Elective carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection

@#Objective: It is aimed to present our experience in carotid artery stenting with attention to the patient selection, technique, success rate, perioperative complications, and efficacy. Methods: Patients presented with carotid stenosis treated by stenting were included. Symptomatic patients were defined as having a history of transient ischemic attack or stroke in the last 6 months. Patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis of at least 50% or asymptomatic carotid stenosis of at least 70% detected by catheter angiography were accepted for treatment. Distal embolic protection devices were used in all patients. Technical success was defined as the luminal patency at least 70%. Results: The study consisted of 94 patients with 98 procedures and the mean age was 66.38±11.13 years. The mean stenosis rate was 74.52±13.44%. A total of 109 stents were used in 97 procedures, and closed-cell design was used in 87.2% versus open-cell design in 12.8%. Technical success and complication rate were 98.9% and 8.2%, respectively. The mean follow-up period was 14.92±10.76 months. Conclusion: Carotid artery stenting with use of distal embolic protection devices is widely accepted, safe, feasible, less invasive when compared to surgery and can be performed successfully especially in patients with high risk factors.

Late Coil Migration after Embolization of Cerebral Aneurysms ­ Case Series

Background Coil migration after cerebral aneurysm embolization is a very rare complication. It can take place early or late in the postoperative period, evolving asymptomatic and causing severe neurological deficits. Ruptured aneurysms of anterior communicant artery were the most frequent reported examples in the literature. Case Report We report three cases of patients with unruptured aneurysms treated with coils and remodeling balloon technique. The first case was that of a left posterior communicating artery aneurysm with coil migration to a distal cortical branch of ipsilateral middle cerebral artery (MCA). The patient had mild paresthesia in the arm for a few days. The second one was a fenestrated basilar artery aneurysm with coil migration to the P2 segment of the left posterior cerebral artery. The patient was fully asymptomatic. The third case was a MCA aneurysm with coil migration to the M3 segment. There were no ischemic complications, and all patients underwent a new endovascular procedure. Conclusions Coil migration is a rare but not always severe complication. Antiplatelet agents are recommended even if the coil migration is asymptomatic.

Introdução A migração de coil após embolização de aneurisma cerebral é uma complicação muito rara. Ela pode ocorrer no período pós-operatório tanto precoce quanto tardio, evoluindo assintomático ou causando graves déficits neurológicos. Aneurismas rotos da artéria comunicador anterior foram os exemplos mais frequentes relatados na literatura. Relato de Caso Relatamos três casos de pacientes com aneurismas não rotos tratados com coils e técnica de remodelagem com balão. O primeiro caso foi de um aneurisma de artéria comunicante posterior com migração do coil para um ramo cortical distal da artéria cerebral média (ACM) ipsilateral. A paciente apresentou parestesia leve no braço por alguns dias. O segundo foi um aneurisma de artéria basilar fenestrada com migração de coil para o segmento P2 da artéria cerebral posterior esquerda. O paciente ficou totalmente assintomático. O terceiro caso foi de um aneurisma de ACM com migração do coil para o segmento M3. Não houve complicações isquêmicas, e todos os pacientes foram submetidos a novo procedimento endovascular. Conclusões Migração de coil é uma complicação rara, mas nem sempre grave. Antiagregantes plaquetários são recomendados mesmo se a migração do coil for assintomática.

Low Common Carotid Artery Systolic Occlusion Pressure and Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis Are Associated with Development of Neurologic Intolerance during Proximal Protected Carotid Artery Stenting

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Neurologic intolerance (NI) is defined as the occurrence of neurological symptoms during carotid artery stenting (CAS). Because NI is inevitable problem, it may be helpful to anticipate its occurrence. So, we studied factors associated with NI during proximal protected CAS. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients underwent proximal protected CAS from August 2012 to January 2017. RESULTS: We included total 123 patients (109 males, 72±8 years old). The total procedure time was 43±12 minutes, and mean occlusion time was 4.8±1.2 minutes. We divided CAS patients into 2 groups according to presence of NI; neurologic tolerance (NT; n=74, 60%) and NI (n=49, 40%) groups. After the univariate analysis, symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (p = 0.003), absence of anterior communicating artery (p = 0.015) and low common carotid artery occlusion pressure (CCAOP, p < 0.001) were associated with NI. After the multivariate analysis, NI was significantly associated with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (odds ratio [OR], 5.549; p = 0.014) and systolic CCAOP≤42 mmHg (OR, 6.461; p < 0.001). In NI group, 43 patients (88%) recovered right after the balloon deflation and 2 patients were normalized within 2 hours. However, 1 had major stroke and 3 had minor strokes in 4 patients with persistent NI ≥24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: About 40% showed NI during the CAS. Most of them (88%, 43 of 49 patients) recovered after the balloon deflation, but stroke incidence was significantly higher in NI group. Symptomatic carotid artery stenosis and systolic CCAOP ≤42 mmHg were significantly associated with the development of NI during proximal protected CAS.