ABSTRACT
We report a case of 76 year-old woman who had previously undergone coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with the right internal thoracic artery (RITA) bypassed to the left anterior descending artery. Six years after CABG, she developed acute type A aortic dissection, and she was medically treated because the false lumen was thrombosed and it was considered that surgical intervention would be high risk for the patent RITA graft crossing between the sternum and the ascending aorta. During follow-up, her aortic aneurysm enlarged to 57 mm in diameter, and finally she was referred to our hospital for surgical intervention. In this case, preservation of the patent RITA graft was thought to be critical because the RITA graft was the only blood source for the left anterior descending artery. Prior to re-median sternotomy, we performed a right anterior minithoracotomy to make sufficient space between the sternum and the RITA graft, and then instituted peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass to decompress the heart. After re-sternotomy, we ensured minimum dissection of the RITA graft, and we successfully accomplished graft replacement of the ascending aorta to the aortic arch without injuring the patent RITA graft. In cases with a patent RITA graft and an ascending aortic aneurysm close to the sternum, our strategy is considered to be efficient for re-median sternotomy.
ABSTRACT
To improve the long-term clinical results of coronary artery bypass grafting, we evaluated our graft selections and the designs that were used, in relation to the quality of the anastomoses and patient backgrounds. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 505 patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting involving more than 3 vessel reconstructions between May 1999 and March 2007. Neither the selection of a saphenous vein graft nor that of an internal thoracic artery graft was a statistically significant cardiac event factor. The cardiac event-free rates (at 1 and 5 years) according to anastomotic site were as follows : a) 92.9% and 76.6% for a radial artery graft and 93.2% and 83.9% for a saphenous vein graft at the right coronary artery ; b) 93.0% and 70.3% for a radial artery graft and 95.1% and 80.4% for a saphenous vein graft at the distal right coronary artery ; c) 94.5% and 77.8% for a left internal thoracic artery graft and 93.0% and available for a right internal thoracic artery graft at the left anterior descending artery ; d) 96.5% and 79.8% for a radial artery graft, 93.0% and 78.0% for a saphenous vein graft, and 91.3% and 75.6% for an internal thoracic artery graft at the left circumflex artery. Significant cardiac event factors were dialysis (risk ratio, 5.28 ; <i>p</i><0.001), the use of a right gastroepiploic artery graft as the inflow blood vessel of a radial artery graft (risk ratio, 5.75 ; <i>p</i>=0.02), and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (risk ratio, 1.62 ; <i>p</i>=0.03). As a tendency toward more frequent early-stage cardiac events among patients with radial artery grafts was confirmed, careful follow-up is important for this group of patients. Right gastroepiploic artery grafts should be chosen carefully with full consideration of the anastomotic site quality and the flow demand, as the blood supply capability of such grafts is limited. For dialysis patients, although the mid-term clinical results are still being evaluated, a saphenous vein grafts have bwer early-stage of cardiac events. In younger patients, off-pump bypass is not the only treatment method available, and revascularization with extracorporeal circulation can reliably achieve good long-term results. To improve the long-term clinical results for coronary artery bypass grafts, graft selection and design should be carefully considered on a case-by-case basis. The quality of the anastomotic site and the patient background are important factors, especially with regard to the selection of a saphenous vein graft or a right gastroepiploic artery graft. A radial artery graft should be selected for use in relatively young patients because of its superior patency. Off-pump bypass may not necessarily be the treatment of choice in some cases because revascularization using extracorporeal circulation can reliably achieve better long-term results.