Effectiveness of short fusion versus long fusion for degenerative scoliosis with a Cobb angle of 20-40° combined with spinal stenosis / 中国修复重建外科杂志

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of decompression and short fusion or long fusion for degenerative scoliosis (DS) with a Cobb angle of 20-40° combined with spinal stenosis. Methods: The clinical data of 50 patients with DS who were treated with decompression combined with short fusion or long fusion between January 2015 and May 2017 were retrospectively analysed. Patients were divided into long fusion group (fixed segments>3, 23 cases) and short fusion group (fixed segments≤3, 27 cases). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score of leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), thoracic kyphosis (TK), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic title (PT), and sacral slope (SS) between the two groups ( P>0.05); however, the VAS score of low back pain, Cobb angle, and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) in long fusion group were significantly higher than those in short fusion group ( P0.05). The Cobb angle, SVA, TLK, and PT significantly decreased, while SS and LL significantly increased in the long fusion group ( P0.05). The improvements of Cobb angle, SVA, LL, PT, and SS in the long fusion group were significantly higher than those in the short fusion group at last follow-up ( P<0.05). There was no perioperative death in both groups. The incidence of complications in the long fusion group was 34.8% (8/23), which was significantly higher than that in the short fusion group [11.1% (3/27)] ( χ2=4.056, P=0.034). Conclusion: The DS patients with the Cobb angle of 20-40°can achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes and improve the spino-pelvic parameters by choosing appropriate fixation levels. Short fusion has less surgical trauma and fewer complications, whereas long fusion has more advantages in enhancing spino-pelvic parameters and relieving low back pain.

Short-segment decompression/fusion versus long-segment decompression/fusion and osteotomy for Lenke-Silva type VI adult degenerative scoliosis / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

Background@#The effect of short-segment decompression/fusion versus long-segment decompression/fusion and osteotomy for Lenke-Silva type VI adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) has not been clarified. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic results of short-segment fusion vs. long-segment fusion and osteotomy for patients with Lenke-Silva type VI ADS.@*Methods@#Data of 28 patients who underwent spinal surgery for ADS from January 2012 to January 2014 in the General Hospital of Northern Theater Command were reviewed. Of the 28 patients, 12 received long-segment fusion and osteotomy and 16 received short-segment fusion. Radiographic imaging parameters and clinical outcomes, including the sagittal vertical axis (SVA), lumbar lordosis (LL) angle, pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), the visual analog scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and lumbar stiffness disability index (LSDI) scores, were recorded. The difference between groups was compared using the dependent t test or Chi-squared test.@*Results@#The Cobb and LL angles and SVA improved in both groups; however, PT and SS angles did not improve following short fusion. There were significant differences in the post-operative SVA (26.8 ± 5.4 mm vs. 47.5 ± 7.6 mm, t = -8.066, P < 0.001), PT (14.7 ± 1.8° vs. 29.1 ± 3.4°, t = -13.277, P < 0.001), and SS (39.8 ± 7.2° vs. 26.1 ± 3.3°, t = 6.175, P < 0.001) between the long and short fusion groups. All patients had improved ODI, JOA, and VAS scores post-operatively (all P < 0.001), with no significant difference between the groups (all P > 0.05). The post-operative LSDI score was 3.5 ± 0.5 in the long fusion group, which was significantly higher than that of the short fusion group (1.4 ± 0.7; P < 0.001).@*Conclusions@#The clinical outcomes of patients with Lenke-Silva type VI ADS who underwent short-segment decompression/fusion were comparable to those of patients who underwent long-segment decompression/fusion and osteotomy despite poor correction of sagittal imbalance. Moreover, short-segment decompression/fusion showed a short operation time and reduced surgical trauma.

Lumbosacral Fixation Using the Diagonal S2 Screw for Long Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Deformity: Technical Note Involving 13 Cases

Placing instrumentation into the ilium has been shown to increase the biomechanical stability and the fusion rates, but it has some disadvantages. The diagonal S2 screw technique is an attractive surgical procedure for degenerative lumbar deformity. Between 2008 and 2010, we carried out long fusion across the lumbosacral junction in 13 patients with a degenerative lumbar deformity using the diagonal S2 screws. In 12 of these 13 patients, the lumbosacral fusion was graded as solid fusion with obvious bridging bone (92%). One patient had a rod dislodge at one S2 screw and breakage of one S1 screw and underwent revision nine months postoperatively. So, we present alternative method of lumbopelvic fixation for long fusion in degenerative lumbar deformity using diagonal S2 screw instead of iliac screw.

A Comparison of Clinical Stability of Distal Instrument Fused Down to S1 with and without Sub-S1 Alar Screw in the Long Fusion using Segmental Pedicle Screw for Lumbar Degenerative Deformity

STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: We wanted to assess the stability of distal instrumentation using the bilateral S1 and sacral alar screws for the treatment of degenerative lumbar deformity. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: Various instrumentation methods have been introduced for increasing the strength of lumbosacral fusion. However, there are not many clinical studies that have evaluated the effectiveness of a sub-S1 alar screw for treating degenerative lumbar deformity surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 39 patients with degenerative lumbar deformity were treated by long fusion and we retrospectively analyzed these patients after a minimum follow-up of 1 year. All the patients underwent an operation with distal instrumentation using either bilateral S1 screws alone (the S1 group) or additional bilateral sub-S1 sacral alar screws (the SA group). There were 19 patients in the S1 group and 20 patients in the SA group. The stability of the distal instrumentation was assessed by breakage or backout of a rod and/or screws based on simple radiography. RESULTS: Instability of the distal instrumentation was detected in 6 cases (32%) in the S1 group and in 1 case (5%) in the SA group. The SA group had a more stability of the distal instrumentation than that of the S1 group with a significant difference (P0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral sacral alar screws coupled with bilateral S1 screws can provide good distal fixation for stability of the distal instrumentation when performing long fusion for treating degenerative lumbar deformity.

Comparison of Short Fusion versus Long Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: To compare the results of short fusion versus long fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients undergoing short fusion (n=28) and long fusion and instrumentation (n=19) were evaluated. Short fusion was defined as fusion within the deformity, not exceeding the upper end vertebra. Long fusion was defined as fusion extended above the upper end vertebra. The number of levels fused in the short and long fusion groups was 3.14 and 6.89 segments, respectively. RESULTS: Before surgery, the Cobb angle was 16.3 degrees in the short fusion group and 22 degrees in the long fusion group, which changed to 10.1 degrees and 8.47 degrees, respectively, at the last visit. The correction of coronal imbalance was better in the long fusion group. In contrast, the correction of sagittal imbalance was similar in both groups. The mean estimated blood loss in the short and long fusion groups was 1,671 ml and 2,742 ml, respectively. Early perioperative complications developed frequently in the long fusion group. Adjacent segment disease occurred more frequently in the short fusion group. CONCLUSION: Long fusion and instrumentation for degenerative lumbar scoliosis was better at correcting the coronal deformity and imbalance than short fusion but was ineffective in correcting the sagittal imbalance.

Pelvic Stress Fracture After Long Posterolateral Lumbosacral Fusions: A Case Report / 대한척추외과학회지

OBJECTIVES: To report a case of late stress-type fractures of the left pubic rami in a patient who had undergone long lumbosacral fusion. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: Longer fusions into the lumbosacral spine have been shown to increase significantly the stress and motion at adjacent segments. There were paucy reports concerned stress pubic rami fracture after posterolateral fusion without instrumentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 71 year-old woman underwent posterolateral fusion from L3 to S1 for spinal stenosis combined with degenerative spondyolisthesis. Eight years later, she had the insidious onset of left groin pain without trauma. RESULTS: Plain radiographs showed minimally displaced fractures of the left superior and inferior pubic rami. She was treated conservatively. At latest follow-up, she remained well and asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic stress fracture is a extremely rare sequela after long lumbosacral fusions. We report a case with left pubic rami fractures after long posterolateral lumbosacral fusion.