Second-generation laryngeal mask airway as an alternative to endotracheal tube in prolonged laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a comparative analysis of intraoperative gas exchanges

INTRODUCTION@#Laryngeal mask airway (LMA), which is used in difficult airway maintenance conditions during emergencies, is rarely used in prolonged surgery despite its advantages over endotracheal tube (ETT). In this study, we conducted a comparative analysis of intraoperative gas exchanges between second-generation LMA and ETT during prolonged laparoscopic abdominal surgery.@*METHODS@#Prolonged surgery was defined as a surgery lasting more than 2 h. In total, 394 patients who underwent laparoscopic liver resection via either second-generation LMA or ETT were retrospectively analysed. The following parameters were compared between the two groups of patients: end-tidal pressure of carbon dioxide (ETCO2), tidal volume (TV), respiratory rate (RR), peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), pH and ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen to fractional inspired oxygen (PFR) during surgery. In addition, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), including pulmonary aspiration, was compared.@*RESULTS@#The values of ETCO2, TV, RR and PIP during pneumoperitoneum were comparable between the two groups. Although PaCO2 at 2 h after induction was higher in patients in the LMA group (40.5 vs. 38.5 mmHg, P < 0.001), the pH and PFR values of the two groups were comparable. The incidence of PPC was similar.@*CONCLUSION@#During prolonged laparoscopic abdominal surgery, second-generation LMA facilitates adequate intraoperative gas exchange and may serve as an alternative to ETT.

Abordaje laparoscópico simultáneo del cáncer de colon con metástasis hepáticas / Simultaneous laparoscopic approach for colon cancer and liver metastases

Antecedentes: la hemicolectomía derecha laparoscópica con abordaje suprapúbico (HDLS) y empleo de tecnología. En los pacientes con cáncer de colon con metástasis hepáticas sincrónicas (CCMHS), la resección completa del tumor primario con las metástasis es la única opción de tratamiento con intención curativa. Se conocen varios informes de series de casos en el mundo; sin embargo, no existe ningún estudio aleatorizado controlado. Objetivo: el objetivo es evaluar la factibilidad y seguridad del abordaje laparoscópico simultáneo de la resección del tumor primario de colon y de la metástasis hepática. Material y métodos: es un estudio retrospectivo; a tal fin se recolectaron todos los pacientes con sospecha de CCMHS abordados por laparoscopia con intención de resección simultánea del tumor primario de colon con las metástasis hepáticas. Se analizaron variables preoperatorias, operatorias, resultados a corto y largo plazo, y anatomopatológicas. Resultados: en el período de estudio se realizaron 89 resecciones hepáticas laparoscópicas (RHL). En 28 pacientes se realizó ‒en forma simultánea con la RHL‒ otro procedimiento, en 21 de los cuales fue una colectomía laparoscópica. El tiempo quirúrgico promedio total de los dos procedimientos llegó a 407 minutos. El promedio de días de estadía hospitalaria fue de 8 días. No hubo mortalidad en la serie, y la morbilidad global fue del 71%, pero un solo caso con morbilidad mayor. La sobrevida global y la sobrevida libre de recurrencia a los 3 años fue de 55,2% y 16,3%, respectivamente. Conclusión: Esta es la primera publicación acerca del tema en nuestro país. Podemos decir que, en casos bien seleccionados, el abordaje laparoscópico simultáneo es factible de realizar, con aceptable morbimortalidad y sin comprometer los resultados oncológicos.

Background: In patients with colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases (CLM), complete resection of the primary tumor with the metastases is the only option for curative treatment. Several case series have been reported but no randomized controlled trials have been published. Objective: The aim was to evaluate if the simultaneous laparoscopic resection of the primary colon tumor and liver metastases is feasible and safe. Material and methods: A retrospective study was conducted with patients with suspected CLM scheduled for simultaneous laparoscopic resection of the primary tumor of the colon and liver metastases. The preoperative and operative variables, short- and long-term outcomes and pathological variables were analyzed. Results: A total of 89 laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) were performed during the study period. In 28 patients, LLR was simultaneous with other procedures, 21 of which corresponded to laparoscopic colon resection. Mean surgical time for both procedures was 407 minutes. Mean hospital length of stay was 8 days. None of the patients died and overall morbidity rate was 71% with only one major complication. Overall survival and relapse-free survival at three years was 55.2% and 16.3%, respectively. Conclusion: This is the first publication analyzing this approach in our country. In well selected cases, the simultaneous laparoscopic approach is feasible, with low morbidity and mortality and acceptable oncological results.

Clinical analysis on safety and efficacy of ICG real-time fluorescence imaging in laparoscopic hepatectomy of HCC at special location / 解放军医学杂志

Objective To analyze the safety and efficacy of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence real-time imaging technology and digital ultrasound guidance technology for laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) of HCC at special location. Methods Twenty-four patients with hepatocellular carcinoma at special location were enrolled and equally divided into two groups: ICG fluorescent group received intravenous indocyanine green injection 2-3 days before operation, and then did fluorescent laparoscopic liver resection, while the normal control group were given general laparoscopic liver resection; meanwhile, the intraoperative and postoperative indexes including operative time, intraoperative bleeding, complications and length of hospital stay were analyzed to judge the clinical feasibility. Results Except 1 case treated with laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation because of the old age and illness factors and 1 case for conversion to laparotomy, all the rest were treated by LLR with ICG real-time images combined guidance of ultrasound in ICG fluorescent group, and all the patients but one who underwent conversion to laparotomy received general laparoscopic resection in the normal control group. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of operative time [(215.0±35.8)min vs. (208.0±18.6)min, P=0.554]. As compared with the normal control group, the intraoperative bleeding volume significantly reduced [(255.0±19.4)ml vs. (230.0±17.5)ml, P=0.0032], and the hospital stay significantly shortened [(8.9±1.2)d vs. (10.6±1.6)d, P=0.0076], but there was no statistical differences between the two groups in R0 cutting edge and complications (P=0.308; P=0.173). Conclusion Laparoscopic liver resection using ICG fluorescence real-time imaging combined the digital imaging technology under ultrasound guidance is a safe and effective treatment approach for HCC at the special position, being worthy of further promotion clinically.

Current status and prospect of surgical treatment of liver cancer / 中华外科杂志

With the rapid development of liver surgery,minimally invasive techniques have been widely used in liver surgery. Many challenging liver can be performed laparoscopically to decrease the surgical trauma. At the same time,the efficiency and accuracy of liver surgeries have been highly improved by the advanced assisted technology of liver surgery. The purpose of this article is to summarize the current situation of liver surgery as well as the future of liver surgery.

Short-term and long-term efficacy of laparoscopic versus open liver resection in the treatment of hepatocel-lular carcinoma / 实用医学杂志

Objective To explore the short-term and long-term efficacy of laparoscopic versus open liver resection(LLR)in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC). Methods The perioperative and follow-up data ofLLR(n = 43)and OLR(n = 73)for the treatment of HCC at the same period were analyzed respectively. Results There were no significant differences in the age,gender,Child-Pugh classification,liver cirrhosis, AFP,and hepatic virus affection between the 2 groups. 1 case in the LLR group was converted for the open surgery and another one case in the OLR group died in the perioperative time. However ,compared with OLR group ,the intraoperative blood loss of LLR group(P 0.05). The first and third year disease-free survival rates were 82.2%,53.8%for LLR and 91.5%,75.9%for OLR,respectively(χ2=0.55,P=0.46). The first and third 5 year overall survival rates were 94.2%,79.3%for LLR and 94.9%,47.3%for OLR,respectively(χ2=1.06, P=0.30). Conclusion LLR for HCC treatment is a safe and effective way with the advantages of minimal opera-tive trauma,quick recovery and significant short-term efficacy.

Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for elderly patients with malignant liver tumors / 上海预防医学

Objective To compare the curative effect and short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection with open liver resection in elderly patients with malignant liver tumors and medical comorbidities.Methods Patients aged 70 and over who received liver resections for malignant liver tumors between January and October 2015 were enrolled.The perioperative outcomes of 17 patients with laparoscopic approach were matched and compared with those of 34 patients with conventional open approach in a 1:2 ratio.Results There was no significant difference found between the two groups with regard to age,gender,incidence of comorbid illness,hepatitis B positivity,and Child-Pugh grading of liver function.The median tumor size was 3 cm for both groups.The types of liver resection were similar between the two groups with no significant difference in the duration of operation (laparoscopic: 195 min vs.open: 210 min,P=0.436).The perioperative blood loss was 150 mL in the laparoscopic group and 330 mL in the open group (P=0.046) with no significant difference in the number of patients with blood transfusion.The duration of hospital stay was 6 days (3-15 days) for the laparoscopic group and 8 days (5-105 days) for the open group (P=0.005).Conclusion Laparoscopic liver resection is safe and feasible for elderly patients.The short-term benefits of laparoscopic approach proves to be evident for geriatric oncological liver surgery.

Evolution of laparoscopic liver resection at Singapore General Hospital: a nine-year experience of 195 consecutive resections

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>We aimed to analyse the changing trends, safety and outcomes associated with the adoption of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) at a single centre.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A retrospective review of patients who underwent LLR from 2006 to 2014 at our institution was performed. To explore the evolution of LLR, the study was divided into three equal consecutive time periods (Period 1: 2006-2008, Period 2: 2009-2011, and Period 3: 2012-2014).</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Among 195 patients who underwent LLR, 24 (12.3%) required open conversions, 68 (34.9%) had resection of tumours in the difficult posterosuperior segments and 12 (6.2%) underwent major (≥ 3 segments) hepatectomies. Median operation time was 210 (range 40-620) minutes and median postoperative stay was 4 (range 1-26) days. Major postoperative morbidity (> Grade II) occurred in 11 (5.6%) patients and 90-day/in-hospital mortality was 1 (0.5%). During the study, the number of LLRs performed showed an increasing trend (Period 1: n = 22; Period 2: n = 19; Period 3: n = 154). Other statistically significant trends were: (a) increase in malignant neoplasms resected; (b) increase in resections of difficult posterosuperior segments; (c) longer median operation time; and (d) decrease in open conversion rates.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Over the study period, the number of LLRs increased rapidly. LLR was increasingly performed for malignant neoplasms and lesions located in the difficult posterosuperior segments, resulting in longer operation times. However, open conversion rates decreased, and there was no change in postoperative morbidity and other perioperative outcomes.</p>

Current Status of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Experiences from Tertiary Center

Laparoscopic liver resection has been widely accepted nowadays for selective cases of liver diseases. Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy and minor LLR are considered standard practice worldwide and cautious introduction of major laparoscopic liver resections like hemihepatectomies, central sectionectomy etc.. in institutions having experienced liver surgeons. Because of increasing young liver donor, laparoscopic donor hepatectomy is becoming popular, which gives better cosmetic outcomes. Many clinical trials compared laparoscopic liver resection safety, long term outcomes with open procedures. More recently, advances in laparoscopic instruments and techniques encouraged Korean surgeons to choose a laparoscopic procedure as one of the treatment options for benign or malignant diseases of liver.

Robotic hepatectomy: initial experience of a single institution in Singapore

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>In this study, we report our initial experience with robotic hepatectomy.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Consecutive patients who underwent robotic hepatectomy at Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, from February 2013 to February 2015 were enrolled in this study. The difficulty level of operations was graded using a novel scoring system for laparoscopic hepatectomies.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>During the two-year period, five consecutive robotic hepatectomies were performed (one left lateral sectionectomy, one non-anatomical segment II/III resection, one anatomical segment V resection with cholecystectomy, one extended right posterior sectionectomy and one non-anatomical segment V/VI resection). Two hepatectomies were performed for suspected hepatocellular carcinoma, two for solitary liver metastases and one for a large symptomatic haemangioma. The median age of the patients was 53 (range 38-66) years and the median tumour size was 2.5 (range 2.1-7.3) cm. The median total operation time was 340 (range 155-825) minutes and the median volume of blood loss was 300 (range 50-1,200) mL. There were no open conversions and no mortalities or major morbidities (> Clavien-Dindo Grade II). The difficulty level of the operations was graded as low in one case (Score 2), intermediate in three cases (Score 5, 6 and 6) and high in one case (Score 10). There was one minor morbidity, where the patient experienced Grade A bile leakage, which resolved spontaneously. The median length of postoperative hospital stay was 5 (range 4-7) days.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Our initial experience confirmed the feasibility and safety of robotic hepatectomy.</p>

Feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection for giant hemangioma of greater than 6 cm in diameter

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Liver hemangioma, the most common benign liver tumor, can be safely managed by clinical observation. However, surgical treatment should be considered in a subset of patients with giant hemangioma with abdominal symptoms. We reviewed the feasibility of total laparoscopic liver resection for giant hemangioma of >6 cm in diameter. METHODS: Nine consecutive patients who underwent total laparoscopic liver resection for giant hemangioma between August 2008 to December 2012 were included in this study. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for demographic data, laboratory findings, and perioperative results. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 36 yrs (range, 31-63). Eight females and 1 male were included in the study. The median size of hemangioma was 11 cm in diameter (range, 6-18) and 5 patients had a hemangioma >10 cm. Indications for surgical treatments were abdominal symptoms in 4 patients, increased size in 5 patients, and uncertain diagnosis in 1 patient. The median operation time was 522 minutes for right hepatectomy, 220 minutes for left lateral sectionectomy, and 90 minutes for wedge resection. The median estimated blood loss was 400 ml (range, 50-900). There was no postoperative morbidity, including Clanvien-Dindo grade I. CONCLUSIONS: The resection of giant hemangioma demands meticulous surgical technique due to high vascularity and the concomitant risk of intraoperative hemorrhage. Laparoscopic liver resection is feasible with minimal operative complication. Therefore, laparoscopic liver resection can be considered as an option for surgical treatment for giant hemangioma.

Laparoscopic Habib 4X bipolar radiofrequency device in laparoscopic liver resection / 中华肝胆外科杂志

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic Habib 4X (Habib 4X,Angio Dynamics US),a new bipolar radiofrequency (RF) device,in laparoscopic liver resection.Methods Thirty one patients who underwent laparoscopic liver resection using the laparoscopic Habib 4X from Sept 2009 to Apr 2012 were studied retrospectively.Results The laparoscopic Habib 4X was success fully used in 30 patients (malignant,n=18; benign,n=12).The procedures performed included left lateral sectionectomy (n=12),left hemi-hepatectomy (n=1),Ⅴ or Ⅵ segmentectomy (n=9),Ⅴ and Ⅵ bi-segmentectomy (n=2) and wedge exclusion (n=6).The time required for precoagulation and resection was 10～68 min (median 24 min).The mean intraoperative blood loss was 145±75ml (range 8-370 ml).Mild abnormal liver function which returned to normal in 3 to 5 days was detected postoperatively.The mean hospital stay was 7.8±2.6 d (range 3～12 days).There was no patient who developed postoperative bleeding,bile leakage or abdominal abscess.For cancer patients,there was no local recurrence on follow-up.Conclusion Laparoscopic Habib 4X,a device when used in laparoscopic liver resection,resulted in minimal blood loss and quick recovery.It had only mild effect on liver function and it had low morbidity.In addition,it might reduce the risk of local recurrence in malignant tumours.

Current Status of Laparoscopic Liver Resection in Korea

Since laparoscopic liver resection was first introduced in 2001, Korean surgeons have chosen a laparoscopic procedure as one of the treatment options for benign or malignant liver disease. We distributed and analyzed a nationwide questionnaire to members of the Korean Laparoscopic Liver Surgery Study Group (KLLSG) in order to evaluate the current status of laparoscopic liver resection in Korea. Questionnaires were sent to 24 centers of KLLSG. The questionnaire consisted of operative procedure, histological diagnosis of liver lesions, indications for resection, causes of conversion to open surgery, and postoperative outcomes. A laparoscopic liver resection was performed in 416 patients from 2001 to 2008. Of 416 patients, 59.6% had malignant tumors, and 40.4% had benign diseases. A total laparoscopic approach was performed in 88.7%. Anatomical laparoscopic liver resection was more commonly performed than non-anatomical resection (59.9% vs 40.1%). The anatomical laparoscopic liver resection procedures consisted of a left lateral sectionectomy (29.3%), left hemihepatectomy (19.2%), right hemihepatectomy (6%), right posterior sectionectomy (4.3%), central bisectionectomy (0.5%), and caudate lobectomy (0.5%). Laparoscopy-related serious complications occurred in 12 (2.8%) patients. The present study findings provide data in terms of indication, type and method of liver resection, and current status of laparoscopic liver resection in Korea.

Lessons learned from 100 initial cases of laparoscopic liver surgery / 대한외과학회지

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is now widely accepted and is being increasingly performed. The present study describes our experience with LLR at a single center over an eight-year period. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 100 patients between October 2002 and February 2010. Forty-six benign lesions and 54 malignant lesions were included. The LLR performed included 58 pure laparoscopy procedures, 18 hand-assisted laparoscopy procedures and 24 hybrid technique procedures. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 57 years; among these patients, 31 were over 65 years of age. The mean operation time was 220 minutes. The overall morbidity was 11% and the mortality was zero. Among the 20 patients with simple hepatic cysts, 50% unexpectedly recurred. Among the 41 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, 21 patients (51%) underwent preoperative radiofrequency ablation therapy or transarterial chemoembolization. During parenchymal-transection, 11 received blood transfusion. The width of the resection margins was under 0.5 cm in 11 cases (27%); 0.5 to 1 cm in 22 cases (54%) and over 1 cm in eight cases (12%). There was no port site seeding, but argon beam coagulation-induced tumor dissemination was observed in two cases. The overall two-year survival rate was 75%. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the applications for LLR can be gradually expanded when assuring that the safety and curability of LLR are equivalent to that of open liver resection.

Laparoscopic liver resection: Report of 16 cases / 中国微创外科杂志

Objective To evaluate the anatomical basis and techniques in laparoscopic liver resections. Methods Entered the study there were 16 patients with both their lesions located at liver margin, or the surface of the right liver, or left liver and their liver functions classified as Child B or above, including 8 cases of primary liver cancer, 3 cases of liver hemangioma, 1 case of cholangiocarcinama, 1 case of hepatic adenoma, 1 case of focal nodular hyperplasia, 1 case of liver abscess and 1 case of infected liver cyst. The procedures were performed, via 4～6 epigastric ports, by using electriccautery, ultracision or endo-cutter for transecting liver and by titanic clip or medical albumin glue for dealing with the cut surface. Results Laparoscopic liver resection was completed under pneumoperitoneum in 16 cases (18 lesions), including 8 cases of local liver resection and 8 cases of anatomical left liver resection. The operation time was (206?75) min and the blood loss was (354?282) ml. An intraoperative blood transfusion of 800 ml was required in 2 cases because of a blood loss of 1000 ml. The abdominal drains were left for (2～4) days and no bile leakage, bleeding or other complications happened. The postoperative hospital stay was (5.8?1.6) days. Conclusions Proper dealing with hepatic portal vessels is the key to the laparoscopic liver resection. In order to effectively control the bleeding during the partial hepatectomy or left hemihepatectomy, it is crucial to fully dissect the sub-grade hepatic portal vessels.

A feasibility study laparoscopic liver resections of hepatolithiasis / 第三军医大学学报

Objective To assess the feasibility of hepatolithiasis treatment using laparoscopic liver resections. Methods A prospective study of laparoscopic liver resections was undertaken in selected patients with left intrahepatic stone, and these patients were operated by laparoscopic left lobectomy. Results Two cases were operated successfully. Mean blood loss was 400～600 ml. Conclusion Laparoscopic resections are feasible in selected patients with left intrahepatic stone and bring up a new method for hepatolithiasis.