ABSTRACT
@#AIM: To discuss the efficacy of fresnel prism in different types of binocular diplopia patients.<p>METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed 20 patients who received fresnel prism treatment between June 2018 and November 2020 in Jiangmen Central Hospital. Eight of them were diagnosed as acute acquired comitant esotropia, five patients were thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy, and seven patients were eye misalignment caused by cranial nerve palsies. The outcome measures were deviation, near stereoacuity, asthenopia and driving ability at pre-treatment and post-treatment.<p>RESULTS: The deviations were decreased after treatment. There were significant differences between pre-treatment and post-treatment(<i>P</i><0.05). The patients with acute acquired comitant esotropia or eye misalignment caused by cranial nerve palsies recovered near stereoacuity meanwhile significant difference between before and after treatment(<i>P</i><0.05). There were no significant differences between before and after treatment in patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy(<i>P</i>>0.05). Thirteen patients recovered in the driving ability while fifteen patients were cured of asthenopia. There were significant differences between before and after treatment(all <i>P</i><0.05).<p>CONCLUSION: Fresnel prism treatment could decrease deviations in binocular diplopia patients, improved near stereoacuity and quality of life.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the characteristics of individuals with mental disorders suspected of road traffic offences and to find their differences from normal offenders, in order to regulate mental disorder patients' driving activities and prevent road traffic offences. Methods One hundred and twenty-three cases of forensic psychiatry testimony of individuals suspected of road traffic offences between 2014 and 2019 from the West China Forensic Center of Sichuan Province were collected. Fisher exact probability test was used to compare the differences between offenders with mental disorders and without mental disorders in terms of demographic characteristics, criminological characteristics, psychiatric characteristics and criminal responsibilities. Results There was no statistical significance in the differences of demographic characteristics, vehicles and kinds of alcohol between the two groups （P>0.05）. The main type of road traffic related crimes committed by offenders with mental disorders was risky driving and were mainly evaluated as partial criminal responsibility, whereas most offenders without mental disorders committed crime of causing traffic casualties and all were evaluated as full criminal responsibility. There was statistical significance in the differences of the types of crime and the criminal responsibility rating between the two groups （P<0.05）. Meanwhile, patients with mental disorders were characterized by long course of disease and irregular treatment, and individuals diagnosed as having mental disorders caused by psychoactive substances accounted for a large proportion. Conclusion There are differences in the characteristics of road traffic-related crimes between mental disorder patients and normal people. It is of great practical significance for reducing road traffic offences to evaluate whether the individuals with mental disorders are fit for driving.
Subject(s)
Humans , Automobile Driving , China/epidemiology , Crime , Criminals , Forensic Psychiatry , Mental Disorders/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We tried to evaluate the driving ability of stroke patients using Cognitive Behavioral Driver's Inventory (CBDI), Psychological Software Service, U.S.A. to find out whether it is helpful in predicting the outcome of driving rehabilitation. METHOD: Subjects were 18 stroke patients who had driven a car before the stroke. Each patient was evaluated with CBDI and got a driving test. We compared driving test results with CBDI scores. RESULTS: Average CBDI score was 63.0 +/- 19.3. There was no significant difference according to lesion sides or types of stroke. Average score of driving test was 85.3 +/- 10.9. Twelve of 18 subjects passed the driving test and six subjects failed. Average score among right hemiplegics was significantly higher than that of left hemiplegics (p<0.05). Average CBDI score of the subjects who passed the driving test was 52.3 +/- 4.7, while that of the failed subjects was 84.7 +/- 19.6. There was significant difference in CBDI score between 2 groups (p<0.05). Among the 28 items of CBDI, 11 items including brake reaction time, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised Picture Completion showed significant correlation with the total score of the driving test (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: CBDI can be used as a useful tool for predicting driving ability of stroke patients.