Determination of Adequate Entry Angle of Lumbar Sympathetic Ganglion Block in Korean

BACKGROUND: The target of lumbar sympathetic ganglion block is the anterolateral surface of the L2, 3 and 4 vertebral bodies, where the lumbar sympathetic ganglion usually lies. In most cases, a block-needle is inserted approximately 5-8 cm lateral to spinous process on the skin and directed to the anterolateral surface of vertebral body obliquely. The purpose of this study is to determine the safe entry angle and entry point in Korean by using the abdominal CT scan images. METHODS: The abdominal CT images of eighty five patients were recruited to this study. The minimal angle aimed at the lumbar sympathetic ganglion that can pass through the lateral aspect of body and maximal angle that avoids puncturing the kidney, ureter or retroperitoneal space were measured. The distance from midline to skin entry point was also measured. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in entry angle among L2, 3, and 4 level. The entry angle was similar in the right and left side, and in males and females. The entry angle of old age group was significantly smaller than that of young age group. The calculated safe entry angle was 30.5 +/- 0.4degrees and entry point was 7.7 +/- 0.2 cm and 6.7 +/- 0.1 cm lateral from midline in males and females respectively. CONCLUSION: These measurements can be used as a reference for lumbar sympathetic ganglion block and radiofrequency lesioning. Prior to performing the lumbar sympathetic ganglion block for cancer patients, the abdominal CT scan should be reviewed to prevent complications.

The Effects of Lumbar Sympathetic Ganglion Block in the Patients with Spinal Stenosis and the Skin Temperature Changes according to the Contrast Spread Patterns

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that if a fluoroscopic image of the lumbar sympathetic ganglion block (LSGB) showed the spread patterns of contrast at both the L2/3 and L4/5 disc areas, then this would demonstrate a more profound blockade effect because the spread patterns are close to sympathetic ganglia. In addition, we compared the effects of LSGB and transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) for the patients suffering with spinal stenosis. METHODS: Eighty patients were divided into two groups (Group S: the patients treated with TFESI, Group L: the patients treated with LSGB). The patients of group L were classified into three groups (groups A, B and, C) according to their contrast spread pattern. The preblock and postblock temperature difference between the ipsilateral and contralateral great toe (DT(pre), DT(post), degrees C), and the DTnet were calculated as follows. DT(net) = DT(post) - DT(pre). RESULTS: Both group showed a significant reduction of the visual analogue score (VAS) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) score. Only the patients of group L showed a significant increase of their walking distance (WD). Group A showed the most significant changes in the DT(post) (6.1 +/- 1.2degrees C, P = 0.021), and the DTnet (6.0 +/- 1.0degrees C, p = 0.023), as compared to group C. CONCLUSIONS: LSGB showed a similar effect on the VAS, and ODI, and a significant effect, on WD, compared with TFESI. Group A showed a significant sympatholytic effect, as compared to group C.

Lumbar Sympathetic Ganglion Block with Alcohol for Plantar Hyperhidrosis / 대한통증학회지

BACKGROUND: Chemical lumbar sympathetic ganglion block could potentially be used to treat plantar hyperhidrosis; therefore, we analyzed the outcome of lumbar sympathetic ganglion block using alcohol for the treatment of plantar hyperhidrosis. METHODS: Between March 1992 and June 2003, 356 patients with plantar hyperhidrosis underwent lumbar sympathetic ganglion block using alcohol. All 356 patients were followed up for 2 years and the results evaluated. There were 185 and 171 male and female patients, respectively, with a mean age of 25.1 years, ranging from 15.3 to 56.5 years old. Lumbar sympathetic ganglion block using alcohol was performed with fluoroscopic guidance under local anesthesia. RESULTS: The recurrence rate after 2 years was 34%. Compensatory hyperhidrosis, ejaculation failure, lower back pain and genitofemoral neuritis developed as complications in 132, 4, 12 and 2 patients, respectively. Of the 356 patients, 65% were satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar sympathetic ganglion block using alcohol is an effective and safe method for the treatment of plantar hyperhidrosis, but more information about the complications and relatively high recurrence rates should be provided to the patient.

A Review of Insertion Site for Lumbar Sympathetic Ganglion Block / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: Lumbar sympathetic ganglion block (LSGB) is one of the most frequently performed blocks in the field of interventional pain management. However, several complications can be expected if pain clinicians do not have a through understanding of radiological anatomy and current technique for locating block, landmarks are poor. Therefore, we devised a simple, safe, and patient tolerable block technique. METHODS: We selected patients scheduled for a LSGB with a body mass index of less than 25 kg/m2. After prone positioning, C-arm projection was adjusted obliquely until the tip of the L3 transverse process met the lateral margin of the corresponding vertebral body. Maintaining this angle, the skin entry point was determined at the lower one-third of the lateral margin of the vertebral body. We measured the distance from the mid-point of the spinous process to the skin entry point. A curved block needle was advanced using the tunnel vision technique, until the needle tip touched the lateral margin of the vertebral body. We also measured the position of the needle tip relative to the vertebral body in the lateral projection of the C-arm (lateral width percentage). Thereafter, the needle was slid along the lateral margin of the vertebral body to the anterior margin. RESULTS: The distance from the mid-point of the spinous process to the skin entry point was 6.5 +/- 1.0 cm. The angle of the C-arm projection was 22.0 +/- 3.8o. The depth from the skin entry point to the needle tip when touching the lateral margin of the vertebral body in the oblique projection of the C-arm was 8.5 +/- 0.9 cm. The lateral width percentage from the posterior margin of vertebral body was 49.0 +/- 7.0% and the entire depth of the curved needle from the skin entry point to the anterior margin of the vertebral body was 10.4 +/- 1.0 cm. CONCLUSIONS: This simple tunnel vision technique using a curved needle and an oblique C-arm projection is safe, simple and patient tolerable. In addition, it reduces block time and avoids repeated needle insertions. The tip of the L3 transverse process and the lateral margin of the corresponding vertebral body were found to be useful bony landmarks for the block. We believe that the provided depths and lateral width percentages may be useful for block in Koreans.

Infrared Thermographic Imaging in the Assessment of Successful Block on Lumbar Sympathetic Ganglion

This study examined the net changes in temperature at various regions of the lower extremities in an attempt to identify the regions demonstrating the most significant temperature changes following a lumbar sympathetic ganglion block (LSGB). Thermography was performed before and after the LSGB in 26 sympathetic nerve system disorder cases. The inspection points were the anterior and posterior surfaces of the thigh, the knee and leg, and the dorsal and plantar surfaces of the feet. The net increases in skin temperature following the LSGB (deltaT (net) ) at the plantar and dorsal surfaces of the feet, were 6.2 +/- 2.68 degrees C (mean +/- SD) and 3.9 +/- 1.89degrees C, respectively, which were higher than those observed in the other regions of the lower extremities (p < 0.05). The areas, in order of decreasing deltaT (net), are as follows: the plantar surface of the foot, the dorsal surface of the foot, the shin, the anterior surface of the knee, the calf, the posterior surface of the knee, the anterior surface of the thigh, and the posterior surface of the thigh. There was one case of orthostatic hypotension during the thermography procedure. In conclusion, thermographic imaging is a useful method for demonstrating the success of a LSGB in various diseases. An evaluation of the deltaT (net) on the plantar surface of the feet using thermographic imaging is the most effective, simple, and safe method for assessing a successful LSGB.