Exploration of blended teaching based on "Rain Class" in general practitioner training / 中华医学教育探索杂志

Objective To explore the effect of blended teaching model based on "Rain Class" in general practitioner training.Methods Random sampling method was adopted in which totally 132 general practitioners were divided into two groups,66 in experimental group,66 in the control group.Blended teaching method and traditional teaching method was implemented in the experimental group and the control group,respectively.At the end of the course,unified examination questions were used to evaluate the teaching effect,and questionnaires were used to investigate the students' evaluation of the "rain classroom" teaching method.Results The final exam score of experimental group was significantly higher than that of control group [(82.95 ± 12.86) vs.(60.45 ± 18.91),P=0.000].Further stratification analysis was conducted according to educational background,and the average score of low education group in the observation group was significantly higher than that of high education group [(88.06 ± 9.12) vs.(49.66 ± 13.88),P=0.000].55.3％ of the general practitioners in experimental group were very satisfied with "Rain Class" teaching,34.8％ satisfied,and only 9.9％ of the general practitioners were dissatisfied.Conclusion Blended teaching model could help to promote the exchange and interaction between students and teachers and improve learning efficiency and clinical ability.

Assessment of community health service ability of general practitioners after standardized training in Shanghai / 中华全科医师杂志

Objective To assess community health service ability of general practitioners (GPs) with the Standardized General Practitioner Training(SGPT) in Shanghai.Methods One hundred and four GPs receiving SGPT and matched 102 GPs without SGPT were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study from September to November in 2014.Community health service ability,including abilities in basic medical service and public health service were assessed and compared between two groups.Written examination was applied in the public health services ability assessment.Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) was applied for evaluation of basic medical service abilities.Results The scores of written examination in GPs with SGPT were higher than those without SGPT[(66 ±4) vs.(62 ±7),P ＜0.01].The OSCE scores in GP with SGPT were higher than those without SGPT [(494 ± 78) vs.(448 ± 80),P ＜ 0.01].GPs with SGPT also abtained the higher scores in consultation competence and clinical skills assessment [(245 ± 44) vs.(225 ±40),P＜0.01;(252 ±59) vs.(225 ±61),P ＜0.01].In OSCE,GPs with SGPT got higher score than those without SGPT in 5 stations (medical history collection,doctor-patient communication,basic operation,ECG interpretation,and CPR) (all P ＜ 0.01);however,no significant differences were observed in 3 stations (physical examination,case analysis and X-ray interpretation) between two groups (all P ＞ 0.05).Conclusions GPs with SGPT have better basic medical service and public health service ability.But some aspects of basic medical service ability need to be strengthened in the training and practice.

The cultivation and strategy of scientific research capacity on general practitioner standardization training / 中华医学科研管理杂志

To state the importance of scientific research capability and general practitioners training for the poor scientific innovation conditions of general practitioner standardization training by the analysis of several ways to improve the scientific research capacity and the probe of the impact on strengthening the consciousness of scientific research to help general practitioner to better work in the areas of primary care and public health.

Managing Mental Illness in Primary Care: General Practitioners’ Perspective

The Agency for Integrated Care (AIC) conducted a survey to determine the specific areas in which the agency could work with General Practitioners (GPs) to enhance mental illness management in Singapore. This survey was conducted as part of AIC’s engagement strategy and because the Primary Care Surveys 2010 and 2005 noted that a sizeable number of mental health cases are seen by GPs. Face-to-face interviews were conducted among a random sample of 849 group and non-group GPs. The GPs practise in four geographical districts in Singapore. 500 responses were obtained. 70% of the respondent GPs indicated that they were seeing patients with mental illness. Anxiety and depression were the most commonly seen mental conditions. The lack of available drugs and facilities in the clinic, and unfamiliarity with mental health patient management were the main reasons that GPs do not see patients with mental illness. 39% of the GPs referred patients to a psychologist. 36% of the GPs referred patients to a counsellor. Availability of additional allied health services in the neighbourhood was crucial in encouraging GPs to see more patients with mental illness. General geriatrics, dementia, general mental health and major depression were the areas of interest for further training.