Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Fisioter. Pesqui. (Online) ; 28(4): 400-407, out.-dez. 2021. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1364869

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP and MEP) assess the strength index of the respiratory muscles. These measures are relevant to assess respiratory muscle strength and for clinical monitoring. This study evaluates papers that suggest predictive equations of MIP and MEP for the Brazilian population. We included studies that established prediction equations for MIP and MEP for the healthy Brazilian population, aged from 4 to 90 years old, both men and women and that had the maximum respiratory pressures measured in a sitting position. A search was carried out in March 2020 on MEDLINE, LILACS, Cochrane, SciELO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases, without date or language filters. The descriptors used were "muscle strength," "equations," "predictive respiratory muscles" and their respective synonyms. Out of the 3,920 studies found in databases, 963 were duplicates, 2,779 were excluded, 178 had their full texts analyzed, and only 9 met the inclusion criteria. The predictive equations of ventilatory muscle strength analyzed in this review used age, weight, and stature as variables. However, the studies showed methodological weaknesses, such as lack of cross-validation of the equation, exclusion of outliers, and lack of familiarization of MIP and MEP.


RESUMO As pressões respiratórias máximas (PImáx e PEmáx) avaliam o índice de força dos músculos respiratórios. Essas medidas são relevantes para a avaliação da força muscular respiratória e para o monitoramento clínico. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar os artigos que sugerem equações preditivas de PImáx e PEmáx para a população brasileira. Foram incluídos estudos que estabeleceram equações de predição para PImáx e PEmáx da população brasileira saudável, com idades entre 4 e 90 anos e de ambos os sexos, que mediam as pressões respiratórias máximas na posição sentada. Uma pesquisa foi realizada, em março de 2020, nas bases de dados MEDLINE, LILACS, Cochrane, SciELO, CINAHL, Web of Science e SCOPUS, sem filtros de tempo ou idioma. Os descritores utilizados foram "força muscular", "equações" e "músculos respiratórios preditivos", com seus respectivos sinônimos. Dos 3.920 estudos encontrados nas bases de dados, 963 eram duplicados e 2.779 foram excluídos, 178 tiveram seus textos analisados integralmente e apenas 9 atendiam aos critérios de inclusão. As variáveis utilizadas nas equações preditivas de força muscular ventilatória analisadas nesta revisão foram: idade, peso e estatura. No entanto, os estudos mostraram fragilidades metodológicas, como falta de validação cruzada da equação, exclusão de outliers e familiarização do PImáx e PEmáx.


RESUMEN Las presiones inspiratoria y espiratoria máximas (PImáx y PEmáx) evalúan el índice de fuerza muscular respiratoria. Estas medidas son importantes en la evaluación de la fuerza muscular respiratoria y el seguimiento clínico. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar los artículos proponen ecuaciones predictivas para PImáx y PEmáx a la población brasileña. Se incluyeron estudios que establecieron ecuaciones predictivas para PImáx y PEmáx a la población brasileña sana de ambos sexos, de entre 4 y 90 años de edad, y que miden las presiones respiratorias máximas en posición sentada. Se realizó, en marzo de 2020, una búsqueda en las bases de datos MEDLINE, LILACS, Cochrane, SciELO, CINAHL, Web of Science y SCOPUS, sin año de publicación específico ni idioma. Los descriptores utilizados fueron "fuerza muscular", "ecuaciones" y "músculos respiratorios predictivos" y sus respectivos sinónimos. De los 3.920 estudios encontrados, 963 eran duplicados y se excluyeron 2.779, así se analizaron 178 textos en su totalidad y solo 9 cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión. Las variables edad, peso y talla fueron las que habían sido utilizadas en las ecuaciones predictivas de fuerza muscular respiratoria analizadas por esta revisión. Sin embargo, los estudios apuntaron limitaciones metodológicas, como falta de validación cruzada de la ecuación, exclusión de outliers y familiaridad de la PImáx y PEmáx.

2.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-185223

ABSTRACT

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a common disease seen in Indian population. It is most commonly seen in the lower strata where beedi and cigarette smoking is most prevalent and starts at an early age. Smoke arising from cooking stoves during cooking is the cause of COPD in females. Though the number of males suffering from COPD is much larger than females, we observed a proportionate number of females in all age group suffering from this disease. It is the leading cause of mortality and should be studied in detail so as to avoid complications in such patients. We have studied the strength of respiratory muscles in such patients using newer techniques like Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP) and 7 8 Maximal Expiratory Pressure (MEP). Terzano et al. (2008) and Khalil et al.(2014) have carried out similar studies in COPD patients. We have checked correlation between anthropometric measurements and strength of respiratory muscles, correlation between airway resistance and muscle strength and also compared the sensitivity and specificity of this technique using ROC (receiver operating Curve) as compared to the age old spirometry. These techniques may help in monitoring the status of COPD patients and assessing muscle weakness.

3.
Journal of Clinical Neurology ; : 361-367, 2016.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-125900

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Evaluating respiratory function is important in neuromuscular diseases. This study explored the reference ranges of the maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), and sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) in healthy adults, and applied them to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients. METHODS: MIP, MEP, and SNIP were measured in 67 healthy volunteers aged from 21 to 82 years. Reference ranges were evaluated by multivariate regression analysis using the generalized additive modeling of location, scale, and shape method. Thirty-six ALS patients were reviewed retrospectively, and abnormal values of MIP, MEP, and SNIP were determined according to the reference ranges. RESULTS: MIP, MEP, and SNIP were abnormal in 57.1%, 51.4%, and 25.7% of the ALS patients, respectively. MIP and SNIP were significantly correlated with the degree of restrictive pattern and respiratory symptoms. The ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised score was correlated with SNIP. CONCLUSIONS: This study has provided the reference range of respiratory muscle strength in healthy adults. This range is suitable for evaluating respiratory function in ALS patients.


Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , Healthy Volunteers , Methods , Neuromuscular Diseases , Reference Values , Respiratory Muscles , Retrospective Studies
4.
Experimental Neurobiology ; : 351-357, 2015.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-228166

ABSTRACT

Most amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients show focal onset of upper and lower motor neuron signs and spread of symptoms to other regions or the other side clinically. Progression patterns of sporadic ALS are unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pattern of respiratory deterioration in sporadic ALS according to the onset site by using respiratory function tests. Study participants included 63 (42 cervical-onset [C-ALS] and 21 lumbosacral-onset [L-ALS]) ALS patients and 31 healthy controls. We compared respiratory function test parameters among the 3 groups. Age was 57.4+/-9.6 (mean+/-SD), 60.8+/-9, and 60.5+/-7 years, and there were 28, 15, and 20 male participants, in the C-ALS, L-ALS, and control groups, respectively. Disease duration did not differ between C-ALS and L-ALS patients. Sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) was significantly low in C-ALS patients compared with controls. Maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) and forced vital capacity percent predicted (FVC% predicted) were significantly low in C-ALS and L-ALS patients compared with controls. Maximal inspiratory pressure to maximal expiratory pressure (MIP:MEP) ratio did not differ among the 3 groups. Eighteen C-ALS and 5 L-ALS patients were followed up. DeltaMIP, DeltaMEP, DeltaSNIP, DeltaPEF, and DeltaFVC% predicted were higher in C-ALS than L-ALS patients without statistical significance. Fourteen C-ALS (77.8%) and 3 L-ALS (60%) patients showed a constant MIP:MEP ratio above or below 1 from the first to the last evaluation. Our results suggest that vulnerability of motor neurons in sporadic ALS might follow a topographic gradient.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , Motor Neurons , Respiratory Function Tests , Vital Capacity
5.
An. acad. bras. ciênc ; 83(3): 967-972, Sept. 2011. ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-595538

ABSTRACT

The respiratory muscles can present fatigue and even chronic inability to generate force. So, reliable devices are necessary to their evaluation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the MEP (Maximal Expiratory Pressure) values of individuals between 20 and 25 years old and to validate a protocol using a pressure transducer and a signal conditioner comparing it with the digital manometer. We evaluated the MEP of 10 participants. They remained seated and made six respiratory maneuvers from Total Lung Capacity (TLC) to Residual Volume (RV). The results in the study showed no statistically significant differences when compared to values reported in the literature, and that the pressure transducer provides reliable values for MEP.


