ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:Total knee arthroplasty is an effective treatment for late-stage osteoarthritis,but postoperative pain and joint function recovery are the main challenges.Nerve block and mixed drug injection are two common pain relief methods,but the effect of their combined use is still unclear. OBJECTIVE:To investigate the effects of ultrasound-guided continuous adductor canal block+single sciatic nerve block+"cocktail"mixed drug analgesia on postoperative pain relief and joint function recovery in total knee arthroplasty. METHODS:120 patients with osteoarthritis admitted to Hebei Province Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine from January to May 2022 were randomly divided into two groups(n=60).The observation group received ultrasound-guided continuous adductor canal block+single sciatic nerve block+"cocktail"mixed drug analgesia.The control group received ultrasound-guided continuous adductor canal block+single sciatic nerve block.The differences in visual analog scale score,hospital for special surgery score,pain mediators,expression levels of inflammatory factors,the occurrence of adverse reactions,and postoperative barehanded muscle strength test were compared between the two groups. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1)The visual analog scale scores at rest and exercise were lower in the observation group than those in the control group at 6,8,12,24,48,and 72 hours postoperatively(P<0.05).(2)Hospital for special surgery scores at 1 and 3 months postoperatively were significantly higher in the observation group than those in the control group(P<0.05).(3)In terms of pain mediators and inflammatory factors,the expression levels were significantly lower in the observation group than those in the control group(P<0.05).(4)There was no statistically significant difference in terms of adverse effects and postoperative barehanded muscle strength examination between the two groups(P>0.05).(5)In total knee arthroplasty,ultrasound-guided continuous adductor canal block and single sciatic nerve block,together with a"cocktail"mixed drug analgesia injected into the joint cavity,can provide excellent analgesia,facilitate the recovery of joint function,and relieve postoperative pain and inflammation with a high degree of safety.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Propofol is a useful induction agent, but it can cause hypotention and bradycardia. Meanwhile, ephedrine has alpha-vasoconstriction and beta-cardiac stimulant effect. The purpose of this study was to assess the hemodynamic effects of adding various doses of ephedrine to propofol to obtund adverse hemodynamic response and to determine the optimal dose. METHODS: Unpremedicated 120 ASA physical status I adult patients (20~50yrs) scheduled for elective surgery were randomly allocated into four groups according to the doses of ephedrine added to propofol (1%, 20 ml). Group 1 (control group) was given propofol alone and 10, 15 and 20 mg of ephedrine was added to propofol in Group 2, 3 and 4, respectively (n=30 for each group). Propofol was loaded at 150 ml/hr using a syringe pump and no response to verbal command was ascertained as the end-point of induction. Vital signs and SpO2 were checked every 1 min during the induction period. RESULTS: In group 1, there was a significant decrease in both systolic and diastolic pressure prior to intubation. Group 2 and 3 showed relatively stable hemodynamic changes and significant systolic or diastolic changes occured only in the pre or post 1 min periods of intubation. But, in pulse rate, group 3 showed significant change 1 and 2 min after intubation, in contrary to group 2. Group 4 showed significant changes in systolic and diastolic pressure 1 and 2 min after intubation, and in pulse rate throughout the postintubation period. CONCLUSIONS: Ephedrine 10mg may be safely employed to reduce the hemodynamic changes during induction preiod with propofol.