Histomorphometric study of machined titanium implants and calcium phosphate coated titanium implants / 대한치과보철학회지

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of calcium phosphate coated titanium implant surface on bone response and implant stability at early stage of healing period of 3 weeks and later healing period of 6 weeks. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 24 machined, screw-shaped implants (Dentium Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea) which dimensions were 3.3 mm in diameter and 5.0 mm in length, were used in this research. All implants (n = 24), made of commercially pure (grade IV) titanium, were divided into 2 groups. Twelve implants (n = 12) were machined without any surface modification (control). The test implants (n = 12) were anodized and coated with thin film (150 nm) of calcium phosphate by electron-beam deposition. The implants were placed on the proximal surface of the rabbit tibiae. The bone to implant contact (BIC) ratios was evaluated after 3 and 6 weeks of implant insertion. RESULTS: The BIC percentage of calcium phosphate coated implants (70.8 +/- 18.9%) was significantly higher than that of machined implants (44.1 +/- 16.5%) 3 weeks after implant insertion (P = 0.0264). However, there was no significant difference between the groups after 6 weeks of healing (P > .05). CONCLUSION: The histomorphometric evaluation of implant surface revealed that: 1. After 3 weeks early healing period, bone to implant contact (BIC) percentage of calcium phosphate coated implants (70.8%) was much greater than that of surface untreated machined implants (44.1%) with P = 0.0264. 2. After 6 weeks healing period, however, BIC percentage of calcium phosphate coated implants group (79.0%) was similar to the machined only implant group (78.6%). There was no statistical difference between two groups (P = 0.8074). 3. We found the significant deference between the control group and experimental group during the early healing period of 3 weeks. But no statistical difference was found between two groups during the later of 6 weeks.

Evidencia de cambios clínicos y radiográficos en implantes oseointegrados de superficie maquinada y modificada, 3-12 meses de seguimiento / Evidence of clinical and radiographic changes in machined and modified surface osseointegrated implants. 3 to 12 months follow up

En este estudio se realizó una evaluación clínica y radiográfica entre un grupo de pacientes con implantes de superficie maquinada y otro grupo con superficie modificada para determinar si existe alguna diferencia significativa que justifique la utilización de una u otra superficie; para ello se trabajó con dos tipos de implantes de la casa comercial Lifecore®, un grupo con 30 implantes de superficie maquinada o lisa (SuperCAT®) y 30 implantes de superficie modificada o rugosa (RBM®), de conexión externa, tipo tornillo, para la restauración de diente único. El procedimiento quirúrgico se realizó de acuerdo con las recomendaciones del fabricante y a los seis meses se realizó la cirugía de destape y se colocó una restauración temporal. Se siguieron los parámetros de Roos y colaboradores (1997) para la evaluación clínica y radiográfica. Se obtuvo el 100% de oseointegración de los implantes para ambos grupos. La pérdida ósea promedio fue de 0,78 mm. No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la evaluación clínica y radiográfica entre los dos grupos de implantes de superficie maquinada o modificada para la restauración de diente único.

The aim of this study is to undertake a clinical and radiographic evaluation between two different patient groups: machined versus modified surface, to find out if there is statistically significant difference that support the use of implants with different surface properties. Sixty screw, external hex connection implants were examined: one group with 30 machined surface implants (SuperCAT®), and a second group with 30 implants with modified surface (RBM®), for restoring a single tooth. The surgical procedure was performed according with the manufacturer’s protocol. After six months the second phase surgery was performed and the temporary restoration was placed. At this point, the first radiographic evaluation was made. The Roos et al (1997) parameters were followed for the clinical and radiographic evaluation. A 100% of osseointegration was accomplished in both groups. The average marginal bone loss was 0.78 mm, without significant differences between the groups. All implants were reported as success grade 1, with no complications. There are not significant differences between the two groups of machined and modified implant surfaces for single tooth restoration.

Comparision of Osseointegration Depending on Surface Treatment / 대한치주과학회지

The present study was performed to evaluate histomorphological difference in various surface-treated implants in beagle. Implants(Implantium(R), Dentium Co. Korea) with pure titanium machined surface, acid treated surface, and Al2O3(50~100micrometer)blasted with acid treated surface were used in this study. All mandibular premolars of 1.5~2 year old male beagle dogs were extracted. At 3 months after extraction, the implants(phi 4mm, l6mm) were installed. The beagle were sacrificed at 1, 3 months after installation and then tissues including implants were prepared for non-decalcified specimens. These specimens were analyzed comparatively under light microscope. The results of this study were as follow 1. Higher rate of osseointegration were showed in the Al2O3(50~100micrometer)blasted with acid-treated surface. 2. Increased osseointegration were showed in the Al2O3(50~100micrometer)blasted with acidtreated surface with time. 3. Higher maturation of integration were showed in the Al2O3(50~100micrometer)blasted with acid-treated surface. In conclusion, surface treatment of Al2O3blasted with acid might be considered to shorten healing time and improve success rate as increasing contact of implant and bone.

A study on the change of implant stability using resonance frequency analysis / 대한치과보철학회지

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) has been increasingly served as a non-invasive and objective method for clinical monitoring of implant stability. Many clinical studies must be required for standardized baseline data using RFA. PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate RFA value changes in two stage surgery group and one stage surgery group in patients. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Forty-seven mandibles in consecutively implant installed patients were selected for this study and 141 fixtures were installed. Ninety-three fixtures were double threaded, machined surface design (Bra.nemark. MK III, Nobel Biocare AB, Go teborg, Sweden) and 48 fixtures were root form, threaded, HA-coated surface one (Replace(TM), Steri-Oss/Nobel Biocare AB, USA). Among those, each 10 fixture was installed in one stage group patients. ISQ values were measured using Osstell(TM) (Integration Diagnostics Ltd. Sweden) during fixture installation, at healing abutment connection and in the loading period for two stage surgery group patients and during at each 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 week and in the loading phase for one stage surgery group patients and evaluated the changes according to the time and fixture type. RESULTS: In two stage surgery group, mean and SD of ISQ values of machined surface implants were 76.85 +/- 3.74, 75.76 +/- 5.04, 75.73 +/- 4.41 and those of HA-coated surface implant were 75.05 +/- 6.23, 77.58 +/- 5.23, 78.32 +/- 4.29 during fixtures installation, at healing abutment connection and in the loading period, respectively. In one-stage surgery group, the ISQ values of machined surface and HA-coated surface implants decreased until 4 or 6 week and maintained at plateau for 1-3 week and increased to the loading period. CONCLUSIONS: Machined and HA-coated surface implants showed minimal ISQ changes with time if they were installed at the sites showing at least intact cortical plate and good bone qualities. And HA-coated implants had a tendency to show somewhat increased ISQ values with time.