Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Infection Control ; (4): 203-206, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-512141

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate prognosis and related factors of infectious pancreatic necrosis(IPN) caused by multidrug-resistant organisms(MDROs).Methods Clinical data of 53 IPN patients admitted to a hospital between October 2010 and March 2016 were analyzed retrospectively,patients were divided into MDRO infection group and common bacterial infection group according to antimicrobial resistance of pathogens isolated from peripancreatic drainge fluid,prognosis and related factors of two groups were compared.Results Among 53 IPN patients with confirmed evidence for pathogenicity,33(62.3%)were in MDRO infection group,and 20(37.7%)were in common bacterial infection group,the most common MDROs isolated from peripancreatic drainage was multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MDRO-AB) (37.5%,18/48).The mortality of IPN patients was 30.2% (16/53),mortality of MDRO infection group was higher than common bacterial infection group(39.4% [13/33] vs 15.0% [3/ 20],P<0.05);the severity score,length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay,and hospitalization expenses in MDRO infection group were all higher than common bacterial infection group(all P<0.05).The mortality of IPN patients were closely associated with MDRO infection and severity score of acute pancreatitis (all P < 0.05).Conclusion Prognosis of patients with MDRO infection is poor,treatment is difficult,MDRO infection has become one of the most important challenge to the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis.

2.
Electron. j. biotechnol ; 14(1): 11-12, Jan. 2011. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-591929

ABSTRACT

A method for counting Infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV) through epifluorescence microscopy was analyzed in detail. Image processing and statistic considerations are included. The particle size of viruses was compared in different experimental conditions such as the staining of the virus with SYBR-Green I or with antibodies for specific fluorescence labeling of viral proteins. The type of surface used as mounting support was assayed as well. The results indicated that the most suitable method involves the mounting of the viral-containing suspension on a membrane filter followed by the staining with a monoclonal antibody specific for a viral protein combined with a FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate)-conjugated secondary antibody.


Subject(s)
Aquabirnavirus , Aquabirnavirus/pathogenicity , Birnaviridae Infections/diagnosis , Birnaviridae Infections/genetics , Birnaviridae Infections , Salmonidae , Fluorescent Antibody Technique/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL