ABSTRACT
@#Introduction: Staphylococcus aureus is part of the normal human flora that can commonly be found on the skin and mucous membranes of the nasal area. However, in immunosuppressed patients such as those with kidney failures, colonization can potentially lead to infection. There is a concern of increasing antibiotic resistance in S. aureus. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of S. aureus nasal colonization and its antimicrobial susceptibility among haemodialysis-dependent populations. Methods: A cross-sectional study at the Nephrology Unit, Hospital Canselori Tuanku Mukhriz (HCTM) was conducted among haemodialysis-dependent patients between February 2017 to February 2018. Nasal swabs were obtained and cultured on mannitol salt agar. S. aureus isolates were identified by gram staining, tube coagulase and Deoxyribonuclease (DNase). Cefoxitin disc (30 µg) were used to identified the presence of MRSA (methicillin-resistance S. aureus). The S. aureus colonies were further tested against six antibiotics using Kirby Bauer disc diffusion. Result: A total of 134 patients were recruited. S. aureus isolates were detected from 27 patients (20.1%). All S. aureus were phenotypically identified as methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) based on the cefoxitin disc. Teicoplanin and linezolid were the most effective with 100% susceptibility. S. aureus exhibited a high resistance rate towards erythromycin (29.6%). No MRSA was isolated in this study. Conclusion: This study highlighted the high prevalence of S. aureus nasal colonization in haemodialysis patients. Teicoplanin and linezolid were found to be the most effective antibiotics against isolated S. aureus.
ABSTRACT
@#Introduction: Methicillin-Resistance Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is known as a major nosocomial pathogen in healthcare. However, it has now spread in the community known as community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA). Thus, the survival and pathogenicity of CA-MRSA isolates were assessed using in vivo peritonitis model with comparison to ATCC-MRSA. Two CA-MRSA isolates; CA-MRSA1 and CA-MRSA2 that were isolated from healthy population, were studied and compared. Methods: Mice were assigned into 4 groups and injected intraperitoneally with ATCC-MRSA, CA-MRSA1 or CA-MRSA2, respectively. Sterile Dulbecco’s Phosphate-Buffered Saline (DPBS) represents negative control. Mice were observed twice daily, 0-72 hours of post-infection. Any signs of distress were recorded for severity score and survival analyses. Mice were euthanised at 72 hours post-inoculation or by referring to the Peritonitis Severity Scoring (PSS) system. Organs of interest, peritoneal lavage and abscess were processed for bacterial counts. Tissue samples were analysed for histopathological scores. Results: All mice inoculated with MRSA showed clear signs of illness with peritonitis symptoms of p<0.001 and comparable PSS scores were recorded in all infected mice groups. Intraperitoneal injection of lethal dose of MRSA resulted in significant death of ATCC-MRSA (p<0.05) and CA-MRSA-infected mice (p<0.01), compared to the un-infected. Bacterial burden was significantly high in all samples harvested from mice challenged with CA-MRSA2 compared to ATCC-MRSA except in abscess and lung. Significant liver necrosis and spleen inflammation were observed in CA-MRSA1, and lung inflammation in ATCC-MRSA-infected mice. Conclusion: Nasal carriage CA-MRSA isolates from a healthy population has the potential to cause peritonitis with comparable severity as ATCC-MRSA.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the effect of linezolid on procalcitonin ( PCT) in the treatment of methicillin resistant staphylococcus ( MRS) infection.Methods 85 cases with MRS infection in our hospital were grouped, control group received vancomycin treatment, study group received linezolid, 2 weeks for 1 courses.Clinical effect were compared to explore the linezolid effect of PCT levels in patients with MRS infection.Results After treatment, defervescence time, bacterial clearance time, bacterial clearance rate and 48 hour mortality rate between two groups of patients had no significant difference.Compared with the control group, ICU treatment time in the study group was significantly lower ( P<0.05 ) .There was no significant difference in total effective rate between two groups.After treatment, the PCT and CRP in study group were lower than control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Linezolid has significant function to reduce the serum PCT level of patients with methicillin-resistant staphylococcus infection procalcitonin, which has better clinical curative effect.
ABSTRACT
Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection is a global concern nowadays. Due to its multi-drug resistant nature, treatment with conventional antibiotics does not assure desired clinical outcomes. Therefore, there is a need to find new compounds and/or alternative methods to get arsenal against the pathogen. Combination therapies using conventional antibiotics and phytochemicals fulfill both requirements. In this study, the efficacy of different phytochemicals in combination with selected antibiotics was tested against 12 strains of S. aureus (ATCC MRSA 43300, ATCC methicillin sensitive S. aureus or MSSA 29213 and 10 MRSA clinical strains collected from National University Hospital, Singapore). Out of the six phytochemicals used, tannic acid was synergistic with fusidic acid, minocycline, cefotaxime and rifampicin against most of strains tested and additive with ofloxacin and vancomycin. Quercetin showed synergism with minocycline, fusidic acid and rifampicin against most of the strains. Gallic acid ethyl ester showed additivity against all strains in combination with all antibiotics under investigation except with vancomycin where it showed indifference effect. Eugenol, menthone and caffeic acid showed indifference results against all strains in combination with all antibiotics. Interestingly, no antagonism was observed within these interactions. Based on the fractional inhibitory concentration indices, synergistic pairs were further examined by time-kill assays to confirm the accuracy and killing rate of the combinations over time. The two methods concurred with each other with 92% accuracy and the combinatory pairs were effective throughout the 24 hours of assay. The study suggests a possible incorporation of effective phytochemicals in combination therapies for MRSA infections.
Subject(s)
Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/analysis , Disease Susceptibility , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Methicillin Resistance , Methicillin/analysis , Methicillin/isolation & purification , Staphylococcal Infections , Staphylococcus aureus , Drug Synergism , Methods , PatientsABSTRACT
Methicillin resistance Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an important nosocomial pathogen that causes severe morbidity and mortality worldwide. In recent years, nosocomial outbreaks of methicillin resistance Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has become a major infection control problem. Colonized employees are generally asymptomatic; they are a potential reservoir and disseminator of MRSA in hospitals. Nasal screening of health care workers (HCW) for MRSA is performed routinely in several countries, typically when more than one MRSA – colonized patient is identified in high risk ward, such as intensive care unit (ICU). This study was performed at PSG Hospitals to assess the prevalence of MRSA nasal colonization in health care workers and their sensitivity pattern. The prevalence of MRSA carriage among HCW’s was quite low (3.3%) in our institution. It has been recommended that, in case of epidemic in the hospital, all health care workers should be examined for MRSA colonization.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:To explore new therapy regimen for methicillin-resistance staphylococcus infection chronic osteomyelitis. METHODS:27 patients with methicillin-resistance staphylococcus infection chronic osteomyelitis were randomly divides into 2 groups. Both groups were injected with norvancomycin intravenously before operation to prevent infection. Norvancomycin chain bead (NCB) which were made from norvancomycin and bone cement was used to make up bone defect in NCB group(15 patients). Bone cement was used to make up bone defect in norvancomycin group(12 patients). The cure rates, the cost of infection therapy, the incidence of ADR and therapy duration were compared between 2 groups. RESULTS: Both NCB and intravenous administration of norvancomycin had sound effect on chronic osteomyelitis. The incidence of ADR and the cost of infection therapy of NCB regimen were close to low level. The infection was controlled effectively. CONCLUSION:Individual NCB regimen is superior to intravenous administration of norvancomycin in the treatment of methicillin-resistance staphylococcus infection chronic osteomyelitis.