ABSTRACT
To anticipate difficulties with intrusion, extrusion, or torqueing mechanics in certain malocclusions, a thorough understanding of crown-root relationships in the bucco-lingual plane is warranted. This study aimed at examining the collum angle of the maxillary central incisor in Angle’s class I and class II division 2 malocclusion and compare these values with the Labial Crown Root Angle (LCRA). MethodsThis study was conducted on two groups i.e., group 1 comprising of 26 Angle’s Class 1 subjects and group 2 comprising of 26 Class II div 2 subjects. Cephalometric measurements of collum angle and LCRA of maxillary central incisors were recorded for each subject and were compared between the two groups. ResultsThe mean Labial Crown-Root Angle was 28.35 ± 4.01 and 38.51 ± 5.80 for class I and class II division malocclusions respectively. Compared to the LCRA of Angle’s class I malocclusion, the mean LCRA of Angle’s class II division 2 was found to be greater, and is statistically significant. There was no significant gender variation. The mean difference between class I and class II div 2 malocclusion was found to be 9.42 ± 2.23 for collum angle and 10.16 ± 1.79 in LCRA respectively. ConclusionsThe Labial Crown Root Angle and collum angle of Angle’s Class II div 2 malocclusion were greater than the corresponding values in Angle’s Class I malocclusion. Also, the LCRA is a more simplified method for measuring the crown root angle and can be used as an adjunct to collum angle.
ABSTRACT
Objective@# To compare the morphology of the crown roots of upper and lower canines in patients with skeletal Class Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ malocclusions by CBCT and to provide guidance for the clinical treatment of orthodontics. @*Methods@#Randomly selected patients with permanent occlusal malocclusion who had undergone CBCT and X-ray skull lateral radiographs were Classified according to the ANB angle size: group Ⅰ, group Ⅱ, and group Ⅲ. Three-dimensional reconstruction was used to obtain the median sagittal section images of the right upper and lower canines. The crown root angle, crown root deflection distance, and lip tangent angle at the center of the clinical crown were used as indicators for measurement and analysis with the use of AutoCAD software.@*Results @#The difference in the crown-root skew distance between different sagittal face types, including upper canines (F=3.335, P=0.042), lower canines (F=3.745, P=0.029) crown root angles and upper canines (F=3.312, P=0.043), and lower canines (F=3.641, P= 0.032), was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The crown root angle of the maxillary canine in group Ⅰ was larger than that in group Ⅱ, and the deflection distance of the crown root was negative and the absolute value was lager in group Ⅰ than in group Ⅱ (P < 0.05). The deflection distance was positive and greater in group Ⅲ than in groups Ⅰ and Ⅱ (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the maxillary canine crown-labial tangent angle between the different sagittal facial misalignment groups (P > 0.05).@*Conclusion@#Differences in the morphology of canines were found among subjects with skeletal Class Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ malocclusions. The root of the upper canine in Class Ⅰ malocclusions was relatively closer to the labial side of the crown than that in Class Ⅱ malocclusions. The root of the lower canine in Class Ⅲ malocclusions was the closest to the lingual side of the crown among the three Classes.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To study crown-root morphology of maxillary anterior teeth in ClassⅡ,division 2 malocclusion using cone-beam CT (CBCT)combined with computer aided measurement technology to provide guidance for clinical treatment.Methods:The samples which consisted of 36 cases radiographed with CBCT techniques were selected and divided into two groups (1 8 each )based on the type of maloc-clusion presented:ClassⅡ,division 2 group (groupⅡ2)and ClassⅠgroup (groupⅠ).The measure-ments of crown-root morphology including crown-root angle and surface-shaft angle were got by Multiple Planer Reconstruction of CBCT data uploaded into InvivoDental software 5.0.The data were processed with SPSS 20.0 software package and t test was employed for comparison of angular measurements. Results:In group Ⅰ,crown-root angles of maxillary central incisor,maxillary lateral incisor and maxillary canines were 1 79.08°±3.31 °,1 76.55°±2.77°and 1 84.20°±2.51 °respectively, surface-shaft angles were 21 .00°±2.63°,1 9.63°±2.35°and 1 9.36°±2.30°respectively. While in group Ⅱ 2 ,crown-root angles of maxillary central incisor,maxillary lateral incisor and maxillary canines were 1 76.80°±2.62°,1 74.1 3°±3.28°and 1 81 .79°±2.88°respectively, surface-shaft angles were 23.20°±2.95°,22.29°±2.1 9°and 20.61 °±2.34°respectively. Compared with group Ⅰ,significant statistical differences were observed with the exception of sur-face-shaft angle of maxillary incisor.There was significant difference in crown-root angle between group Ⅱ2 and 1 80 °.Conclusion:The maxillary anterior teeth in ClassⅡ,division 2 malocclusion exhibited significant crown-root morphology which would influence the torque after orthodontic treat-ment.Special attention should be paid to the position of maxillary anterior teeth roots during ortho-dontic treatment for Class Ⅱ,division 2 malocclusion.The ideal position of tooth movement should be decided by the root rather than the location of the crowns.
ABSTRACT
Orthopantomogram is commonly used to evaluate root parallelism. "Good parallelism" between roots is widely accepted as one of the guidelines of a successful orthodontic treatment. In case there was a large angle between crown axis and root axis, and if we valued only the position of crown in establishing occlusal relationship without considering of the situation of root, the problem of root arrangement between adjacent teeth would be occurred. The estimate of root parallelism in mesiodistal direction before and after orthodontic treatment must be emphasized. The intent of this study was to determine the clinical importance and correlation of the angle between crown axis and root axis. Orthopantomograms of 105 orthodontic patients being treated in Yonsei university were used in this study. Twenty-eight teeth in both maxilla and mandible were selected and analyzed quantitively to evaluate the angle between crown axis and root axis, and obtain the correlationship among the individual teeth. The results are as follows: 1. Among the teeth presenting normal distribution, the maxillary right canine showed the largest mean valuer 5.73+/-4.42degrees), which was composed of the crown-root angles, and the mandibular left lateral incisor showed the smallest mean valuer 0.60+/-3.76degrees). 2. The crown-root angles of the maxillary incisors and the first molars, and the mandibular central incisors and the first molars didn`t show normal distribution and the ranges of these angles were dispersed. 3. Significant differences were present between the crown axis and the root axis except for lower first premolars. (p<0.05) 4. No significant difference was present for the crown-root angle between right and left side. (p<0.05) 5. No significant difference was present for the crown-root angle between male and female except for lower left first premolar. (p<0.05) 6. In the upper right quadrant, significant correlations were present between crown-root angles of the central incisor and lateral incisor, lateral incisor and canine. In the upper left quadrant, significant correlations were present between crown-root angles of the central incisor and lateral incisor. In the lower right quadrant, significant correlations were present between crown-root angles of the central incisor and lateral incisor, first molar and second molar. In the lower left quadrant, significant correlations were present between crown-root angles of the central incisor and lateral incisor, lateral incisor and canine, first molar and second molar. (p<0.05)