ABSTRACT
Resumo: Trata-se de um estudo metodológico para construção e validação de um cenário simulado com abordagem interprofissional, que permitirá a utilização no ensino e na educação permanente de profissionais da saúde por meio da metodologia ativa de simulação clínica. Este estudo foi realizado em uma universidade pública da região Sul do Brasil, objetivando construir e validar um cenário simulado para a pronação de pacientes críticos com Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório Agudo (SDRA). Para isto, o estudo ocorreu em duas etapas: revisão de conteúdo, construção do cenário e de validação de conteúdo e de aparência por juízes. A revisão da literatura permitiu conhecer melhor sobre o manejo do paciente com SDRA, bem como subsidiar o desenvolvimento do caso clínico para o cenário. Um protocolo de pronação segura de um hospital universitário foi adotado. A partir desta revisão, a construção do cenário foi realizada considerando um roteiro validado. Como parte desta construção, surgiram como resultados: a descrição do cenário; a relação de materiais e equipamentos necessários para o desenvolvimento do cenário; o roteiro para o ator simulado; o guia de apoio ao facilitador; o guia de apoio ao participante; o quadro de apoio para tomada de decisão e o checklist de observação do desenvolvimento de competências e habilidades para cada profissão envolvida no cenário. Onze juízes participaram do estudo. Em relação ao perfil sociodemográfico dos juízes, a amostra foi predominantemente de enfermeiros (63,6%), seguido por fisioterapeutas (18,1%), médico (9%) e docente de enfermagem (9%). Para medir o percentual de concordância entre os juízes, adotou-se o Índice de Validade de Conteúdo (IVC) para os itens, que foram agrupados de acordo com unidades de significância. Após a leitura do cenário, os juízes responderam a um questionário do tipo Likert com 37 itens, que abordaram sobre a "Experiência Prévia do Participante/Briefing", "Conteúdo/Objetivos"; "Recursos Humanos"; "Preparo do Cenário", "Desenvolvimento do Cenário" e "Avaliação". Todos os itens obtiveram IVC superior ao desejável (0,80) e, portanto, foram considerados válidos. Além disso, os juízes realizaram sugestões de melhorias no cenário, aos quais foram acatadas ou rejeitas e discutidas com a literatura disponível. Este estudo permitiu criar e validar um cenário que reflete a prática real, ao mesmo tempo que oportuniza um ambiente seguro para os participantes e responde aos objetivos da aprendizagem.
Abstract: This is a methodological study for the construction and validation of a simulated scenario with an interprofessional approach, which will allow the use in the teaching and continuing education of health professionals through the active methodology of clinical simulation. This study was carried out in a public university in the South region of Brazil, aiming to build and validate a simulated scenario for the pronation of critically ill patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). To this end, the study occurred in two stages: content review, scenario construction, and content and appearance validation by judges. The literature review provided a better understanding of the management of the ARDS patient, as well as a basis for developing the clinical case for the scenario. A safe pronation protocol from a university hospital was adopted. Based on this review, the scenario was built using a validated script. As part of this process, the following results emerged: the description of the scenario; the list of materials and equipment needed for the development of the scenario; the script for the simulated actor; the facilitator support guide; the participant support guide; the decision support framework; and the checklist for observing the development of competencies and skills for each profession involved in the scenario. Eleven judges participated in the study. Regarding the sociodemographic profile of the judges, the sample was predominantly nurses (63.6%), followed by physical therapists (18.1%), physicians (9%), and nursing professors (9%). To measure the percentage of agreement between the judges, the Content Validity Index (CVI) was adopted for the items, which were grouped according to significance units. After reading the scenario, the judges answered a Likert-type questionnaire with 37 items, which addressed "Prior Participant Experience/Briefing", "Content/Objectives"; "Human Resources"; "Scenario Preparation", "Scenario Development", and "Evaluation". All items scored higher than desirable CVI (0.80) and were therefore considered valid. In addition, the judges made suggestions for improvements in the scenario, which were accepted or rejected and discussed with the available literature. This study made it possible to create and validate a scenario that reflects actual practice, while providing a safe environment for participants and meeting the learning objectives.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn , Patient Simulation , Interprofessional Education , COVID-19 , LearningABSTRACT
The purpose of this study is to address what undergraduate students of professional healthcare learned in interprofessional education (IPE), and to explore a way to develop interprofessional work (IPW) competencies effectively in IPE. A qualitative analysis was conducted on the portfolios of 9 medical, 8 dental, 16 pharmaceutical, and 16 nursing and rehabilitation students. 6 elements were identified in the undergraduate IPE; 【Patient/Family-Centered care】, 【Value/Ethics for IPW】, 【Communication Necessary for IPW】, 【Roles/Responsibilities as Healthcare Professionals】, 【Understanding of their own profession】, 【Team/Team work】. In order to acquire these capabilities, undergraduate education programs based on IPE are required.
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study is to address what undergraduate students of professional healthcare learned in interprofessional education (IPE), and to explore a way to develop interprofessional work (IPW) competencies effectively in IPE. A qualitative analysis was conducted on the portfolios of 9 medical, 8 dental, 16 pharmaceutical, and 16 nursing and rehabilitation students. 6 elements were identified in the undergraduate IPE; 【Patient/Family-Centered care】, 【Value/Ethics for IPW】, 【Communication Necessary for IPW】, 【Roles/Responsibilities as Healthcare Professionals】, 【Understanding of their own profession】, 【Team/Team work】. In order to acquire these capabilities, undergraduate education programs based on IPE are required.
ABSTRACT
Resumo Este artigo tem como objetivo identificar as dimensões do trabalho interprofissional e das práticas colaborativas desenvolvidas por uma equipe de saúde da família em uma unidade básica de saúde. Trata-se de pesquisa qualitativa realizada mediante observação participante do trabalho desenvolvido por profissionais de saúde. O estudo realizado evidenciou avanços na incorporação de práticas colaborativas no âmbito da atenção primária e na criação de espaços mais favoráveis ao diálogo e ao estabelecimento de consensos que resultam em cuidado integral e segurança do paciente, a despeito dos conflitos e das tensões próprias do processo de trabalho em saúde.(AU)
Resumen El objetivo de este artículo es identificar las dimensiones del trabajo interprofesional y de las prácticas colaborativas desarrolladas por un equipo de salud de la familia en una unidad básica de salud. Se trata de investigación cualitativa realizada mediante observación participativa del trabajo desarrollado por profesionales de la salud. El estudio realizado mostró avances en la incorporación de prácticas colaborativas en el ámbito de la atención primaria y en la creación de espacios más favorables al diálogo y al establecimiento de consensos que resultan en cuidado integral y seguridad del paciente, a pesar de los conflictos y de las tensiones propias del proceso del trabajo en salud.(AU)
Abstract This article aims at identifying the dimensions of interprofessional work and of collaborative practices developed by a family health team at a primary care unit. This qualitative research was conducted through participant observation of the work developed by health professionals. The study evidenced advances in the incorporation of collaborative practices in primary healthcare and in the creation of spaces that favor dialogs and the establishment of a consensus that result in comprehensive care and patient safety, despite conflicts and tensions inherent to the health work process.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Health Centers , Family Health , Qualitative Research , Interprofessional RelationsABSTRACT
Healthcare professionals need to understand the operational mechanisms that drive the team-care model. Although such concepts should be integrated into the education of healthcare students, but current methods of teaching such a model of care are unsatisfactory. In 2007 the Faculty of Medicine and Health Science of Kobe University introduced an early clinical exposure program focusing on team care for first-year students. In 2008, students of the school of pharmacy joined this program. We have developed a collaborative program, the Interprofessional Work tutorial program, for the fourth year of the undergraduate curriculum. As the history of collaborative education for healthcare students is relatively short, we faculty members continuously discuss how to develop this tutorial program. Simulated multidisciplinary team conferences have been introduced into this program to increase students’ understanding of the scenario. During the course of this program, students, as well as faculty members, come to understand the roles of other professionals and to consider collaboration to be fundamental for patient-centered treatment and care. Interprofessional education is essential for human resource development and for preparing future healthcare professionals to participate in interdisciplinary team care. We must integrate the community-based aspects of health and welfare into interprofessional education for health professional students.