ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:Studies have shown that selection of implant crowns that directly impact the service life of implants and patient’s periodontal health is very important. OBJECTIVE:To compare the clinical effects of Lava zirconia crowns, goal-platinum al oy ceramic crowns and silver-pal adium al oy crowns supplemented by dental implants used in the single missing posterior tooth. METHODS:Sixty patients with first molar missing (120 teeth) were divided into three groups and treated with Lava zirconia, goal-platinum al oy ceramic and silver-pal adium al oy crowns applied to the dental implants for posterior column defects. The clinical restorative effects of three prostheses were compared. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:During 6-48 months of fol ow-up, the gingival edge coloring, gingival margin microleakage, the color of prosthesis of Lava zirconia al oy ceramic crowns and gold-platinum al oy ceramic crowns were better than those of silver-pal adium al oy crowns, and the gingival edge coloring and the color of prosthesis of Lava zirconia al oy ceramic crowns were better than those of gold-platinum al oy ceramic crowns, while the gingival margin microleakage of gold-platinum al oy ceramic crowns was better than that of Lava zirconia al oy ceramic crowns. Silver-pal adium al oy crowns were lower than Lava zirconia ceramic crowns and gold-platinum al oy ceramic crowns in the fracture extent. But silver-pal adium al oy crowns had the highest gingival index, the worst gingival health and rapidest and most severe plaque formation. Therefore, Lava zirconia al-ceramic crowns and gold platinum al oy-porcelain crown are ideal prostheses for implant restorations. The former has better biocompatibility, and the latter shows better marginal adaptation.