ABSTRACT
AIM: To evaluate the clinical effect of toric implantable collamer lens(TICL)V4c for correcting moderate to high myopia with high astigmatism using vector analysis and quality of life impact of refractive correction(QIRC).METHODS: Retrospective case series. A total of 55 patients(90 eyes)with moderate to high myopia and high astigmatism who received TICL V4c implantation in the refraction surgery center of ophthalmology department in our hospital from January 2019 to December 2022 were collected. Followed-up for 1 a, the uncorrected distance visual acuity(UDVA), best corrected visual acuity(BCVA)and diopters were observed. Alpins vector analysis was used to evaluate the effect of astigmatism correction, and QIRC scale was used to evaluate patients' quality of life.RESULTS: At 1 a postoperatively, the UDVA of 98% eyes was the same or better than pre-operative BCVA, the safety index was 1.11±0.14, and the efficacy index was 1.11±0.15. The angle of error of 97% of the astigmatic eyes was within ±15°. The results of vector analysis showed that correction index was 0.83±0.13, angle of error was 1.00±4.49°, and index of success was 0.21±0.15. The total higher order aberrations under a pupil diameter of 6 mm was significantly increased compared with preoperatively(P<0.05), the QIRC score was significantly better than that before surgery(P<0.001), and the increase of total QIRC scores was positively correlated with preoperative spherical equivalent(rs=0.215, P<0.05), indicating that the higher degree of myopia before surgery the patients, the better the quality of life after TICL implantation.CONCLUSION: TICL V4c implantation for the correction of moderate to high myopia with high astigmatism is safe and effective, and the patients' quality of life significantly improved after surgery.
ABSTRACT
AIM:To explore the effect of base curve aspheric orthokeratology lens in the treatment of adolescents with myopia and moderate to high astigmatism, and its influence on ocular surface morphology and tears.METHODS:A total of 232 adolescents(464 eyes)with myopia and moderate to high astigmatism treated in the hospital from December 2018 to March 2020 were selected as the research subjects. They were randomly divided into control group(116 patients, 232 eyes)and observation group(116 patients, 232 eyes). The control group was treated with base curve spheric orthokeratology lens, while the observation group was treated with base curve aspheric orthokeratology lens. Comparison was made between the two groups in terms of the correction effect, objective visual quality, ocular surface morphology, tears related indicators before and after wearing the lenses, and the incidence of complications after wearing the lenses for 12mo.RESULTS:After wearing the lenses, the uncorrected visual acuity(UCVA)and diopter of the two groups were significantly improved. The UCVA and diopter of the observation group were significantly better than those of the control group(all P<0.05). After wearing the lenses, the whole-eye and corneal coma, spherical aberrations and high-order aberrations were significantly increased, while Strehl ratio and modulation transfer function were decreased in the two groups. Trefoil aberrations was significantly increased(all P<0.05). These indicators in the observation group were better than those in the control group(all P<0.05). After wearing the lenses, the epithelium fluorescence staining scores, ocular surface disease index(OSDI)scores were significantly decreased in the two groups(P<0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05); The noninvasive tear breakup time(NI-BUT)of the two groups were significantly decreased after wearing the lenses(P<0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05). The Schirmer Ⅰ test and tear meniscus height of the two groups showed no statistically significant difference before and after wearing the lenses(P>0.05). The incidence rates of complications in the observation group and the control group after wearing the lenses were close(6.9% vs 6.0%, P >0.05).CONCLUSION:Base curve aspheric orthokeratology lens is superior to base curve spheric orthokeratology lens in the treatment of adolescents with myopia and moderate to high astigmatism in terms of correction effect and objective visual quality. The two lenses have similar influence on ocular surface morphology and tears.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation with simultaneous full thickness astigmatic keratotomy (FTAK) for the correction of moderate to high myopic astigmatism. METHODS: Thirty-two eyes of 16 patients who had an ICL implantation with simultaneous FTAK were studied. Follow-up visits were at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months. The outcome measures included the uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), refractive error, efficacy, safety, and predictability. RESULTS: After the surgery, astigmatism was reduced by 74.83 ± 13.8%. The proportion of eyes with a spherical equivalent of 0.5 D or less was 87.5%, and all eyes had a spherical equivalent of 1.0 D or less at 3 months after the surgery. The proportion of eyes with a UDVA of 20/25 or better was 100%, and 20/20 or better was 81.25%. Reoperation was needed in one case (3.1%) because of undercorrection of the astigmatism, and no complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that ICL implantation with simultaneous FTAK is effective and safe for the correction of moderate to high myopic astigmatism.
Subject(s)
Humans , Astigmatism , Follow-Up Studies , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Refractive Errors , Reoperation , Visual AcuityABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of a combined procedure of astigmatic keratotomy (AK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for the correction of high astigmatism. METHODS: Thirty-five eyes of 19 patients who had astigmatic keratotomy were studied. The patients had a secondary procedure, LASIK, to correct the residual refractive error. Follow-up visits were at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. The outcome measures included uncorrected distance visual acuity, refractive error, efficacy, safety, and predictability. We compared preoperative and post-AK expected corneal ablation depth using an Amaris Ablation depth table. RESULTS: After astigmatic keratotomy, astigmatism was reduced by 61.43 ± 14.62%, and after LASIK, astigmatism was reduced by 91.65 ± 8.68%. Expected corneal ablation depth was reduced by 18.72 ± 11.77% after astigmatic keratotomy. The proportion of eyes with spherical equivalent 0.5 D or less was 85.71% at 6 months after the combined procedure of astigmatic keratotomy and LASIK. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed the combined procedure of astigmatic keratotomy and LASIK is effective for visual acuity, refraction, and reduction in corneal ablation depth.
Subject(s)
Humans , Astigmatism , Follow-Up Studies , Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Postoperative Complications , Refractive Errors , Visual AcuityABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the beveled, full thickness astigmatic keratotomy. METHODS: This study included 185 eyes of 112 patients treated with beveled, full thickness astigmatic keratotomy. Treated eyes were divided into 3 groups: beveled, full thickness astigmatic keratotomy after implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation (group A), beveled, full thickness astigmatic keratotomy after cataract surgery (group B) and beveled, full thickness astigmatic keratotomy alone (group C). Follow-up visits were at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months. The outcome measures included uncorrected distance visual acuity, astigmatism, efficacy, safety and predictability. RESULTS: At 6 months postoperatively, astigmatism was significantly reduced: 68.9 +/- 18.24% in total, 69.24 +/- 20.76%, in the group A, 67.84 +/- 17.56% in the group B and 67.82 +/- 13.97% in the group C. The proportion of eyes with astigmatism 1.0 or less was 88.65% in total, 91.49% in the group A, 87.5% in the group B and 70.0% in the group C. Mean improvement in corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 0.56 lines; no eyes lost 2 lines of CDVA after 6 months postoperatively. Postoperative complications were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed the beveled, full thickness astigmatic keratotomy is effective and safe for correcting astigmatism alone as well as correcting astigmatism after ICL implantation or cataract surgery.