ABSTRACT
Introduction@#The clinical skills training at medical schools provides the opportunity for future medical doctors to deal with the client with proper care, diagnosis of the disease, first aid, treatment, nursing, treatment, counseling to address the complexity of the problem solving and the ethical attitude of the doctor. To achieve this objective, it is necessary to assess the level of knowledge, skills and attitudes students have acquired.@*Goal@#To analyze assignment of basic clinical skills assessment and to identify the level of кknowledge and skills students who have graduated second year medical program at “Ach” Medical University during 2016- 2017 academic year.@*Materials and Methods@#The study was used as a descriptive model to measure the reliability of the assignment, the difficulty factor of tasks, and the Hoffsten’s scores based on the tasks and performance of each station and compared with the indicators.@*Results@#Based on Hoffsten’s study on the success rate of examiners at the 5 stations, the Hoffsten’s score level of clinical examination was 68 percent, the physical examination station was 64 percent, the station’s diagnostic level was 71 percent, the laboratory was 70 percent and the nursing station was 70 percent.@*Conclusion@#At each clinical trial, the differential diagnosis of each individual clinical trial, clinical interview, nursing station and visual diagnostic station (DF> 95), at the laboratory and at the physical examination station, assess the student with a higher grade of difficulty factor (DF> 80) to the Hoffsten’s score of the basic clinical skills exam is set to be 70 percent.
ABSTRACT
Introduction@#One of the quality assurance measurements for medical schools is the achievement of students who have graduated in the assessment of the knowledge, skills and attitudes they are trained in.@*Goal@#To analyze assignment of theoretical and practical exam and to identify the level of кknowledge students who have graduate at “Ach” Medical University during 2015-2016 academic year.@*Materials and Methods@#The study was conducted on a cross sectional and descriptive study through the based on the task of analyzing the 261 graduate students theoretical and practical exam performance of the bachelor degree in Medicine, Dentistry, Traditional Medicine and Nursing of Ach Medical University of Mongolia /AMU/ and was assessed and to identify a reliability coefficient, difficulty factor, discrimination index, Hoffsten’s score. @*Results@#The reliabiliy coefficient of graduate exam meets requirement when it’s 0.94-0.96. According to the analysis of the 300 test of the each classroom of graduates was 70 percent (n=202) with weak dicrimination index, difficallty factor was more than 50 percent too easy, The Hoffsten’s score to which exam was passed of Medical graduates is 70 percent, traditional medicine is 87 percent, dentistry is 79 percent, the nursing is a Hoffsten’s score was 80 percent.@*Conclusions @#The reliability coefficient the theoretical exam of the graduates’ knowledge is convenient for all occupations, and whole field examines the weak difficulty index (DI≤0) for all field examinations. The Hoffsten’s score is 70% above the medical field. Graduate assignments can not discriminate graduates’ knowledge and skills levels and the difficulty factor graduate examination was very easy.
ABSTRACT
Dental caries is a major disease that threaten human's oral healthy severely with the characteristics of high incidence, low rate of treatment and high rate of retreatment. At present, restorative treatment remains the main method for caries treatment. With the development of the Minimally Invasive Cosmetic Dentistry (MICD), reasonable application of various treatment technologies, maximum preservation of tooth tissues and realizing the maximization of treatment effects become problems that call for immediate solution in dental clinics. In addition, there still exist a large number of old restorations that need standard retreatments. Here, some difficulty influence factors of dental caries clinical treatment such as systemic and oral factors, individual caries susceptibility, treatment technologies and materials, retreatment methods of old restorations and technique sensitivity are analyzed, and corresponding processing strategies are also put forward.