ABSTRACT
Background: Antihypertensive agents like Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEIs) and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Blockers (ARBs) are commonly indicated for patients with both hypertension and diabetes. However, the effect of these agents on blood sugar level or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is still controversial. This study aims at investigating theshort, and long term effects of ACEIs and ARBs on blood sugar level and HbA1c of a group of streptozocin (STZ)-induced NIDDM rats when given in combination with Glimepiride (antidiabetic drug from Sulfonylureas group).Methods: Diabetes mellitus (DM) was induced in 100 Wistar albino adult male and female laboratory rats above 8 weeks old, and weigh between 250-300 gm by the administration of Streptozocin 75% α-anomer. Two weeks later, the100 rats were then randomized into four groups (25 rats each). Groupone was the untreated control group (received placebo only), while other groups (II, III, and IV) were treated by Glimepiride only, Glimepiride plus ARB (Candesartan), and Glimepiride plus ACEI (Enalapril)respectively. HbA1C levels were measured at baseline (pre-test/directly after randomization) to ensure that there was no significant difference between study groups at the baseline, post-test (after two weeks), and delayed-post-test (12 weeks after randomization/ 10 weeks after post-test) to measure short and long-term changes in the study groups.Results: There was no significant difference (p-values >0.05) between the four groups (groups I, II, III, and IV) in the HbA1C mean level at the beginning of this study (two-weeks after randomization and injection of STZ) (mean = 7.62 ±SD = 0.41, 7.72 ±SD = 0.48, 7.66 ±SD = 0.47, and 7.52 ±SD = 0.51respectively). However, two weeks later, treated groups (groups II, III, and IV) showed moderate reduction of HbA1C mean level compared to the untreated (placebo) group I, that was significant in groups III, and IV, and insignificant in group II (mean =7.43±SD 0.54, 6.97±SD 0.33, 6.72±SD 0.26, and 7.71 ±SD 0.44 respectively). Furthermore, treated groups (groups II, III, and IV) showed significant dramatic reduction of HbA1C mean level when compared to the untreated group (group I) (mean = 6.22 ±SD 0.51, 5.24 ±SD 0.62, 5.22 ±SD 0.13, and 7.62 ±SD 0.42 respectively).Overall, treated groups showed significantly lower HbA1C level than placebo groups. Moreover, Glimepiride + Enalapril combination showed a stronger hypoglycemic effect than the Glimepiride + Candesartan combination at post, and post-delayed tests, however, these differences were not significant.Conclusion: The addition of either ACEIs like Enalapril, or ARBs like Candesartan to Sulfonylureas like Glimepiride to in NIDDM patients will synergize its anti-diabetic effect in NIDDM subjects, and might increase the possibility of hypoglycemia. Caution and/or dose adjustment should be considered upon using these agentstogether in patients with hypertension along with diabetes
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: It has been reported that many peripheral vasodilating drugs might improve insulin resistance. Cilostazol, a antithrombotic agent, increases peripheral blood flow in non-insulin dependent diabetic patients. The effect of cilostazol treatment on insulin resistance in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced non-insulin dependent diabetic Wistar rats was examined. METHODS: About a half of two-day old neonate siblings were injected intraperitoneally with STZ and maintained for six months, at which time they were compared with age-matched control rats for intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (IPGTT) and for glucose infusion rate (GINF) in a euglycemic hyperinsulinemic glucose-clamp study. After that, these studies were also performed after feeding rat chow containing cilostazol (100 mg/kg/day) to rats with STZ-induced non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus for four-weeks and compared with those of age-matched control rats. RESULTS: In the intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test studies, plasma glucose levels of STZ-induced non-insulin dependent diabetic rats were significantly higher and plasma insulin levels significantly lower than those of age-matched control rats in the age of six months. Glucose infusion rate was lower in STZ-induced non-insulin dependent diabetic rats than those of age-matched control rats. However, after a four-week cilostazol treatment, glucose infusion rate of STZ-induced non-insulin dependent diabetic rats was not significantly different from that of control rats. CONCLUSION: These findings suggested that cilostazol may improve insulin resistance in STZ-induced non-insulin dependent diabetic rats.