ABSTRACT
Abstract Introduction Oral H1 antihistamines are the first-line treatment for patients with allergic rhinitis, while it is uncertain which kind and dosage of the antihistamines are more effective in improving symptoms of patients. Objective To evaluate the efficacy of different oral H1 antihistamine treatments on patients with allergic rhinitis by performing a network meta-analysis. Methods The search was executed in PubMed, Embase, OVID, the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov for relevant studies. The network meta-analysis was performed by using Stata 16.0, and the outcome measures of the analysis were symptom score reductions of patients. Relative risks with 95% Confidence Intervals were used in the network meta-analysis to compare the clinical effect of treatments involved, and Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curves (SUCRAs) were also calculated to rank the treatments' efficacy. Results 18 eligible randomized controlled studies, involving a total of 9419 participants, were included in this meta-analysis. All the antihistamine treatments outperformed placebo in total symptom score reduction and each individual symptom score reduction. According to the results of SUCRA, rupatadine 20 mg and rupatadine 10 mg were ranked relatively high in reductions of total symptom score (SUCRA: 99.7%, 76.3%), nasal congestion score (SUCRA: 96.4%, 76.4%), rhinorrhea score (SUCRA: 96.6%, 74.6%) and ocular symptom score (SUCRA: 97.2%, 88.8%); rupatadine 20 mg and levocetirizine 5 mg were ranked relatively high in reductions of nasal itching score (SUCRA: 84.8%, 83.4%) and sneezing score (SUCRA: 87.3%, 95.4%); loratadine 10 mg was ranked the lowest in each symptom score reduction besides placebo. Conclusion This study suggests that rupatadine is the most effective in alleviating symptoms of patients with allergic rhinitis among different oral H1 antihistamine treatments involved, and rupatadine 20 mg performs better than rupatadine 10 mg. While loratadine 10 mg has inferior efficacy for patients to the other antihistamine treatments.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To observe the effect of acupoint injection at "Yingxiang"(LI 20) and "Yintang"(GV 29) on nasal allergic reactions and the expression of histamine receptor H 1 and H 4 in nasal mucosa of allergic rhinitis (AR) rats, so as to reveal its mechanism underlying improvement of AR. METHODS: SD rats were randomized into normal, model, non-acupoint injection and acupoint injection groups (n=8 in each). The AR model was established by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of mixture of ovalbumin, aluminium hydroxide gel and normal saline (once every other day, for 7 times), and nasal drip of ovalbumin (on the following day of i.p.for 7 days). The mixture solution of lidocaine, dexamethasone (DXM) and transfer factor (0.1 mL/acupoint or non-acupoint) was injected into bilateral LI 20 and GV 29 in the acupoint injection group, or into the non-acupoints (about 5 cm below the armpit on both sides, and the middle point between the left "Houhai"[GV 1] and "Huantiao"[GB 30]), on the 1st , 5th, 9th, and 13th day after modeling. Symptoms of sneezing, nasal discharge, nose-rubbing, etc. were scored after the treatment. The expression levels of H1 R and H4 R proteins and genes in the nasal mucosa tissue were determined using immunohistochemistry and quantitative real-time PCR, respectively. RESULTS: Compared with the normal group, the symptom score and the expression levels of H1 R, H4 R proteins and genes in nasal mucosa were significantly increased in the model group (P0.05), suggesting a specificity of the effect of acupoint injection. CONCLUSION: Acupoint injection can relieve the allergic symptoms of AR rats, which may be related to its effects in down-regulating the over expression of H1 R and H4 R proteins and genes in the nasal mucosa.
ABSTRACT
Objetivo: Revisar a eficácia e segurança dos principais anti-histamínicos de primeira e segunda geração. Os anti-histamínicos correspondem a um grupo extenso de medicamentos que vêm apresentando grandes avanços no conhecimento de suas ações e estão entre os agentes mais utilizados na prática clínica em diversas doenças alérgicas. Método: Levantamento bibliográfico nos bancos de dados PubMed, Medline, LILACS, SCIELO e capítulos de livros nos últimos 10 anos, sendo incluídos artigos históricos. Resultados: Nessa revisão são destacadas as principais características da histamina, as diferenças entre os receptores de histamina, o desenvolvimento dos anti-histamínicos de primeira e segunda geração, sua classificação e os principais efeitos colaterais de cada grupo de anti-histamínicos. Conclusão: A presente revisão não pretende esgotar o assunto sobre eficácia e segurança dos anti-histamínicos, mas destaca a falta de estudos bem conduzidos sobre eficácia dos anti-histamínicos de primeira geração e o número crescente de metanálises sobre farmacodinâmica, potência, eficácia e segurança dos anti-histamínicos de segunda geração.
Objective: To review the efficacy and safety of the main antihistamines of first and second generation. The antihistamines represent an extensive group of drugs that are showing great advances in knowledge of their actions and are among the most common agents used in clinical practice in various allergic diseases. Method: Searches in PubMed, Medline, LILACS, SCIELO database and book chapters in the last 10 years, including historic articles. Results: This review highlights the main features of histamine, the differences between histamine receptors, development of first and second generation antihistamines, their classification, and the main side effects of each group of antihistamines. Conclusion: The present review is not intended to exhaust the subject on efficacy and safety of antihistamine, but it highlights the lack of well conducted studies of the efficacy of first-generation antihistamine and the rising number of meta-analysis of pharmacodynamics, potency, efficacy and safety of second-generation antihistamines.
Subject(s)
Humans , Allergens , Histamine H1 Antagonists/adverse effects , /adverse effects , /adverse effects , Histamine , Histamine Antagonists , Hypersensitivity , Receptors, Histamine , Receptors, Histamine H1 , Receptors, Histamine H2 , Methods , Patients , Methods , Diagnostic Techniques and ProceduresABSTRACT
AIM To study the mRNA expression of histamine H_1 receptor in hepatocarcinoma of rats. METHODS Dimethylamino-azobenzene (DAB) was used to induce hepatocarcinoma in rats. Semi-quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was adopted to analyse the relative expression of histamine H_1 receptor. And the base sequence of its PCR product was detected. RESULTS The relative mRNA expression of histamine H_1 receptor was significantly decreased in hepatic carcinoma tissue, compared with that part far from cancer and control group (P