ABSTRACT
Abstract Objective To evaluate clinical characteristics, maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women who underwent surgery for adnexal torsion (AT). Methods All patients, who underwent surgical operation due to AT during pregnancy at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Ege University between 2005 and 2020 were retrospectively investigated. Main clinical and perioperative outcomes were evaluated. Results A total of 21 patients who underwent surgery due to AT during pregnancy were included. Of all patients, 61.9% underwent laparoscopy and the remaining 38.1% underwent laparotomy. The most common surgical procedure was adnexal detorsion in both groups (48%). Mean gestational age at the time of diagnosis, duration of surgery and hospitalization were significantly lower in the laparoscopy group, when compared with the laparotomy group (p=0.006, p=0.001, and p=0.001, respectively.) One of the patients had an infection during the postoperative period. Spontaneous abortion was only observed in one case. Conclusion It can be concluded that the surgical intervention implemented for the exact diagnosis and treatment of AT (laparotomy or laparoscopy) did not have an unfavorable effect on pregnancy outcomes such as abortion, preterm delivery, and fetal anomaly. However, laparoscopy may be superior to laparotomy in terms of advantages.
Resumo Objetivo Avaliar as características clínicas, e os desfechos maternos e fetais em gestantes submetidas à cirurgia de torção anexial. Métodos Todas as pacientes operadas por torção anexial durante a gravidez no Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Ege entre 2005 e 2020 foram investigadas retrospectivamente. Os principais resultados clínicos e perioperatórios foram avaliados. Resultados Foraminclusas 21 pacientes operadas por torção anexial durante a gravidez. De todos as pacientes, 61,9% foramsubmetidas à laparoscopia e as 38,1% restantes foram submetidas à laparotomia. O procedimento cirúrgico mais comum foi apenas a destorção anexialemambos os grupos (48%).Aidade gestacionalmédia nomomento do diagnóstico, a duração da operação e da hospitalização foram significativamentemenores no grupo de laparoscopia em comparação com o grupo de laparotomia (p=0,006, p=0,001 e p=0,001, respectivamente.) Uma das pacientes teve uma infecção no pós-operatório. Apenas em um caso observamos aborto espontâneo. Conclusão Pode-se concluir que a intervenção cirúrgica implementada para o diagnóstico exato e tratamento da torção anexial (laparotomia ou laparoscopia) não teve efeito desfavorável nos desfechos da gravidez, como aborto, parto prematuro e anomalia fetal. No entanto, a laparoscopia pode ser superior à laparotomia em termos de vantagens.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Ovarian Torsion/surgeryABSTRACT
Objective: Whether or not emergent decompression/fusion surgery for paralysis caused by metastatic spinal tumors of unknown origin improves patient neurological outcome and survival remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of emergent decompression/fusion surgery for paralysis caused by spinal tumors of unknown or not previously diagnosed origin.Patients and Methods: Data from the medical records of 11 patients with spinal tumors of unknown origin (study group) were compared with those of 15 patients with metastatic spinal tumors of known origin (control group). The outcome measures were postoperative performance status, motor function evaluated with the Frankel grade, and actual survival after surgery as compared with the estimated survival calculated using the Tokuhashi score. χ2 analyses were performed to evaluate differences between the groups.Results: The mean performance status was 3.6 preoperatively, which improved to 2.9 postoperatively (P<0.05), in the unknown origin group and 3.6 preoperatively, which improved to 2.7 postoperatively (P<0.05), in the control group. Seven patients (64%) in the unknown origin group showed improvement in paralysis by ≥1 Frankel grade. By contrast, only 4 patients (27%) in the control group showed improvement in paralysis. The unknown origin group tended to show better improvement (P=0.05). All the patients in the unknown origin group underwent adjuvant therapy after definitive diagnosis following surgery. The unknown origin group showed a slight tendency toward better survival than toward the estimated survival.Conclusion: Emergent decompression/fusion surgery for patients with paralysis caused by metastatic tumors of unknown origin is potentially useful for diagnosing tumor origin and improving neurological outcomes and performance status, and thus for extending survival.