ABSTRACT
Objective · To compare the clinical efficacy of cryotherapy and microwave therapy for Little's area idiopathic epistaxis in children.Methods · Clinical data of 675 children with idiopathic epistaxis treated in outpatient service of Renji Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from July 2009 to July 2015 were collected, who were divided into cryotherapy group (566 cases) and microwave therapy group (109 cases). The overall inadequacy of the patients was evaluated by the visual analogue scale (VAS) in the operation, and then the patients were followed up for one year. The curative rates of the two groups were compared. Results · The curative rates of cryotherapy group and microwave therapy group were 96.20% and 86.67%, respectively. The VAS score of the cryotherapy group was better than that of the microwave therapy group (P=0.000), and the mucosa of the cryotherapy group recovered well without scars. Conclusion · The cryotherapy for Little's area idiopathic epistaxis in children was safe,effective and simple, with the mucosa recovering well postoperatively, which can improve curative rate and reduce patients' pain. Meanwhile it was more economical, and easier to be accepted by patients and their families.
ABSTRACT
Objective · To compare the clinical efficacy of cryotherapy and microwave therapy for Little's area idiopathic epistaxis in children.Methods · Clinical data of 675 children with idiopathic epistaxis treated in outpatient service of Renji Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from July 2009 to July 2015 were collected, who were divided into cryotherapy group (566 cases) and microwave therapy group (109 cases). The overall inadequacy of the patients was evaluated by the visual analogue scale (VAS) in the operation, and then the patients were followed up for one year. The curative rates of the two groups were compared. Results · The curative rates of cryotherapy group and microwave therapy group were 96.20% and 86.67%, respectively. The VAS score of the cryotherapy group was better than that of the microwave therapy group (P=0.000), and the mucosa of the cryotherapy group recovered well without scars. Conclusion · The cryotherapy for Little's area idiopathic epistaxis in children was safe,effective and simple, with the mucosa recovering well postoperatively, which can improve curative rate and reduce patients' pain. Meanwhile it was more economical, and easier to be accepted by patients and their families.
ABSTRACT
With the enforcement of YY 0505-2012 standard,more attention has been paid to the electromagnetic compatibility test of medical electrical equipment.In all the test items involved in YY 0505-2012,the radiation emission test is the most complicated and the hardest to be passed,so it is very important to master the test method.Microwave therapy equipment is a kind of equipment using microwave radiation energy to treat diseases,and is supervised as class Ⅲ medical equipment.According to the requirements of the relevant standards,all the electromagnetic compatibility testing items of microwave equipment are listed,and the test difficulty and the test focus of the equipment are studied.In the frequency band of the radiation emission experiment,microwave treatment equipment is divided into different categories according to the purpose and environment of the application.By comparing the data of the tests,the differences of different classes of microwave treatment equipment in the radiation emission tests are summarized.
ABSTRACT
Objective To observe therapeutic effects of compounded zedoary turmeric oil suppository com-bined with microwave therapy on cervical erosion. Methods Women with cervical erosion were randomly divided in-to two groups: single microwave therapy group (control group) and compounded zedoary turmeric oil suppository com-bined with microwave therapy group (observation group). The chnical cure rate, obvious effective rate and ineffective rate were compared between two groups. Results In mild erosion, the clinical cure rate, obvious effective rate and ineffective rate were 87.8%, 12.2% ,0 respectively in the observation group. In tbe control group were 85.7%, 14.3%,0 respectively, and there was no significant difference between them (P >0.05); In moderate erosion, were 86.1%, 12.8%, 1.2% respectively in the observation group; were 60.9%, 31.9%, 7.2% respectively in the control group and there was significant difference between them (P < 0.01); In severe erosion, were 59.4%, 34.4%, 6.2% respectively in the observation group; were 29.17%, 41.7%, 29.2% respectively in the control group, and there was significant difference between them (P < 0.05). Conclusion Single microwave therapy to the mild erosion was suf-ficient; nevertheless, compounded zedoary turmeric oil suppository combined with microwave therapy to moderate and severe erosion was better than single microwave therapy.
ABSTRACT
@# Objective To analyse the effect of microwave therapy on tennis elbow. Methods 60 patients with tennis elbow during September, 2007 to September, 2008 were divided into treatment group and control group. The treatment received microwave therapy while control group was treated with Diclofenac Diethylamine. All patients were evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) before and after the treatment.Results The VAS is lower in the treatment group than in the control group(P<0.01). Conclusion Microwave therapy is effective on tennis elbow.