 GI or GU toxicity. Conclusions Preliminary results show that moderate hypo-fractionation, compared with conventional fractionation, does not increase the risk of acute GI or GU toxicity in patients undergoing postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
ABSTRACT
treatment of LS-SCLC, two fractionation modes show similar short-term efficacy and survival benefits. However, hyperfractionated radiotherapy causes a higher incidence of radiation esophagitis than conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. Given that hyperfractionated radiotherapy is not superior to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy,conventionally fractionated radiotherapy is recommended for treating LS-SCLC.