Unilateral interlaminar approach 270° circular spinal canal decompression under the iLESSYS Delta for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly / 中国骨伤

OBJECTIVE@#To investigate the clinical effect of unilateral interlaminar approach 270° circular spinal canal decompression under the Interlaminar Endoscopic Surgical System(iLESSYS) Delta for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in the elderly.@*METHODS@#Total of 29 patients with LSS treated with the iLESSYS Delta from December 2018 to January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed, including 12 males and 17 females with an average age of (71.52±10.82) years old ranging from 63 to 83 years old. All patients had definite intermittent claudication, mainly neurogenic symptoms of both lower limbs. All patients had single-level spinal stenosis, including L3,4 5 cases, L4,5 21 cases, and L5S1 3 cases. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and modified Macnab assessment criteria were used to evaluate pain, low back pain dysfunction index and clinical efficacy, respectively.@*RESULTS@#All 29 cases were successfully completed. The operation time was (73.45±5.89) min, the intraoperative blood loss was (9.93±0.83) ml, the hospital stay was (4.03±0.41) days, and the follow-up was more than 12 months. The VAS scores of low back pain before surgery and 1 day, 1 month, 3 months, 1 year after surgery were 2.31±0.88, 1.45±0.62, 1.21±0.61, 1.10±0.55, 1.03±0.49;VAS of leg pain were 6.48±0.49 0.56, 1.97±0.61, 1.31±0.59, 1.17±0.59, 1.10±0.55;ODI scores were 38.41±2.74, 18.14±1.17, 5.17±0.53, 5.07±0.45, 4.90±0.48;low back and leg pain VAS score and ODI score have statistically significant differences between preoperative and postoperative follow-up time points (P<0.05). The MacNab efficacy evaluation at 1-year follow-up:excellent in 22 cases, good in 5 cases and fair in 2 cases.@*CONCLUSION@#The clinical effect of unilateral interlaminar approach 270° circular spinal canal decompression under the iLESSYS Delta for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly is satisfactory, with the advantages of less trauma and less bleeding, large microscopic operation space, sufficient decompression, and ideal post-operative recovery, and at the same time, it can minimize the damage to the stable structure of the lumbar spine, which is an ideal surgical method for the treatment of elderly lumbar spinal stenosis.

Comparison of clinical efficacy of PEID and PETD in the treatment of L5-S1 lateral recess stenosis / 西安交通大学学报(医学版)

【Objective】 To compare the clinical efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression （PEID） and percutaneous interlaminar endoscopic decompression （PETD） in the treatment of L5-S1 lateral recess stenosis. 【Methods】 We selected the patients in our center diagnosed with L5-S1 lateral recess stenosis from March 2018 to October 2019 and divided them into Group A and Group B according to the principle of prospective， single-blind， and randomized control （A： PETD； B： PEID）. The operation was performed by the same senior surgeon with mature spinal endoscopy technology. We recorded the basic information， operation duration， usage count of C-arm， hospital stay， VAS score and ODI index of lower back and lower limbs before operation and 3 days， 1 month， 1 year and the last follow-up after the operation， and the operative excellent and good rates （the last follow-up）. The angle of bony lateral recess was measured during pre- and postoperative CT. 【Results】 A total of 95 patients （A： n=48； B： n=47） successfully completed the operation and were followed up for at least 1 year. The two groups did not significantly differ in age， gender， hospital stay， or complication by lumbar intervertebral disc herniation， but PEID group had significantly shorter operation duration and fewer usage counts of C-arm （P<0.001）. VAS score of lower back and lower limbs， and ODI index were significantly reduced at 3 days，1 month， 1 year and the last follow-up after the operation， with no significant difference between the two groups at the same time； no statistical difference was found between the two groups in operative excellent and good rates at the last follow-up （P>0.05）. The postoperative bony side recess angle was significantly improved （P<0.05）， while there was no significant difference in either pre- or postoperative bony side recess angle between the two groups （P>0.05）. 【Conclusion】 Both PEID and PETD are effective strategies in the treatment of L5-S1 lateral recess stenosis and can achieve good clinical outcomes.

Risk factors of hidden blood loss during percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy / 西安交通大学学报(医学版)

【Objective】 To explore the relationship between hidden blood loss （HBL） and risk factors in percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy （PEID）. 【Methods】 We retrospectively analyzed 113 patients （67 males and 46 females， aged 21-71 years old） with lumbar disc herniation （L5-S1 level） who underwent PEID with complete clinical data in the Department of Spinal Surgery of Subei People’s Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University from January 2018 to August 2020. The collected data included general patient indicators （age， body mass index and gender）， underlying diseases （hypertension and diabetes）， laboratory tests （prothrombin time， activated partial thromboplastin time， fibrinogen， hematocrit and hemoglobin level）， imaging related parameters （grade of intervertebral disc degeneration， interlaminar space height and soft tissue thickness of interlaminar approach）， intraoperative significant blood loss and operation time. According to the Gross formula， total blood loss and HBL during operation were calculated. And the risk factors of HBL was analyzed. 【Results】 The total perioperative blood loss was （394.85±130.50） mL， and HBL was （337.09±124.98） mL which accounted for 85.4% of the total blood loss. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that operation time （P<0.001） and disc degeneration grade （P=0.020） were independent risk factors of HBL. 【Conclusion】 HBL is the main cause of blood loss during PEID， and operation time and disc degeneration grade are independent risk factors that affect the amount of HBL.

Comparison of the effect of endoscopic discectomy through interlaminar approach for lumbar disc herniation under local or general anesthesia / 西安交通大学学报(医学版)

【Objective】 To investigate the effect or endoscopic discectomy via interlaminar approach in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation under local or general anesthesia. 【Methods】 We selected 78 patients with lumbar disc herniation （L5-S1） who underwent endoscopic discectomy via interlaminar approach from January 2018 to February 2020. According to the anesthesia method， they were divided into local anesthesia group （40 patients） and general anesthesia group （38 patients）. Baseline data， complications， operation time， length of hospital stay， hospitalization expenses， preoperative and postoperative VAS scores were compared between the two groups to evaluate the difference in clinical outcomes. 【Results】 There was no significant difference between the two groups in gender （23/17 vs. 20/18）， age （38.45±13.59 vs 37.39±13.35） years， preoperative VAS score （7.05±1.32 vs. 6.95±1.47）， or other baseline data （P>0.05）. The operation was completed successfully in both groups， and the operation time （83.57±13.24 vs. 86.28±15.43） minutes did not statistically differ （P>0.05）. No complications such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage， nerve injury， or wound infection occurred. In the local anesthesia group， the VAS pain score at 1d， 1 month and 6 months after surgery was 3.05±1.34， 1.90±0.98 and 1.80±1.09， respectively， which were significantly lower than those before surgery （P<0.001）. The VAS pain scores of the general anesthesia group at the above three time points were 3.24±2.01， 2.03±1.20 and 1.59±1.31， respectively， which were also significantly lower than those before surgery （P<0.001）， but the difference was not statistically significant compared with that of the local anesthesia group at the same time point （P>0.05）. However， compared with the general anesthesia group， the length of hospital stay （2.93±0.92） d and the cost of hospitalization （29 397.97±1 398.09） yuan in the local anesthesia group were decreased by 25.8% and 11.7%， respectively， with statistical significance （P<0.05）. 【Conclusion】 Endoscopic discectomy through interlaminar approach under local or general anesthesia can achieve good clinical outcomes in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation （L5-S1）. Compared with general anesthesia， local anesthesia brings a lower overall cost and a shorter hospital stay.

Comparison of single channel-spinal endoscopy (Delta) and unliateral biportal endoscopic technique for the treatment of senile lumbar spinal stenosis / 西安交通大学学报(医学版)

【Objective】 To compare the clinical effect of single channel-spinal endoscopy （Delta） and unliateral biportal endoscopic technique （UBE） for the treatment of senile lumbar spinal stenosis. 【Methods】 We retrospectively analyzed 48 elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated between February and October 2020. The patients were divided into single channel-spinal endoscopy （Delta） group （n=25） and UBE group （n=23） according to different surgical methods. We compared the operation time， intraoperative blood loss， length of hospital stay， and surgical complications between the two groups. The visual analogue score （VAS） and Oswestry disability index （ODI） were compared between the groups. 【Results】 Single channel-spinal endoscopy （Delta） group was significantly inferior to UBE group in operation time （P0.05）. The VAS scores at 24， 48， and 72 postoperative hours did not differ between the two groups （P>0.05）. The ODI scores at 3 postoperative months and final follow-up were significantly improved over the preoperative score in both groups （P0.05）. The incidence rate of complications was 8% （2/25） in single channel-spinal endoscopy （Delta） group and 9% （2/23） in UBE group， and no significant difference was found （P>0.05）. 【Conclusion】 Single channel-spinal endoscopy （Delta） and UBE technique both achieve satisfactory clinical efficacy in the treatment of senile lumbar spinal stenosis. but the former one exhibits advantages over the latter in easier performance and lower learning curve. Single channel-spinal endoscopy （Delta） is an efficacious minimally invasive surgical technique for treating senile lumbar spinal stenosis.

Guía de instrucción en endoscopia de columna avanzado / Instruction guide in advanced endoscopy of the Spine

La evolución de las técnicas quirúrgicas tradicionales y los modelos de formación de los cirujanos exigen cambios, por esta razón el centro de investigación y entrenamiento en cirugía de mínima invasión (CLEMI) ha desarrollado y aplicado modelos de enseñanza que permiten entrenar técnicas quirúrgicas mínimamente invasivas como la endoscopia de columna. CLEMI propone un modelo basado en simulación impartido en un ambiente controlado, estructurado y progresivo que vaya al ritmo individual de cada uno de los participantes. Inicialmente el asistente encontrará conceptos teóricos de instrumental, equipos y la técnica quirúrgica, posteriormente en la fase práctica se aplicarán los conceptos adquiridos usando un modelo sawbone de columna lumbar y finalmente se realizará la practica en un modelo anatómico humano sobre el que se desarrollan de manera completa y guiada los diferentes procedimientos endoscópicos usados a nivel lumbar. El entrenamiento en modelos bajo un ambiente controlado disminuye el período de aprendizaje y eleva la competencia del estudiante.

The evolution of traditional surgical techniques and training models of surgeons require changes. For this reason the centre of research and training in minimally invasive surgery (CLEMI) has developed and applied teaching models that help in the training of minimally invasive surgical techniques such as the endoscopy of the spine. CLEMI proposes a model based on simulation taught in a controlled, structured, and progressive environment that is adjusted to the individual rhythm of each of the participants. The student will initially encounter the theoretical concepts of instruments, equipment, and the surgical technique. This will be followed by a practical phase in which the acquired concepts will be applied using a sawbone model of the lumbar spine. Finally the practice will be carried out on a human anatomical model on which they develop, in a complete and guided manner, the different endoscopic procedures used at the lumbar level. Model training in a controlled environment decreases the learning period and increases student skills.

Clinical Results of Interlaminar Approach for Endoscopic Discectomy in the Herniated Lumbar Disc at L5-S1

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study of 57 patients was performed to evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic surgery by using interlaminar approach (ILA) in symptomatic lumbar disc herniation (LDH) at L5-S1. METHODS: Visual analogue pain score (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were used to assess the clinical outcome. All assessment was done on 1 day before the operation, 3 days, 3months and 12months after the operation. RESULTS: The mean preoperative back and leg VAS was decreased from 5.6+/-1.4, 8.5+/-1.7 to 1.8+/-1.2, 1.5+/-1.3 at 3 days, 1.2+/-1.1, 1.8+/-1.7 at 3 months, and 1.4+/-1.7, 1.6+/-1.3 at 12 months after the operation. Mean preoperative ODI score was improved from 46.8+/-22.4% to 17.7+/-11.6% at 3 days, 15.3+/-10.1% at 3 months, and 16.2+/-9.3% at 12 months after the operation. There were 2 cases of surgical failure due to dural tearing and calcified disc. One patient presented with transient paresthesia postoperatively. Two patients showed the recurrent disc herniation at the same level and same side, and underwent second open surgery. CONCLUSION: The present study revealed that percutaneous endoscopic surgery by using ILA is an effective surgical modality for the selective cases of LDH at L5-S1.

Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PELD) Using Interlaminar Approach in Lumbar Disc Herniation: Endoscopic Laminotomy / 대한척추외과학회지

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study OBJECTIVES: This study examined the post-operative results of interlaminar percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) with or without endoscopic laminotomy in lumbar disc herniation. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: In addition to the technical feasibility, the indications of PELD surgery are usually the same as those for open discectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2005 to August 2006, 62 cases treated with PELD using an interlaminar approach due to lumbar disc herniation were examined. The mean age of the subjects was 40.1 years (18-70) and the mean follow up period was 32.6 months (24-44). Thirty-four and 28 herniated discs were extracted from L4-L5 and L5-S1, respectively. The clinical results were evaluated using MacNab's criteria. RESULTS: The herniated discs were accessible in all cases. Excellent and good results were obtained in 85% (53 cases) of patients but 15% of patients (9 cases) showed unsatisfactory results or needed revision. There were 4 cases of incomplete removal, 2 cases of recurrence and 4 cases of persistent low back pain due to associated degenerative pathologies. Additional surgery was required in 7 cases which were open discectomy in 5 cases (3 cases of 4 incomplete removal and 2 of recurrence). There was one case of PLIF and 1 additional decompression. Cauda equina syndrome occurred in one case who underwent subsequent wide decompression and open discectomy. CONCLUSIONS: interlaminar PELD using endoscopic laminotomy is an effective method for treating lumbar disc herniation with moderate up and down migration. The clinical success rate can be improved by selecting patients with accessible discs and excluding those with an associated pathology.

Factors Affecting Learning Curve in Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy using Interlaminar Approach / 대한척추외과학회지

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study OBJECTIVES: To try and find the best surgical technique by analyzing the real-time video taken during a percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: A percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy, using an interlaminar approach, has superior aspects, such as anatomical similarity with that of open spinal surgery, and applicability regardless of the herniated level. However, the technical difficulty can be an obstacle to shortening of the learning-curve. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2005 and January 2006, 56 patients who were underwent an operation at our hospital, due to single level (L4-5 or L5-S1) herniated lumbar disc disease, by one surgeon, and were selected for this study. The procedure was divided by the approach; either ligament flavum resection, partial removal of the lamina or root identification and discectomy. By analyzing the real-time video taken during the operation, as well as checking the time taken for each procedure, the factors influencing the prolongation of surgery time can be sought, and efforts made to shorten the operation time. RESULTS: The mean operation time was 65 minutes (28 minutes~127 minutes). The mean operation times in patients either requiring or not requiring partial removal of the lamina were 84 minutes (45 minutes~127 minutes) and 45 minutes (28 minutes~91 minutes), respectively, and also showed a statistically significant correlation (p=0.023). The mean operation times for the first and last 10 cases were 107 and 48 minutes, respectively. 3 cases needed revision open surgery due to failed symptom resolution. The procedures affecting a prolonged operation time were partial removal the lamina and ligament flavum resection. The time required for ligament flavum resection plateaued after 20 cases, and that for partial removal of the lamina reached plateau after 19 cases. CONCLUSIONS: By overcoming such technical problems, shortening of the learning-curve for a percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy was possible.

Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy for L5-S1 Disc Herniation: Axillary Approach and Preliminary Results

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe a surgical technique of axillary approach of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for L5-S1 disc herniation and its preliminary results. METHODS: From July 2002 to September 2003, 101 patients with lumbar radiculopathy due to L5-S1 disc herniation, who were treated by percutaneous interlaminar endoscopic discectomy, were retrospectively reviewed. There were 57 males and 44 females with a mean age of 44.8 years (range, 18 to 62 years). The surgery consisted of needle insertion into the epidural space via the interlaminar space, sequential dilatation, and endoscopic discectomy through the axillary area of the S1 root. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 14.5 months and the average surgical time was 41 min. According to the modified Macnab criteria, 44 patients (43.6%) had excellent outcomes, 49 (48.5%) had good results and only 8 (7.8%) had fair or poor outcomes. Four patients had a revision microdiscectomy due to incomplete removal of disc fragment. There were no major complications related to this surgical approach. CONCLUSION: Axillary approach of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy is safe and effective procedure for the treatment of L5-S1 disc herniation. It combines the advantages of MED and conventional percutaneous endoscopic discectomy.

Far Lateral Extraforaminal Disc Herniation after Percutaneous Laser Lumbar Discectomy

The authors report a case of far lateral disc herniation at L4-5 found one year after percutaneous laser lumbar discectomy. The patient was found to be suffering from new-onset right lumbar radiculopathy 6 months after his first operation, and post operative lumbar MRI confirmed a far lateral extraforaminal disc herniation at L4-5, with compression of the nerve. This corresponded to the nucleotomy site of the probe. The patient underwent surgery employng the combined paraspinal intertransverse and interlaminar approach, and his symptoms were relieved. This case emphasizes the importance of removing nuclear material, and shows that remaining material can herniate through a percutaneous discectomy window.