ABSTRACT
T hese external and internal signs of drow ning are non-specific. T herefore, diagnosis of drow n-ing is alw ays one of the m ost difficult tasks in forensic pathology. T his paper m eticulously and com pre-hensively review s research progress on the diagnosis of drow ning in pathological signs, laboratory exam i-nation, im m unohistochem istry test and virtopsy technology, and it also prospects the research direction of diagnosis of drow ning.
ABSTRACT
Objective T o detect diatom in the organs of drow ners by enzym e com bined w ith strong acid digestion m ethod, and evaluate its application value. Methods A total of 40 cases w hich have been identified as drow ning in local region w ere collected. Sam ples of the lung, liver, kidney, and the w ater of the scene w ere also gathered from each case. Strong acid digestion m ethod, enzym e com bined w ith strong acid digestion m ethod, and enzym ic digestion m ethod w ere respectively perform ed to detect the diatom in the sam ples. T he com parative analysis w as m ade on digestion tim e, digestive pow er and de-tection rate of diatom , etc. Results E nzym e com bined w ith strong acid digestion m ethod w as significant-ly better than enzym ic digestion m ethod on digestion tim e and digestive pow er;enzym e com bined w ith strong acid digestion m ethod w ere obviously superior to strong acid digestion m ethod on the detection rate of diatom . Conclusion E nzym e com bined w ith strong acid digestion m ethod com bines the advan-tages of strong acid digestion m ethod and enzym ic digestion m ethod. It has the characters of operation safety w ith little pollution to environm ent, w hich is w orthy of further popularization and practice.
ABSTRACT
Objective To com pare and explore the application value of diatom nitric acid digestion method and plankton 16S rDNA PCR method for drow ning identification. Methods Forty drow ning cases from 2010 to 2011 were collected from Department of Forensic Medicine of Wenzhou Medical University. Sam ples including lung, kidney, liver and field water fromeach case were tested with diatom nitric acid digestion method and plankton 16S rDNAPCR method, respectively. The Diatom nitric acid digestion method and plankton 16S rDNAPCR method required 20 gand 2g of each organ,and 15 mL and 1.5 mL of field water, respectively. The inspection time and detection rate were com pared between the two methods. Results Diatom nitric acid digestion method m ainly detected two species of diatom s, Centriae and Pennatae, while plankton 16S rDNA PCR method am plified a length of 162 bp band. The average inspection time of each case of the Diatom nitric acid digestion method was (95.30±2.78) min less than (325.33±14.18)min of plankton 16S rDNA PCR method (P<0.05).The detection rates of two methods for field water and lung were both 100% . For liver and kidney, the detection rate of plankton 16S rDNA PCR method was both 80% , higher than 40% and 30% of diatom nitric acid digestion method (P<0.05), respectively. Conclusion The laboratory testing method needs to be appropriately selected according to the specific circum stances in the forensic appraisal of drow ning. Com pared with diatom nitric acid digestion method, plankton 16S rDNA PCR method has practice values with such advantages as less quantity of sam ples, huge inform ation and high specificity.
ABSTRACT
Objection To observe the change rules of quantity and species of diatom sin Hunhe River in Shenyang and to provide technology and scientific evidence for drow ning identification and the location of drow ning in forensic investigation. Methods In 2011, different locations for collecting water sam pleswere chosen in Hunhe River in Shenyang. Water sam pleswere collected and variation of quantity and species of diatom swere observed every month. And variation of dom inant species of diatom swas ob-served every week. Results The quantity, speciesand dom inant species of diatom sin Hunhe River in Shenyang varied with different tim eand locations. The quantity and species of diatom swere lowest from Decem ber to February and gradually increased, reaching peak in May and second peak in October, and then gradually decreased. The dom inant species of diatom s varied significantly adjacent two weeksat same location from April to N ovem ber, but had little changesat different locationsin same week from July to August. Conclusion The change rules of quantity and species of diatom sare com plicated and affected by various factors such as environm ent and hydrology. The change rules of speciesand quantity of diatom s should be considered in forensic investigation of drow ning identification and the lo-cation of drow ning.