Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology ; (24): 351-356, 2015.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-460738

ABSTRACT

Objective:To analyze the clinical prognostic factors of liposarcoma on the extremities and trunk, as well as to retrospectively analyze the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy on liposarcoma of the extremities. Methods:Patients with liposarcoma of the extremities treated in our hospital from July 1, 2007 to December 31, 2012 were followed up. The relationship of clinical prognostic factors with gender, age, location, depth, and size of the tumors, as well as the histological grade and admission status, were statistically analyzed. The effects of adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) were evaluated. Results:A total of 82 patients with extremity liposarcoma received surgery-based comprehensive treatment in our hospital. Of the total patients, 73 received a 24-month to 88-month satisfied follow-up;the median follow-up time was 47 months. The OS rate was 83.6%(61/73), and the DFS rate was 68.5%(50/73). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the tumor location, histological grade, and admission status were the independent correlative factors influencing DFS, and the age and pathologic grading were the independent correlative factors influencing the OS. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that radiation therapy can significantly improve the DFS and OS of the G2 and G3-grade liposarcoma (DFS:59.1 months vs. 28.4 months, P<0.01;OS:70.8 months vs. 55.1 months, P<0.05). Significant difference was not found in the effect of chemotherapy on OS and DFS. Conclusion:The prognosis of liposarcoma was significantly associated with the pathologic grades and subtypes. Auxiliary radiotherapy could improve the survival and prognosis of G2 and G3 liposarcoma of the extremities, but the role of chemotherapy in treating liposarcoma remained unclear.

2.
Chinese Journal of Urology ; (12)2001.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-541314

ABSTRACT

Objective To analyze the factors that influence the disease-free survival time after radical prostatectomy for prostate adenocarcinoma and to study the expression and significance of Bcl-2,C-erbB-2,Ki-67 in prostate adenocarcinoma. Methods A total of 51 cases of prostate adenocarcinoma undergoing radical prostatectomy were reviewed.Cox proportional hazard model was used to investigate the impact and co-impacts of the factors,which included age, preoperative PSA level,Gleason scores of biopsies and operative specimens,EPE,MR,SVI,LN,PAT,PRT and having testes or not during follow-up.Immunohistochemical staining was used in biopsies and resected specimens to evaluate the positivity of Bcl-2,C-erbB-2,Ki-67 in 15 of the 51 cases. Results In stepwise Cox proportional hazards model, the prognostic factors for recurrence were age(P=0.011),maximal androgen blockade(P=0.017), positive margin of resection(P=0.000),postoperative Gleason score(P=0.002),having testes or not after operation(P=0.040).The expressions of 3 types of proteins showed negative correlation with the prognosis of prostate carcinoma. Conclusions Among clinicopathologic factors,positive resected margin is the most powerful prognostic factor.Patients will benefit from maximal androgen blockage before radical prostatectomy.Disease-free survival after radical prostatectomy is not influenced by not having pelvic lymphadenectomy after finding no enlarged lymph nodes intraoperatively.Not preserving testes after prostatectomy is a favorable factor.The prognosis of prostate carcinoma can be predicted with the expressions of Bcl-2,C-erbB-2 and Ki-67 in biopsies or resected specimens.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL