Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-194297

ABSTRACT

Background: Bupivacaine when used alone produces analgesia for 2.5 to 3 hours, making it unsuitable in cases where the duration of surgery is longer and in cases which require further analgesia during post-operative period. Present study is intended to evaluate the effect of addition of intrathecal midazolam to bupivacaine to prolong the post-operative analgesia.Methods: Present clinical study was conducted in Kamineni Institute of Medical Sciences, Narketpally, Nalgonda District, Andhra Pradesh, India. After obtaining approval from institutional ethical committee, present clinical study was undertaken to evaluate the effects of addition of intrathecal midazolam to bupivacaine 0.5% (heavy). The study was conducted on 60 patients undergoing lower abdominal surgeries.Results: Mean onset of analgesia was 190.5 with SD 21.3 in group-C whereas in group-M, mean onset of analgesia was 185.3 with SD 26.81. Mean difference between the groups not showing statistical significance. In the present study the Maximum height of sensory blockade in control and midazolam group was T7 (T6-T8) compared to T7 (T6-T8) midazolam group. Mean duration of sensory blockade was 130.4 with SD 36.36 in group-C whereas in group-M, mean duration of sensory blockade was 191.9 with SD 36.4. Mean difference between the groups showing statistical significance. Mean duration of motor blockade was 176.3 with SD 23.7 in group-C whereas in group-M, mean duration of motor blockade was 208.1 with SD 18.21. Mean difference between the groups showing statistical significance.Conclusions: Midazolam is a useful adjuvant to bupivacaine in subarachnoid block. Intrathecal midazolam combined with intrathecal bupivacaine produces a longer and more effective anaesthesia and analgesia. It also prolongs post-operative analgesia without increasing adverse effects.

2.
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology ; : 204-209, 2014.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-61146

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anesthesia today has strived to decrease labor pain in a tolerable and controllable fashion. Intrathecal midazolam has been introduced as an adjunct to analgesics. The study was planned to assess the efficacy, safety and duration of analgesia produced by intrathecal midazolam adjunct to sufentanil in decreasing labor pain. METHODS: In a randomized clinical trial 80 parturient included in the study. The two groups were matched for age, cervical dilation, gravid, gestational age, and other demographic characteristics. Combination of sufentanil and midazolam administered intrathecally to experimental group and compared to sufentanil group. Time to reach maximum block, and pain score was measured and recorded. RESULTS: Groups were matched for age and weight and other demographic characteristic. No significant adverse effect was seen in both groups including decrease in Apgar score. Duration of analgesia was 92.0 +/- 12.7 in sufentanil group and 185.2 +/- 15.2 minutes in midazolam and sufentanil group which was significantly different (P = 0.002). Numeric rating scale score was significantly lower in midazolam group compare to sufentanil group at 120 min (P = 0.01), 150 min (P = 0.0014), and 180 min (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal midazolam as an adjunct to opioid could significantly enhance analgesia in labor pain with no significant adverse effect. Intrathecal injection of midazolam is an appropriate alternative to parenteral or epidural analgesia in small hospital settings.


Subject(s)
Female , Pregnancy , Analgesia , Analgesia, Epidural , Analgesics , Anesthesia , Apgar Score , Gestational Age , Injections, Spinal , Labor Pain , Midazolam , Sufentanil
3.
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology ; : S22-S28, 2007.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-209758

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although the intrathecal (IT) administration of midazolam has been reported to have analgesic effect in humans, it is not clear whether IT midazolam can prolong the duration of sensory block to T10 dermatome that is required block level for lower extremity surgery. The effect of 1 or 2 mg of IT midazolam added to bupivacaine on the duration of spinal anesthesia to T10 were examined in orthopedic patients. METHODS: Sixty six adult patients were randomly allocated to receive 11 mg of intrathecal 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine alone (Group B, n = 22) or with 1 mg (Group BM-1, n = 22) or 2 mg (Group BM-2, n = 22) of midazolam. Both the patients and the observers were blinded to the drug solutions and patient groups. The onset and duration of sensory block to T10, BIS, OAA/S scale, hemodynamic variables, and side effects during the operation and recovery were compared among the groups. RESULTS: The onset of sensory and motor block were not different among the groups. However, the duration of sensory block to T10 in the Group BM-2 was prolonged more 52.2, 42.2 minutes than the Group B and the Group BM-1, respectively. The BIS scale of the Group BM-2 tended to be lower than the Group B and the Group BM-1 but there were no statistical significance. The OAA/S scale were significantly higher in the Group BM-2 than the Group B and the Group BM-1 during operation. There were no differences in hemodynamic variables and side effects among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal addition of midazolam 2 mg to bupivacaine prolonged the duration of spinal block to T10 in orthopedic patients.


Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Anesthesia, Spinal , Bupivacaine , Hemodynamics , Lower Extremity , Midazolam , Orthopedics
4.
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology ; : 490-495, 2005.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-30525

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There have been recent reports on the effects of the addition of intrathecal midazolam to bupivacaine on spinal anesthesia. Therefore, the effects of the addition of intrathecal midazolam to bupivacaine on spinal anesthesia and peri-operative sedation were investigated. METHODS: Thirty one ASA class 1 and 2 patients, scheduled for transurethral resection of the bladder or prostate (TURB or TURP), were randomly divided into two groups. Group B (n = 15) received bupivacaine 12 mg, and normal saline 0.6 ml, whereas group BM (n = 16) received bupivacaine 12 mg, midazolam 2 mg, and normal saline 0.2 ml. The blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), bispectral index (BIS) and Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (OAA/S scale) scores were recorded every 5 minutes, both before and during the spinal anesthesia. The sensory blockade was measured using a pin-prick test, and motor blockade evaluated using the Bromage motor scale. In addition, the side effects, including pruritus, nausea, vomiting, and headache, and so on, were observed for a period of 24 hours. RESULTS: There were no differences in the motor and sensory block and recovery between the two groups. However, a difference was found in the time to first recognition of pain and the BIS scores between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal midazolam did not, itself, affect the spinal anesthesia, but was found to have a statistically prolonged postoperative analgesic and more sedative effects.


Subject(s)
Humans , Anesthesia, Spinal , Blood Pressure , Bupivacaine , Headache , Heart Rate , Hypnotics and Sedatives , Midazolam , Nausea , Oxygen , Prostate , Pruritus , Urinary Bladder , Vomiting
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL