ABSTRACT
Purpose: To analyze the complications in patients managed with deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) for diseases of the anterior corneal stroma. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of all the patients who underwent DALK in a tertiary care center in South India from 2010 to 2020. A total of 474 eyes in 373 patients were included in the study. Patients who underwent DALK for advanced keratoconus, keratoconus with Bowman’s membrane scar, healed hydrops, macular corneal opacity, macular corneal dystrophy, granular corneal dystrophy, spheroidal degeneration, pellucid marginal degeneration, post– laser?assisted in situ keratomileusis ectasia, descematocele, post?collagen cross?linking aborted melt and dense scar, and post?radial keratotomy were included in the study. The patients were followed up for 17.2 +/? 9.2 months (1–9 years). Results: Complications noted in the surgery were intra?operatively Descemet’s membrane perforation in 31 eyes (6.54%), post?operatively secondary glaucoma in 16 eyes (3.37%), cataract in seven eyes (1.47%), suture?related complications in five eyes (1.05%), graft rejection in three eyes (0.63%), traumatic dehiscence in two eyes (0.42%), filamentary keratitis in two eyes (0.42%), interface infiltrate in one eye (0.21%), and recurrence of disease in four eyes (7.14%) out of 57 eyes with corneal dystrophy. Conclusion: DALK as an alternative to penetrating keratoplasty for anterior corneal stromal diseases. It has become an automatic choice for diseases of the anterior cornea requiring keratoplasty. Complications can occur at any stage of surgery; however, if identified and managed early, they can result in optimal outcome
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To evaluate functional and anatomical outcome in patients undergoing deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) with intraoperative Descemet's membrane (DM) perforation (macro and micro). Methods: A retrospective cross sectional study (January 2009 to December 2015) of sixteen eyes of sixteen patients which included nine patients of advanced keratoconus (KC), two patients with paracentral DM scarring post hydrops, KC with Bowman's membrane scarring, macular corneal dystrophy and one patient of advanced Pellucid Marginal Degeneration (PMD). All underwent DALK with intraoperative DM perforation. Big bubble technique was attempted in all except in the two patients with post hydrops DM scar. Preoperative and postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), astigmatism and endothelial count (EC) were compared. Results: Postoperative BCVA and astigmatism were found to be better and statistically significant ('p value' 0.00 and 0.003 respectively). BCVA preoperative and postoperative was 1.07± 0.3 and 0.28 ± 0.09 in LogMAR respectively and astigmatism pre and postoperative 4.14 ± 1.5 D and 2.7 ± 0.97 D respectively. Percentage decrease in EC at sixth postoperative week was 7.48% and at sixth month and 1 year postoperative was 15.1%. Two patients developed postoperative double anterior chamber and two patients developed pupillary block glaucoma and all were successfully managed. Conclusion: Not all patients of intraoperative DM perforation (including macro perforation) needs to be converted to penetrating keratoplasty. DALK can be successfully done if the perforation is identified early and managed adequately. This is the only known study which has shown a large series of successful DALK even with macro perforations.