Comparison of Outcomes Between All-Inside SingleBundle and Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study

@#Introduction: ACL rupture is the most common type of knee injury. The All-inside ACL reconstruction procedure features some distinguished components including closed-socket tunnels with less bone expulsion, double suspensory fixation, and smaller incisions. We aimed to compare the outcomes between the All-inside Single-bundle and the Double-bundle ACL reconstruction techniques. Materials and methods: This study was a retrospective study which analysed the patient-reported and the clinical outcomes on patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between January and December 2020 at Dr Kariadi General Hospital Semarang, Indonesia. We compared the patientreported and the clinical outcomes at 6- and 12-month follow-ups between the All-inside Single-bundle and the Double-bundle groups. The patient-reported outcomes were determined using the IKDC and Tegner-Lysholm scores while the clinical outcomes included the measurement of Thigh Circumference, Single Hop test, Anterior Drawer test, Lachman test, Range of motion, and the patient’s level of return to sport. Results: A total of 24 subjects were divided into two groups, namely the All-inside Single-bundle and the Double-bundle groups, consisting of 12 subjects in each group. Most of the subjects were male in both groups, including 9 (75%) subjects in the All-inside Single-bundle group, and 11 (91.67%) subjects in the Double-bundle group. The mean age of the subjects were 25.75±7.57 years old in the Allinside Single-bundle group, and 24.5±6.87 years old in the Double-bundle group. In terms of the side of the knee that suffered the most injuries in both groups were the right knees. The result of the patient-reported outcomes using IKDC and Tegner-Lysholm scores showed no statistically significant differences in both groups at 6- and 12-month follow-ups (p=0.864; p=0.293 and p=0.589; p=0.233, respectively). The results of clinical assessments at 6- and 12-month follow-ups also showed no statistically significant differences in both groups. Conclusion: Our study showed no significant differences in the patient-reported and the clinical outcomes between the All-inside Single-bundle and the Double-bundle ACL reconstruction techniques at 6- and 12-month follow-ups.

The Morphometric Study Of Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Cadaveric Study

Introduction: The anterior cruciate ligament is frequently injured ligament of the knee. It divides into anteromedialand posterolateral budles attached into tibia and femur. This study aimed to measure the length and width of twobundles of ACL separately to observe the morphormetrical difference. Since single or double bundle ACLreconstructive surgical procedure are commonly used by orthopaedic surgeon, our study may help them inhamstring or tendon graft procedures.Material and Methods: The Cadaveric study was conducted in the department of Anatomy at Pondicherry instituteof Medical sciences, Pondicherry from December 2015 – May 2016. Randomly selected thirty cadaveric wasincluded for the study and knees with ACL tear; macroscopic degenerative changes or any evidence of trauma wasexcluded from the study. The data was presented as frequencies and proportions, mean and standard deviations.Statistical significance (p value) was considered at 0.05 levels.Results: There was a statistically significant increase in transverse diameter. We observed P value of transversediameter of anteromedial bundle at tibial attchment (0.01) and (0.05) in anteroposterior diameter of posterolateralat tibial and in middle (0.04) showed a statistically significant increase in transverse diameter.Conclusion: ACL tears are managed surgically by a double bundle or single bundle ACL reconstruction technique.Recently, the anatomic double bundle ACL reconstruction has been found to be better in restoring the intact kneefunction compared to the conventional single bundle surgery when done perfectly. So our study of morphometricmeasurements of ACL can help the surgeons during accurate tendon graft procedure of anterior cruciate ligamentreconstructive surgeries.

Minimal Ablation of the Tibial Stump Using Bony Landmarks Improved Stability and Synovial Coverage Following Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical effects of using anatomical bony landmarks (Parsons' knob and the medial intercondylar ridge) and minimal ablation of the tibial footprint to improve knee anterior instability and synovial graft coverage after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective comparison of outcomes between patients who underwent reconstruction with minimal ablation of the tibial footprint, using an anatomical tibial bony landmark technique, and those who underwent reconstruction with wide ablation of the tibial footprint. Differences between the two groups were evaluated using second-look arthroscopy, radiological assessment of the tunnel position, postoperative anterior knee joint laxity, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Use of the anatomical reference and minimal ablation of the tibial footprint resulted in a more anterior positioning of the tibial tunnel, with greater synovial coverage of the graft postoperatively (p=0.01), and improved anterior stability of the knee on second-look arthroscopy. Both groups had comparable clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Use of anatomical tibial bony landmarks that resulted in a more anteromedial tibial tunnel position improved anterior knee laxity, and minimal ablation improved synovial coverage of the graft; however, it did not significantly improve subjective and functional short-term outcomes.

Mid-term effects of arthroscopic anatomical reconstruction of double bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament / 中华创伤骨科杂志

Objective To investigate the mid-term clinical outcomes of arthroscopic anatomical re-construction of double bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament ( ACL ) . Methods The clinical data of 78 patients diagnosed with ACL rupture from April 2012 to July 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. They were 60 males and 18 females, aged from 19 to 56 years ( mean, 26. 8 years ) . The time from injury to surgery ranged from one week to 23 months ( mean, 5. 8 months ) . All of them obtained positive results in anterior drawer test and Lachman test preoperatively. Their preoperative KT-1000 examinations showed an average side-to-side difference of 8. 29 ± 1. 81 mm in anterior laxity. They were all treated with arthroscopic anatomical recon-struction of double bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using autologous hamstrings. The International Knee Documentation Committee ( IKDC ) and Lysholm scores were used to assess their knee function at the last follow-up. Results All the 78 patients were followed up for 34. 6 months on average ( range, from 25 to 56 months ) . At the last follow-up, the IKDC and Lysholm scores were significantly increased from preoper-ative 42. 6 ± 9. 5 and 44. 4 ± 8. 5 to postoperative 92. 9 ± 2. 8 and 94. 2 ± 3. 4, respectively ( P <0. 05 ) . The Lachman test was negative in 73 cases ( 93. 6％) and the pivot shift test was negative in 69 cases ( 88. 5％) . The KT-1000 examinations showed that the side-to-side difference in anterior laxity averaged 1. 47 ± 0. 68 mm, significantly improved from the preoperative values ( P <0. 05 ) . At their last follow-up, 29 patients underwent MRI scans which showed continuity of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate liga-ment. Conclusion The arthroscopic anatomical reconstruction of double bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament can restore the knee stability and achieve fine mid-term clinical outcomes.

Factors Affecting the Extent of Graft Tendon Synovialization after Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Based on Second-Look Arthroscopic Findings

BACKGROUND: We aimed to examine the factors that influence synovialization of the grafted tendon after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction based on second-look arthroscopic findings. METHODS: Out of 205 knees that were treated between August 2008 and May 2016 with double-bundle ACL reconstruction using bio-absorbable cross-pins and Endobuttons for femoral tunnel fixation, we enrolled 65 knees (64 patients) that underwent second-look arthroscopy with hardware removal at 1 year postoperatively. Measured clinical outcomes included the Lysholm score and Tegner activity score that were evaluated preoperatively and during the final follow-up. We analyzed the relationship between synovial coverage and patient age, length of the preserved remnant tissue on the tibial side, type of bundle (anteromedial or posterolateral), type of graft (autograft or allograft), and time from injury to surgery. RESULTS: The area of synovial coverage showed a significant statistical correlation with patient age and the length of the preserved remnant tissue on the tibial side. The average synovial coverage was significantly better for the anteromedial bundle than for the posterolateral bundle, better for the autograft than for the allograft reconstruction, and better when treated in the acute stage than in the chronic stage. However, synovialization of grafted tendon did not correlate to clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: While we were able to identify several factors influencing synovialization of the grafted tendon after double-bundle ACL reconstruction, including patient age, length of preserved remnant tissue of the torn ACL, type of bundle, type of graft, and time from injury to surgery, we found no evidence that increased synovialization improves clinical outcomes at 1 year postoperatively.

Reconstrucción de ligamento cruzado posterior con técnica de doble banda en 100 pacientes con una media de 3 años de seguimiento / Outcomes after double-bundle PCL reconstruction

INTRODUCCIÓN: El objetivo de este trabajo fue determinar los resultados luego de una reconstrucción de doble banda del LCP (RLCP DB). MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Se incluyeron todos los pacientes sometidos a una RLCP DB artroscópica primaria para las lesiones completas de LCP (Grado III), entre mayo de 2010 y marzo de 2015. Se realizaron valoraciones funcionales (Tegner, Lysholm, WOMAC, SF-12) y objetivas (radiografías de estrés tibial posterior) antes y a un mínimo de dos años después de la operación. RESULTADOS: Cien pacientes que se sometieron a RLCP DB se incluyeron en este estudio. El promedio de seguimiento para la cohorte de RLCP DB fue de 2.9 años (rango, 2- 6 años). Hubo una mejoría significativa de todos los parámetros funcionales (todos los valores p <0,001). La diferencia media de lado a lado (DLL) en la traslación tibial posterior en radiografías de estrés mejoró de 11,0 ± 3,5 mm antes de la cirugía a 1,6 ± 2,0 mm después de la operación (p <0,001). CONCLUSIÓN: Se observaron resultados funcionales y objetivos significativamente mejores después de una RLCP DB en un seguimiento promedio de 3 años, con bajas tasas de complicaciones, independientemente de la patología ligamentaria concomitante o el momento de la cirugía (agudo o crónico). Además, se obtuvieron resultados clínicos subjetivos y funcionales similares en comparación con las reconstrucciones aisladas del LCA. Tipo de estudio: Serie de Casos. Nivel de evidencia: II.

BACKGROUND: to report on the outcomes after double-bundle PCL reconstructions in isolated versus combined injuries and acute versus chronic PCL reconstructions. METHODS: All patients who underwent a primary endoscopic RPCL DB for complete PCL tears (Grade III) PCL tears between May 2010 and March 2015 were reviewed. Patient reported outcome scores (Tegner, Lysholm, WOMAC, SF-12) and objective posterior stress radiographs were collected preoperatively and at a minimum two-years postoperatively. RESULTS: One hundred patients who underwent RPCL DB were included in this study. The mean follow-up for the PCL cohort was 2.9 years (range, 2-6 years). All functional scores improved at last follow up (all p values <0.001). The mean side-to-side difference (DLL) in posterior tibial translation on kneeling stress radiographs improved from 11.0 ± 3.5 mm preoperatively to 1.6 ± 2.0 mm postoperatively (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Significantly, improved functional and objective outcomes were observed after anatomic-based RPCL DB at a mean 3 years follow-up, with low complication rates, regardless of concomitant ligamentous pathology or timing to surgery. Additionally, contrary to previous reports, comparable subjective and functional clinical outcome were achieved compared to an isolated ACL reconstruction control cohort. Type Study: Case report. Level of evidence: II.

Evaluation of Knee Joint after Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction with Three-Dimensional Isotropic MRI

PURPOSE: To evaluate the knee joint after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with three-dimensional (3D) isotropic magnetic resonance (MR) image, and to directly compare the ACL graft findings on 3D MR with the clinical results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2009 to December 2014, we retrospectively reviewed MRIs of 39 patients who had reconstructed ACL with double bundle technique. The subjects were examined using 3D isotropic proton-density sequence and routine two-dimensional (2D) sequence on 3.0T scanner. The MR images were qualitatively evaluated for the intraarticular curvature, graft tear, bony impingement, intraosseous tunnel cyst, and synovitis of anteromedial and posterolateral bundles (AMB, PLB). In addition anterior tibial translation, PCL angle, PCL ratio were quantitatively measured. KT arthrometric values were reviewed for anterior tibial translation as positive or negative. The second look arthroscopy results including tear and laxity were reviewed. RESULTS: Significant correlations were found between an AMB tear on 3D-isotropic proton density MR images and arthroscopic proven AMB tear or laxity (P < 0.05). Also, a significant correlation was observed between increased PCL ratio on 3D isotropic MRI and the arthroscopic findings such as tear, laxities of grafts (P < 0.05). KT arthrometric results were found to be significantly correlated with AMB tears (P < 0.05) and tibial tunnel cysts (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: An AMB tear on 3D-isotropic MRI was correlated with arthroscopic results qualitatively and quantitatively. 3D isotropic MRI findings can aid the evaluation of ACL grafts after double bundle reconstruction.

A Comparison between Clinical Results of Selective Bundle and Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic anatomical double bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with either selective anteromedial (AM) or posterolateral (PL) bundle reconstruction while preserving a relatively healthy ACL bundle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors evaluated 98 patients with a mean follow-up of 30.8±4.0 months who had undergone DB or selective bundle ACL reconstructions. Of these, 34 cases underwent DB ACL reconstruction (group A), 34 underwent selective AM bundle reconstruction (group B), and 30 underwent selective PL bundle reconstructions (group C). These groups were compared with respect to Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, side-to-side differences of anterior laxity measured by KT-2000 arthrometer at 30 lbs, and stress radiography and Lachman and pivot shift test results. Pre- and post-operative data were objectively evaluated using a statistical approach. RESULTS: The preoperative anterior instability measured by manual stress radiography at 90° of knee flexion in group A was significantly greater than that in groups B and C (all p<0.001). At last follow-up, mean side-to-side instrumented laxities measured by the KT-2000 and manual stress radiography were significantly improved from preoperative data in all groups (all p<0.001). There were no significant differences between the three groups in anterior instability measured by KT-2000 arthrometer, pivot shift, or functional scores. CONCLUSION: Selective bundle reconstruction in partial ACL tears offers comparable clinical results to DB reconstruction in complete ACL tears.

Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an Outside-in Technique: Two- to Six-Year Clinical and Radiological Follow-up

PURPOSE: We evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using an outside-in technique with a follow-up of two- to six-years, especially in terms of the sports activity level and radiological degeneration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-seven patients who were available for a minimum two-year follow-up after double-bundle ACL reconstruction using an outside-in technique were retrospectively evaluated. The mean follow-up period was 43.7 months. The knee function and stability were evaluated before the operation, one year after the operation (short-term follow-up), and more than two years after the operation (last follow-up). RESULTS: Regarding the knee function, the Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) evaluation, and hop test showed significant improvement. Regarding the stability, the Lachman test, pivot shift test, KT-2000 arthrometer data, and anterior drawer radiographs using Telos showed significant improvement. Regarding the sports activity level, the patients who returned to pre-injury level activity was 68.7% according to the Tegner activity score and 76.1% according to the Cincinnati sports activity scale score. The incidence of aggravated degeneration or development of greater than IKDC grade A degeneration after surgery was 10.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Double-bundle ACL reconstruction using an outside-in technique showed favorable clinical and radiological outcomes with respect to the knee function and stability, joint degeneraion, and, especially, return to pre-injury sports activity.

Reconstrucción de ligamento cruzado anterior. Comparación de técnica transtibial versus técnica simple banda anatómica versus doble banda. Evaluación clínica y por resonancia magnética / Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Comparison between transtibial vs. anatomic single bundle vs. double bundle technique. Clinical and MRI evaluation

Introducción: El objetivo de nuestro estudio fue realizar una comparación retrospectiva clínica y con RMI, entre tres técnicas quirúrgicas de reconstrucción de LCA y compararlas con el LCA nativo. Nuestra hipótesis fue que desde portal medial se consigue mayor semejanza anatómica y que este resultado mejora la estabilidad articular objetiva y subjetiva. Material y métodos: comparación retrospectiva de 3 grupos de pacientes varones (20 pacientes por grupo), operados entre diciembre 2006 y diciembre 2007 por el mismo cirujano; seguimiento promedio de 5 años y 7 meses (rango 5 a 6 años). Grupo TT: reconstrucción con técnica monotúnel transtibial. Grupo SBA: reconstrucción con técnica anatómica simple banda. Grupo DBA: reconstrucción con técnica doble banda-doble túnel anatómica. Todos evaluados con score de Lysholm, IKDC, test de Lachman medido con artrómetro, test de pivot shift y RMI. Resultados: la reconstrucción de LCA con técnica SBA y DBA es muy precisa para alcanzar los puntos anatómicos de inserción y la inclinación del LCA comparándola con la técnica TT. No hubo diferencias significativas entre los 3 grupos a los 5 años de seguimiento en el score de Lysholm, en el IKDC; tampoco las hubo en el rango de movilidad, Lachman y pivot shift, siendo estos últimos menos marcados en el grupo de DBA y de SBA. Conclusión: las reconstrucciones con SBA y DBA son más anatómicas demostradas por RMI posoperatoria, sin embargo dicha ventaja teórica, no tiene expresión clínica significativa. Nivel de evidencia: III. Tipo de estudio: comparativo retrospectivo.

Purpose: To do a retrospective clinical and with MRI comparison between three surgical techniques of ACL reconstruction compared with the native ACL. We hypothesized that more anatomical similarity is achieved from medial portal and that this result improves objective and subjective joint stability. Methods: retrospective comparison of 3 groups of male patients that received surgery from December 2006 to December 2007, all performed by the same surgeon; average follow up 5 years and 7 months (range 5 to 6 years). TT group: 20 patients with conventional (transtibial) single bundle reconstruction; ASB group: 20 patients with anatomic single-bundle reconstruction; ADB group: 20 patients with anatomic double-bundle reconstruction. The outcomes were evaluated by an independent blinded observer using the Lysholm score, IKDC, Lachman test performed with KT1000 arthrometer, pivot-shift test and MRI to determine ACL graft obliquity and femoral and tibial insertion. Results: ASB and ADB reconstruction demonstrated a more anatomical graft placement and angulation in comparison with TT technique. There were no significant differences between the 3 groups at 5 years after surgery in the Lysholm score, IKDC; neither in Range Of Motion, Lachman test and pivot-shift test. Nevertheless, patients of ASB and ADB had better outcomes in the pivot shift and Lachman test. Conclusions: the postoperative MRI showed that ASB and ADB reconstructions are more anatomical; however, this theoretical advantage is not clinically relevant. Level of Evidence: III. Type of study: retrospective comparative.

Correlation between Femoral Guidewire Position and Tunnel Communication in Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

PURPOSE: The object of this study was to determine the shortest possible distances of antero-medial (AM) and postero-lateral (PL) guide wire tunnel positions required to prevent femoral bone tunnel communication in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using human cadaver knees. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The centers of femoral AM and PL bundles of 16 cadaveric knees were drilled with guide wires and the distances of guide wires, were measured upon entrance into the bone. Femoral tunnel drilling was performed using transportal technique. The diameters of AM and PL graft were 8 mm and 6 mm, respectively. CT scans were taken on each knee, and 3-dimensional models were constructed to identify the femoral tunnel position and to create AM and PL tunnel virtual cylinders. Thickness of the bone bridge between the two tunnels was measured. RESULTS: In four out of six specimens, in which the guide wires were placed at less than or equal to 9 mm, communication was noted. In specimens with guide wires placed at distances greater than or equal to 10 mm, communication was not noted. The two groups showed a statistically significant difference (p=0.008). In cases where the distance between the AM and PL femoral tunnel guide wires was 12 mm, the bone bridge thickness was greater than 2 mm along the tunnel. CONCLUSION: The technique for double bundle-anterior cruciate ligament (DB-ACL) reconstruction that we show here can avoid bone tunnel communication when AM and PL femoral guide wires are placed at least 10 mm apart, and 12 mm should be kept to preserve 2 mm bone bridge thickness.

Volume and Contact Surface Area Analysis of Bony Tunnels in Single and Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Autograft Tendons: In Vivo Three-Dimensional Imaging Analysis

BACKGROUND: Regarding reconstruction surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), there is still a debate whether to perform a single bundle (SB) or double bundle (DB) reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare the volume and surface area of femoral and tibial tunnels during transtibial SB versus transportal DB ACL reconstruction. METHODS: A consecutive series of 26 patients who underwent trantibial SB ACL reconstruction and 27 patients with transportal DB ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft from January 2010 to October 2010 were included in this study. Three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) was taken within one week after operation. The CT bone images were segmented with use of Mimics software v14.0. The obtained digital images were then imported in the commercial package Geomagic Studio v10.0 and SketchUp Pro v8.0 for processing. The femoral and tibial tunnel lengths, diameters, volumes and surface areas were evaluated. A comparison between the two groups was performed using the independent-samples t-test. A p-value less than the significance value of 5% (p < 0.05) was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Regarding femur tunnels, a significant difference was not found between the tunnel volume for SB technique (1,496.51 +/- 396.72 mm3) and the total tunnel volume for DB technique (1,593.81 +/- 469.42 mm3; p = 0.366). However, the total surface area for femoral tunnels was larger in DB technique (919.65 +/- 201.79 mm2) compared to SB technique (810.02 +/- 117.98 mm2; p = 0.004). For tibia tunnels, there was a significant difference between tunnel volume for the SB technique (2,070.43 +/- 565.07 mm3) and the total tunnel volume for the DB technique (2,681.93 +/- 668.09 mm3; p < or = 0.001). The tibial tunnel surface area for the SB technique (958.84 +/- 147.50 mm2) was smaller than the total tunnel surface area for the DB technique (1,493.31 +/- 220.79 mm2; p < or = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the total femoral tunnel volume was similar between two techniques, the total surface area was larger in the DB technique. For the tibia, both total tunnel volume and the surface area were larger in DB technique.

In Vivo Three-Dimensional Imaging Analysis of Femoral and Tibial Tunnel Locations in Single and Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions

BACKGROUND: Anatomic footprint restoration of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is recommended during reconstruction surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare and analyze the femoral and tibial tunnel positions of transtibial single bundle (SB) and transportal double bundle (DB) ACL reconstruction using three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT). METHODS: In this study, 26 patients who underwent transtibial SB ACL reconstruction and 27 patients with transportal DB ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft. 3D-CTs were taken within 1 week after the operation. The obtained digital images were then imported into the commercial package Geomagic Studio v10.0. The femoral tunnel positions were evaluated using the quadrant method. The mean, standard deviation, standard error, minimum, maximum, and 95% confidence interval values were determined for each measurement. RESULTS: The femoral tunnel for the SB technique was located 35.07% +/- 5.33% in depth and 16.62% +/- 4.99% in height. The anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) tunnel of DB technique was located 30.48% +/- 5.02% in depth, 17.12% +/- 5.84% in height and 34.76% +/- 5.87% in depth, 45.55% +/- 6.88% in height, respectively. The tibial tunnel with the SB technique was located 45.43% +/- 4.81% from the anterior margin and 47.62% +/- 2.51% from the medial tibial articular margin. The AM and PL tunnel of the DB technique was located 33.76% +/- 7.83% from the anterior margin, 45.56% +/- 2.71% from the medial tibial articular margin and 53.19% +/- 3.74% from the anterior margin, 46.00% +/- 2.48% from the medial tibial articular margin, respectively. The tibial tunnel position with the transtibial SB technique was located between the AM and PL tunnel positions formed with the transportal DB technique. CONCLUSIONS: Using the 3D-CT measuring method, the location of the tibia tunnel was between the AM and PL footprints, but the center of the femoral tunnel was at more shallow position from the AM bundle footprint when ACL reconstruction was performed by the transtibial SB technique.

Remnant Preservation is Helpful to Obtain Good Clinical Results in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison of Clinical Results of Three Techniques

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to compare the clinical results of 3 posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques according to the time from injury to surgery and remnant PCL status and to evaluate the efficiency of each technique. METHODS: The records of 89 patients who underwent primary PCL reconstructions with a posterolateral corner sling were analyzed retrospectively. Thirty-four patients were treated by anterolateral bundle (ALB) reconstruction with preservation of the remnant PCL using a transtibial tunnel technique in the acute and subacute stages of injury (group 1). Forty patients were treated with remnant PCL tensioning and an ALB reconstruction using the modified inlay technique in the chronic stage (group 2), and fifteen patients were treated with double-bundle reconstruction using the modified inlay technique (group 3). The double-bundle reconstruction was performed if there was a very weak or no PCL remnant. RESULTS: The mean side-to-side differences in posterior tibial translation on the stress radiographs were reduced from 10.1 +/- 2.5 mm in group 1, 10.6 +/- 2.4 mm in group 2, and 12.8 +/- 3.2 mm in group 3 preoperatively to 2.3 +/- 1.4 mm in group 1, 2.3 +/- 1.5 mm in group 2, and 4.0 +/- 2.5 mm in group 3 at the last follow-up (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). Statistical analyses revealed that group 1 and group 2 were similar in terms of side-to-side difference changes in posterior tibial translation on the stress radiographs; however, group 3 was inferior to group 1 and group 2 at the last follow-up (p = 0.022). The clinical results were not significantly different among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent posterior stability and good clinical results were achieved with ALB reconstruction preserving the injured remnant PCL in the acute and subacute stages and remnant PCL tensioning with ALB reconstruction in the chronic stage. The PCL injuries could be surgically corrected with different techniques depending on both the remnant PCL status and the interval between the knee trauma and operation.

Comparison of Tunnel Enlargement between Single and Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the tunnel enlargement in patients who had undergone a double-bundle (DB) or single-bundle (SB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, and to determine the correlation between the extent of bone tunnel enlargement and the clinical results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 224 primary ACL reconstructions performed from January 2004 to May 2008 we examined in this study 38 patients who underwent a SB-ACL reconstruction and 30 patients underwent a DB-ACL reconstruction. They were followed up over 1 year. The evaluation methods were the Lachman test, pivot-shift test and KT-1000 measurement for knee stability and the Lysholm score and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) ratings for the functional results. Tunnel enlargement was measured at the sclerotic ridge of the most widest area on the anteroposterior and lateral radiographs in longitudinal and vertical axis of the tunnel. RESULTS: The tunnel enlargement on the femoral side was similar in the DB-ACL group and the SB-ACL group. On the other hand, on the tibial side, the tunnel enlargement was less in the DB-ACL group than in the SB-ACL group (p=0.001, ICC: 0.94). The two groups showed different functional results and extent of stability recovery. The KT-1000 arthrometer revealed 1.1 mm and 93% of negative in the pivot-shift test for the DB-ACL group, which induced an improved tendency compared to the SB-ACL group. No correlation was found between the tunnel enlargement and clinical results. CONCLUSION: A DB-ACL reconstruction results in less tunnel enlargement on the tibial side than a SB-ACL reconstruction. There was no correlation between the tunnel enlargement and clinical results.

Relation between Second-look Arthroscopic Findings and Clinical Results after Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

PURPOSE: This study examined the relationship between the findings of a second-look arthroscopy and clinical results in double bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using hamstring tendons fixed with a Ligament Plate(R). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty eight cases of a double bundle ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons were retrospectively reviewed. The follow-up period was more than 1 year and all cases were reviewed by second-look arthroscopy. The average follow-up period was 20.6 months (range: 12-34 months). In second-look arthroscopy, the anteromedial (AM) bundle and posterolateral (PL) bundle of the grafts were evaluated based on the tension, rupture and synovial coverage. Clinical evaluation was assessed using the Lysholm score, international knee documentation committee score, Hop test, Lachman test, pivot shift test, KT-2000 arthrometer and anterior drawer stress radiograph using Telos(R) in 30degrees knee flexion. The correlation between the arthroscopic findings of the grafts and the instability tests was evaluated. RESULTS: The AM graft was evaluated as being taut in 89.3% and lax in 10.7%, and the PL graft was assessed as being taut in 71.4% and lax in 28.6% according to the tension. The AM and PL grafts were evaluated as 'no rupture' in 78.6% and 'partial rupture' in 21.4%. There was no 'complete rupture' in any graft. The AM grafts were found to be good in 53.6%, fair in 35.7% and poor in 10.7%; the PL grafts were assessed as good in 50.0%, fair in 28.6% and poor in 21.4% according to the synovial coverage. The AM graft tension showed statistically significant results regarding both the Lachman test (rho=0.743, p<0.001) and degree of rupture (rho=0.438, p=0.020). The PL graft tension showed statistically significant results regarding both the pivot shift test (rho=0.548, p=0.003) and the degree of rupture (rho=0.663, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Double bundle ACL reconstructions using hamstring tendons show good biological and clinical results. The graft tension and the degree of rupture show a statistically significant relationship to the stability of the reconstructed joint. On the other hand, the synovial coverage did not show a significant result.

Clinical Results of Technique for Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hybrid Femoral Fixation and Retroscrew

BACKGROUND: Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been presented as a means to more accurately restore the native anatomy of this ligament. This article describes a new method that uses a double bundle to perform ACL reconstruction and to evaluate the clinical outcome. METHODS: Grafts are tibialis anterior tendon allograft for anteromedial bundle (AMB) and hamstring tendon autograft without detachment of the tibial insertion for posterolateral bundle (PLB). This technique creates 2 tunnels in both the femur and tibia. Femoral fixation was done by hybrid fixation using Endobutton and Rigidfix for AMB and by biointerference screw for PLB. Tibial fixations are done by Retroscrew for AMB and by native insertion of hamstring tendon for PLB. Both bundles are independently and differently tensioned. We performed ACL reconstruction in 63 patients using our new technique. Among them, 47 participated in this study. The patients were followed up with clinical examination, Lysholm scales and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scoring system and radiological examination with a minimum 12 month follow-up duration. RESULTS: Significant improvement was seen on Lachman test and pivot-shift test between preoperative and last follow-up. Only one of participants had flexion contracture about 5 degrees at last follow-up. In anterior drawer test by KT-1000, authors found improvement from average 8.3 mm (range, 4 to 18 mm) preoperatively to average 1.4 mm (range, 0 to 6 mm) at last follow-up. Average Lysholm score of all patients was 72.7 +/- 8.8 (range, 54 to 79) preoperatively and significant improvement was seen, score was 92.2 +/- 5.3 (range, 74 to 97; p < 0.05) at last follow-up. Also IKDC score was normal in 35 cases, near normal in 11 cases, abnormal in 1 case at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our new double bundle ACL reconstruction technique used hybrid fixation and Retroscrew had favorable outcomes.

A Comparison of Arthroscopically Assisted Single and Double Bundle Tibial Inlay Reconstruction for Isolated Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the clinical results of arthroscopically assisted single and double bundle tibial inlay reconstructions of an isolated posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury. METHODS: This study reviewed the data for 14 patients who underwent a single bundle tibial inlay PCL reconstruction (Group A) and 16 patients who underwent a double bundle tibial inlay PCL reconstruction (Group B) between August 1999 and August 2002. The mean follow-up period in groups A and B was 90.5 months and 64 months, respectively. RESULTS: The Lysholm knee scores in groups A and B increased from an average of 43.3 +/- 7.04 and 44.7 +/- 5.02 preoperatively to 88.1 +/- 7.32 and 88.7 +/- 9.11 points at the final follow-up, respectively. In group A, stress radiography using a Telos device showed that the preoperative mean side-to-side differences (SSDs) of 9.5 +/- 1.60 mm at 30degrees of flexion and 9.8 +/- 1.70 mm at 90degrees of flexion were improved to 2.8 +/- 1.19 mm and 3.0 +/- 1.1 mm, respectively. In group B, the preoperative SSDs of 10.4 +/- 1.50 mm at 30degrees of flexion and 10.7 +/- 1.60 mm at 90degrees of flexion improved to 2.7 +/- 1.15 mm and 2.6 +/- 0.49 mm, respectively. There was no significant difference in the clinical scores and radiologic findings between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Single bundle and double bundle PCL reconstructions using the tibial inlay technique give satisfactory clinical results in patients with an isolated PCL injury, and there are no significant differences in the clinical and radiological results between the two techniques. These results suggest that it is unnecessary to perform the more technically challenging double bundle reconstruction using the tibial inlay technique in an isolated PCL injury.

Clinical and Radiologic Results of Transtibial Single Bundle Reconstruction and Double Bundle Reconstruction of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament Using the Allo-achilles Tendon / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: We performed transtibial single and double bundle reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament using the allo-achilles tendon and compared the results of single bundle reconstruction and double bundle reconstruction both clinically and radiologically. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 41 cases of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between February 2000 and June 2007 that had data available for at least 2 years of follow-up. Twenty-two cases (53.7%) underwent single bundle reconstruction and 19 cases (46.3%) underwent double bundle reconstruction. Clinical results were analyzed by Lysholm score and IKDC standards scale, and the radiologic results were analyzed by the Telos(R) posterior translation test. RESULTS: The average Lysholm score at last follow-up was 85.4+/-4.7 in the single bundle group and 87.5+/-5.1 in the double bundle group. IKDC scores were grade A in 4 (18.2%), grade B in 14 (63.6%) and grade C in 4 (18.2%) in the single bundle group; they were 1 (15.3%), 15 (78.9%) and 3 (15.8%) in the double bundle group. Telos(R) posterior translation test scores were 5.06 mm (3.04-7.43 mm) in the single bundle group, and 4.04 mm (2.18-7.20 mm) in the double bundle group. There was significant improvement in clinical and radiological scores in both groups (p0.05). CONCLUSION: Further study with longer term follow-up is needed.

The Relationship between the Evaluation of the Graft-bone Interface and the Clinical Results after Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

PURPOSE: This study examined the relationship between an evaluation of the graft-bone interface using magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography and the clinical results after double bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From December 2005 to October 2007, 15 cases that underwent double bundle ACL reconstruction and that were evaluated by MR arthrography were reviewed. The mean follow-up period was 20 months. The graft-bone interface was assessed by the leakage of contrast medium seen on MR arthrography. Four groups were classified according to the degree of contrast media leakage: no contrast media leakage, the focal type, the crescent type and the circumferential type. A functional evaluation was made using the Lysholm score, the international knee documentation committee (IKDC) score, the difference in the midthigh circumference and the Hop test. The stability was evaluated using a Lachmann test, a pivot shift test, a KT-2000 arthrometer and an anterior drawer stress radiograph using Telos(R) with the knee in 30degrees flexion. RESULTS: Ten cases showed no leakage of contrast media, five cases showed focal leakage and there was no case of crescent and circumferential leakage. The clinical results of the no leakage and focal leakage groups were compared. The functional evaluation such as the Lysholm score, the IKDC score, the difference in the midthigh circumference and the Hop test showed no significant difference between the two groups. The stability evaluation, such as the Lachmann test, the pivot shift test, the KT-2000 arthrometer and anterior drawer stress radiograph, also showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: On MR arthrography after double bundle ACL reconstruction, adequate osteointegration and satisfactory clinical results could be obtained in the no leakage and focal leakage groups.