ABSTRACT
Objective To observe the adverse effects of 0.01％ atropine sulfate eye drops on myopic children.Methods A prospective non-randomized controlled trial was conducted.Ninety-nine myopic children (99 right eyes) were randomly assigned to experimental group(55 cases) and control group(44 cases).Myopic children of experimental group wore completely corrected frame glasses,while 0.01％ atropine sulfate eye drop was dropped into each eye once a day before going to bed.Myopic children in control group only wore completely corrected frame glasses.The follow-up time was 4 months.Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA),intraocular pressure (IOP),change of pupil diameter (PD) and amplitude of accommodation,symptoms of discomfort after medication were observed.This study followed the Helsinki declaration and was approved by Ethic Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University.Informed consent was signed by the parents of each patient.Results No significant differences were found in best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA),best corrected near visual acuity(BCNVA) and IOP between the two groups before and 4 months after treatment (BCDVA:Fgroup =3.880,P =0.112;Ftime =27.220,P =0.413;BCNVA:Fgroup =5.200,P =0.311;Ftime =38.200,P =0.116,IOP:Fgroup =12.350,P=0.214;Ftime =22.300,P =0.146).After 4 months treatment,the PD was (6.99 ±0.64) mm in the experimental group,which was significantly higher than that before treatment(P＜0.001).The PD of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group after 4 months treatment,and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.01).The amplitude of accommodation in the experimental group was 14.01 ±3.98 after 4 months treatment.which was 1.20 D lower than that before treatment,the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.01).The amplitude of accommodation of the experimental group was lower than that of the control group after 4 months treatment,the difference was statistically significant (P ＜ 0.01).Four cases (8％) appeared photophobia symptoms.Two cases and 2 cases appeared photophobia for 1 week or 2 weeks,respectively.However this symptom would relieve after wear sunglasses or sunshade caps in outdoor activities.One case (2％) appeared ocular itching and swelling after 1 month treatment,but disappeared after withdrawal.There were no other uncomfortable symptoms such as near sight blurring.Conclusions In mainland of China,the BCDVA,BCNVA and IOP of myopic children are stable;the PD is dilated and the amplitude of accommodation is decreased slightly after 4 months treatment of 0.01％ atropine,and 10％ children appear photophobia,but do not affect their study and life.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the effect and safety of acupuncture therapy on patients with moderate to severe allergic rhinitis.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A non-randomized controlled design was used to compare between the acupuncture group and the medication group. The acupuncture group received 8-week acupuncture therapy, and the medication group received budesonide nasal spray with cetirizine tablets for 8 weeks. The clinical symptoms and signs were analyzed before treatment, at 4 and 8 weeks after the start of treatment, and at 12 weeks after the end of treatment. Furthermore, the clinical efficacy and safety indicators were compared between the two groups.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>A total of 76 participants consisting of 38 in each of the two groups were enrolled. The scores of each clinical symptom and sign, including sneezing, runny nose, stuffy nose, nasal itching, and turbinate edema, and the total scores decreased over time in both groups (all P<0.05); and no difference was found in the scores between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the effective rates of the acupuncture group at 4 and 8 weeks after the start of treatment as well as at 12-week follow-up compared with those of the medication group (83.3% vs. 91.2%, and 94.4 % vs. 85.3%; and 80.6 % vs. 82.4%, all P>0.05). Experimental items including blood routine, urine routine, aspartate transaminase, alanine aminotransferase, urea nitrogen and creatinine were all in the normal reference ranges during the treatment in the acupuncture group.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Acupuncture therapy has a comparable effect to the medication treatment on patients with moderate to severe allergic rhinitis, and it is safe with no severe adverse effects.</p>
Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Acupuncture Therapy , Rhinitis, Allergic , Therapeutics , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Background The clinical efficacy and safety of mouse nerve growth factor(NGF) for injection have been evaluated by Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ stage of clinical trials.But as a clinical drug,its adverse effects for special population should been further studied.Objective This clinical trial was to observe and assess the safety and tolerability of mouse NGF for injection during the application in juvenile and elder patients with optic nerve damage.Methods A multicenter non-randomized controlled trial for the safety evaluation of mouse NGF injection solution was performed in 100 eye centers in China.This study protocol was approved by the Ethic Committee of each drug research center,and written informed consent was obtained from the subject,legal mandatary and guardian prior to this study.Total 2046 patients who met the included criteria of optical nerve damage were enrolled.The patients were divided into the juvenile group(90 cases,＜ 18 years),youth-middle-age group (1868 cases,1 8-75 years) and older group(88 cases,＞75 years).Mouse NGF(30 μg)was intranuscularly injected once per day for 21 days in all the patients.Systolic and diastolic blood pressure,heart rate,intraocular pressure (lOP),laboratory examinations of blood and urine,blood biochemical indexes were recorded before and after injection.All adverse events were evaluated after administration of drug.Results There were 189 (189/2046,9.23％)dropped out cases,including 184 lost cases after 3 weeks of treatment and 5 withdrew cases from adverse responses of drug,with a shedding rate ＜10％ in each group.Total 1857 individuals finished this trial.No significant differences were found in the IOP,heart rate and blood pressure between before and after admninistration of grug in the juvenile group,youth-middle-age group and older group (P＞0.05).The incidence rate of the adverse response in the juvenile group,youth-middle-age group and older group was 57.78％,68.18％,60.01％ respectively,and the primary local adverse events were pain(48.89％),redness and swelling(59.09％),duration(54.49％),without significant difference in the rate of local adverse events among the three groups(X2 =2.302,P =0.324).The abnormal rates of laboratory results of blood and urine were not significantly different among the three groups(all at P＞0.05).The percentage of impaired fasting glucose was 7.46％,23.73％and 7.79％ in the juvenile group,youth-middle-age group and older group,respectively,and the percentage in the older group was higher than that in the juvenile group and the youth-middle-age group (x2 =8.685,P =0.005 ;x2 =27.720,P =0.000).Conclusions Injection of mouse NGF is well tolerated in juvenile and elder patients over the age of 75 years.
ABSTRACT
Introducción: Los cambios en la práctica médica limitan la disponibilidad de pacientes y han generado escenarios de enseñanza de la medicina cada vez más escasos. Por ello se ha hecho necesario desarrollar métodos multimedia en la educación médica. Materiales y métodos: Se diseñó un ensayo controlado, abierto, no aleatorizado para comparar dos métodos de enseñanza: clase magistral y una herramienta multimedia, dentro del proceso de enseñanza de un módulo de entrevista clínica en estudiantes de pregrado de medicina de una universidad pública y una privada. Resultados: 268 estudiantes, 156 que recibieron clase magistral y 112 que recibieron el material multimedia, participaron en el estudio. El promedio de las calificaciones obtenidas en la evaluación por los estudiantes que usaron el material multimedia fue significativamente más alto que quienes tomaron la clase magistral. Además, aprobar u obtener una calificación igual o mayor a 3,5 fue aproximadamente dos veces mayor en los que usaron la herramienta multimedia que en los que asistieron a clase. Conclusiones: La multimedia es una herramienta útil y eficiente para la enseñanza de la entrevista a estudiantes de medicina...
Introduction: Changes in medical practice have limited the availability of patients and scenarios for medical education, resulting in the need to develop multimedia tools for this purpose. Methods: This is a controlled, open, nonrandomized study comparing two teaching methods: Lecture vs. a multimedia tool, in the process of teaching a clinical interview module to undergraduate medical students from a public and a private universities. Results: 268 students participated in the study, 156 received a standard lecture and 112 multimedia material. The average scores on the examinations of students using the multimedia material were significantly higher than those who took the standard lecture. Approximately twice as many of the students using the multimedia tool obtained a passing score of 3.5 or higher when compared to those who attended the lecture. Conclusions: Multimedia is a useful and efficient tool for teaching the clinical interview to medical students...
Subject(s)
Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic , Education, Medical , MultimediaABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to systematically review non-randomized controlled trials of balneotherapy effects on locomotorium diseases in order to assess their quality and organize the evidence.<br> We searched the databases of PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, JDream ll, and lchushi-Web forpapers published from 1990 to December 2, 2008. Eligible studies were non-randomized controlled trials in which balneotherapy exclusive of underwater exercise was the primary intervention. There was no limitation on the language in which the paper was written.<br> We found only 4 papers (2 in English, 1 in Croatian, and 1 in Japanese) that fulfilled the eligibility criteria. These papers differed in the type of diseases studied, so a meta-analysis could not be applied. Their individual results showed that hot springs treatment in combination with a comprehensive fitness class was more effective than hot springs treatment alone, and that balneotherapy had therapeutic effects on arthrosis deformans, psoriatic arthritis, and lumbago. However, it was difficult to accurately interpret the effects because these papers were deficient in providing descriptions of important details of the studies.<br> To improve the quality of future investigations performed with non-randomized controlled trials, we suggest that investigators design a study based on various checklists, implement interventions, conduct evaluations, finally write papers summarizing their findings.