Os músculos respiratórios podem apresentar fadiga e até mesmo a incapacidade crônica na geração de força, sendo necessários dispositivos confiáveis para sua avaliação. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a pressão expiratória máxima (PeMáx) de indivíduos entre 20 e 25 anos e validar um protocolo que utiliza um transdutor de pressão e um condicionador de sinais comparando-o com a manovacuometria. Foram avaliadas a PeMáx de 10 participantes. Estes permaneceram sentados e realizaram seis manobras respiratórias a partir da capacidade pulmonar total (CPT) até o volume residual (VR). Os resultados do estudo não apresentaram diferenças estatisticamente significativas quando comparados com os valores de normalidade descritos na literatura e mostraram que o transdutor de pressão fornece valores confiáveis para Pe máx.


Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Forced Expiratory Volume/physiology , Residual Volume/physiology , Respiratory Muscles/physiology , Transducers, Pressure , Total Lung Capacity/physiology , Reference Values
6.
Arq. méd. ABC ; 32(2)jul.-dez. 2007. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-499517

ABSTRACT

Comparar a força muscular respiratória (FMR)entre obesas mórbidas com mulheres eutróficas da mesmafaixa etária. Método: Foram avaliadas doze mulheres obesasmórbidas (média de idade de 26 ± 5 anos e IMC – índice demassa corpórea de 47 ± 6 kg/m2) e doze mulheres eutróficas(27 ± 4 anos e IMC de 24 ± 2 kg/m2). Em ambos os grupos,foram realizadas as medidas antropométricas e testada a FMRcom um manovacuômetro (Gerar MVD300) sendo obtidas aspressões inspiratória máxima (PImax) e expiratória máxima(PEmax). As voluntárias foram previamente instruídas quantoà realização correta das manobras, permanecendo sentadas eusando um clipe nasal. A PImax foi obtida a partir do volumeresidual e a PEmax a partir da capacidade pulmonar total. O testet de Student não pareado foi utilizado para comparar os valorespressóricos entre os grupos, e o teste t de Student pareado paracomparar os valores obtidos com os previstos, sendo o nívelde significância de 5%, para ambos os testes. Resultados: Foiverificada redução significativa tanto dos valores da PImax (74± 32 versus 102 ± 9 cmH20) como da PEmax (66 ± 28 versus107 ± 12cmH20) no grupo de mulheres obesas em relação aogrupo de mulheres eutróficas, respectivamente. Quando comparadocom os valores previstos, foi verificado que as mulheres obesasapresentaram menores valores para PImax (76% do predito) epara a PEmax (67% do predito), respectivamente. Conclusão: Aforça muscular respiratória parece estar prejudicada na presençade obesidade mórbida.


To compare respiratory muscle strength betweenmorbid obesity women with matched paired eutrophic women.Method: Twelve morbid obese women (26 ± 5 years and bodymass index – BMI = 47 ± 6 kg/m2) and twelve eutrophic women(27 ± 4 years and BMI = 24 ± 2 kg/m2) were evaluated. In bothgroups, the anthropometric measurements were taken andrespiratory muscle strength (RMS) was tested with a digitalmanovacuometer (Gerar MVD300) obtaining the maximal inspiratoryand expiratory pressures (PImax and PEmax; respectively). Allsubjects were previously instructed regarding the correct conductduring the maneuvers, maintaining sitting position and using anasal clip. PImax was inferred from residual volume and PEmaxwas obtained from total lung capacity. Unpaired Student t testwas used to compare inter-group pressure values, and pairedStudent t test was used to compare the real and predictedvalues, considering significant level 5%, for both tests. Results:It was verified significant reduction in both PImax and PEmaxfor morbid obese women when compared with control grouprespectively (PImax = 74 ± 32 versus 102 ± 9 cmH20 andPEmax = 66 ± 28 versus 107 ± 12 cmH20). When comparedthe reference with obtained values, lower values for PImax andPEmax (76% and 67% of predicted, respectively) in morbid obesewomen were observed. Conclusion: The respiratory musclestrength may be harmed in morbid obesity.


Subject(s)
Adult , Maximal Voluntary Ventilation , Obesity, Morbid/complications
7.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-136778

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study was to compare the pulmonary function, respiratory muscle strength, and physical activity level between obese and non-obese children and to determine the correlation between pulmonary function, respiratory muscle strength and physical activity level in both child groups. Methods: Thai healthy children aged between 10-12 years participated in this study. They were classified into an obese group with body weight > +3 standard deviations and a non-obese group with body weight between+ 1.5 standard deviations of children who have the same height. Children in both groups were measured for pulmonary function, forced vital capacity (FVC), and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), FEV1/FVC ratio, vital capacity (VC), inspiratory muscle strength (MIP), expiratory muscle strength (MEP), and physical activity level. Results: The results showed that FVC, FEV1 and VC of the obese group were statistically higher than the non-obese group (p<0.05). FEV1/FVC ratio of the obese group was statistically lower than the non-obese group (p<0.05). MIP and MEP were not significantly different between the groups (p>0.05). Physical activity levels were not significantly different between the groups (p>0.05). Moreover, the results demonstrated that physical activity level in the obese group had no correlation with FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC ratio and VC (r = 0.203, 0.170, -0.067 and 0.133 respectively; p > 0.05) and similarly the non-obese group showed no correlation with FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC ratio and VC (r = 0.225, 0.168, -0.207 and 0.168 respectively; p > 0.05). Additionally, the results demonstrated that physical activity level in the obese group had no correlation with MIP and MEP (r = 0.151 and 0.355 respectively; p > 0.05) and similarly the non-obese group showed no correlation with MIP and MEP (r = 0.202 and 0.006 respectively; p > 0.05). Conclusion: This study provides information about the pulmonary function and respiratory muscle strength in Thai obese children. FVC, FEV1 and VC of the obese group were higher than the non-obese group. In addition, FEV1/FVC ratio of the obese group was lower than the non-obese group. Although, all parameters including pulmonary function of both groups were in the normal range. However, obese children tend to observe airway obstruction higher than non-obese children. Moreover, respiratory muscle strength and physical activity level were not different between groups. Additionally, physical activity level had no correlation with pulmonary function and respiratory muscle strength in both groups.

8.
Yonsei Medical Journal ; : 184-190, 2006.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-113993

ABSTRACT

The function of inspiratory muscles is crucial for effective cough as well as expiratory muscles in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). However, there is no report on the correlation between cough and inspiratory muscle strength. To investigate the relationships of voluntary cough capacity, assisted cough techniques, and inspiratory muscle strength as well as expiratory muscle strength in patients with DMD (n=32). The vital capacity (VC), maximum insufflation capacity (MIC), maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) were measured. Unassisted peak cough flow (UPCF) and three different techniques of assisted PCF were evaluated. The mean value of MICs (1918 +/- 586 mL) was higher than that of VCs (1474 +/- 632 mL) (p < 0.001). All three assisted cough methods showed significantly higher value than unassisted method (212 +/- 52 L/min) (F = 66.13, p < 0.001). Combined assisted cough technique (both manual and volume assisted PCF; 286 +/- 41 L/min) significantly exceeded manual assisted PCF (MPCF; 246 +/- 49 L/ min) and volume assisted PCF (VPCF; 252 +/- 45 L/min) (F = 66.13, p < 0.001). MIP (34 +/- 13 cmH2O) correlated significantly with both UPCF and all three assisted PCFs as well as MEP (27 +/- 10 cmH2O) (p < 0.001). Both MEP and MIP, which are the markers of respiratory muscle weakness, should be taken into account in the study of cough effectiveness.


Subject(s)
Male , Humans , Adult , Adolescent , Respiratory Muscles/pathology , Pressure , Oxygen Consumption , Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne/genetics , Muscles/pathology , Muscle Weakness/pathology , Models, Statistical , Inspiratory Capacity , Cough , Biopsy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL