Radiografías periapicales y panorámicas como herramientas para la predicción temprana de osteoporosis / Periapical and panoramic radiographs as tools for early prediction of osteoporosis

Introducción: La osteoporosis es una enfermedad del sistema esquelético provocada por una disminución progresiva de la densidad mineral ósea y el deterioro de la microarquitectura, que aumenta el riesgo de fracturas. Por tanto, se hace necesario adoptar medidas de diagnóstico que permitan la detección temprana de alteraciones de la densidad mineral. Dado que las radiografías dentales son rutinarias y permiten examinar las estructuras óseas de los maxilares, se han propuesto como herramientas primarias de diagnóstico de osteoporosis. Objetivo: Examinar la viabilidad y el avance del uso de radiografías periapicales y panorámicas como predictoras tempranas de osteoporosis. Comentarios principales: Fue realizada una revisión bibliográfica sobre cómo las radiografías periapicales y panorámicas, junto con técnicas de aprendizaje automático e índices morfométricos, pueden ser predictores tempranos de osteoporosis. Consideraciones globales: Radiografías panorámicas y periapicales pueden ayudar en la predicción precoz de osteoporosis. Para ello el odontólogo debe contar con amplia experiencia en la interpretación de imágenes radiográficas o ser especialista en radiología oral o cirugía maxilofacial. Por otro lado, existen herramientas computacionales fundamentadas en aprendizaje automático que han mostrado resultados de identificación de osteoporosis comparables a los arrojados por radiólogos. Estas herramientas pueden servir de apoyo a profesionales menos experimentados. Los odontólogos están llamados a ser los primeros inspectores de cambios anómalos en la densidad ósea. Deben remitir oportunamente los pacientes con sospecha de osteoporosis al médico especialista(AU)

Introduction: Osteoporosis is a disease of the skeletal system caused by a gradual reduction in bone mineral density and deterioration of the microarchitecture, raising the risk of fracture. It is therefore necessary to implement diagnostic actions allowing early detection of mineral density alterations. Given the fact that dental radiographs are routine practice and make it possible to examine the bone structure of maxillae and mandibles, they have been proposed as primary tools for osteoporosis diagnosis. Objective: Examine the viability of and progress in the use of periapical and panoramic radiographs as early predictors of osteoporosis. Main remarks: A review was conducted about the combined use of panoramic and periapical radiographs. Both are machine learning techniques and morphometric indices. General considerations: Panoramic and periapical radiographs may be useful for early prediction of osteoporosis. To achieve this end, dentists should have broad experience interpreting radiographic images or be specialists in oral radiology or maxillofacial surgery. On the other hand, computer tools based on machine learning are available which have obtained results in osteoporosis identification comparable to those obtained by radiologists. Those tools may support the work of less experienced professionals. Dentists should be the first to detect anomalous bone density changes, timely referring patients suspected of osteoporosis to the corresponding specialist(AU)

Retrospective Assessment of Apicectomy Performed in a Known Population: An Institutional Based Study

Background: Apical surgery or Apicectomy is often a lastresort to surgically maintain a tooth with a periapical lesion thatcannot be managed with conventional endodontic treatment.The present study was conducted to assess retrospectivelycases of apicectomy performed in a known population.Materials and Methods: This retrospective study wasconducted to assess the patients treated with apicectomy overthe time of 6 months. Preoperative periapical radiograph wastaken using a parallel technique. Local anesthesia wasadministered and followed by flap elevation.Surgical curette was used to enucleate the pathologic tissueand identify the root apex with/without prior osteotomy. Theapical 3 mm of the root was resected perpendicularly to thelong axis of the tooth with no or minimal bevel. Flaps wererepositioned and sutured. Periapical radiograph was takenafter surgery using the parallel technique. Antibioticsand analgesics medication were prescribed. Follow-upappointments were arranged. The data was included whichcomprises of demographic data, preoperative clinicalexamination type. Statistical analysis was performed using theSPSS software version 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).Results: In this retrospective study total 87 cases ofapicectomy was recorded over the period of 6 months in which23(26.43%) were male while remaining 64(73.56%) werefemales. Apicectomy cases were prevalent in age group 31-40years (36.78%). Apicectomy cases were prevalent in maxillarytooth(73.56%).Conclusion: Our study concluded that apicectomy cases wereprevalent in females, in age group of 31-40 years and inposterior tooth.

Role of trabecular bone in visibility of laminadura: A cross‑sectional radiographic study.

Aim: To determine the degree to which trabecular bone contributes to the radiographic visibility of laminadura (LD). Study Design: Human dry mandibles were obtained, and a series of radiographs were acquired in the premolar region. Radiographs taken were: (1) Before removal of any bone, (2) After removal of small amount of cortical bone at the apex of tooth, (3) Removal of trabecular bone, (4) Smoothing of endosteal surface of cortical bone. The radiographs were projected to a panel of six oral radiologists, and they were asked to judge the visibility of LD. Results: Chi‑square analysis revealed a significant radiographic difference between radiographs made initially and after removal of trabecular bone, cortical bone and smoothing the endosteal surface of cortical bone. Conclusion: There was statistically significant difference in the visibility of loss of LD when trabecular bone is lost. LD can be visible only if the endosteal surface of the cortical bone and trabecular bone is intact.

Cone beam computed tomography: A tool for the diagnosis of confusing periapical lesions in conventional radiographs.

We report two cases in which cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was essential for the establishment of the diagnosis of periapical lesions. CBCT allows a three-dimensional assessment of a specific region with no superimposition of structures. Therefore, its use is recommended when radiographic images are not sufficient for the diagnosis.

Comparação de duas técnicas radiográficas para avaliar o nível da crista óssea alveolar de pacientes com doença periodontal / Comparison of two radiographic techniques for assessing the level of alveolar bone crest in patients with periodontal disease

INTRODUÇÃO E OBJETIVO: Por meio de radiografias panorâmica e periapical teve-se o propósito de quantificar e comparar o nível da perda óssea alveolar de cinco pacientes que apresentavam periodontite. MATERIAL E MÉTODOS: Foram realizadas as medidas da junção esmalte-cemento (JEC) até a crista óssea alveolar (COA) nas superfícies mesial e distal dos incisivos superiores e inferiores, primeiros pré-molares inferiores e primeiros molares inferiores. Submeteram-se os dados à análise estatística Anova e ao teste de Tukey, com nível de significância de 5 por cento. RESULTADOS: Quando comparados os valores da média da perda óssea alveolar entre a radiografia panorâmica e a periapical, verificou-se que a panorâmica se apresentava 0,93 mm maior que a média dos valores da radiografia periapical, uma diferença estatisticamente significante (p < 0,01). A distorção ocorreu no grupo dos dentes molares. Os incisivos inferiores e superiores tiveram as menores distorções. Não houve diferença estatística expressiva entre as medidas efetuadas nas superfícies mesial e distal. CONCLUSÃO: O exame periapical pode ser considerado o melhor método radiográfico para avaliar o nível da perda óssea alveolar e, por conseguinte, ajudar no diagnóstico da doença periodontal. Contudo a radiografia panorâmica ainda é um método válido para analisar o nível de perda óssea causada pela doença periodontal, desde que o cirurgião-dentista esteja familiarizado com as limitações e características dessa técnica. Caso ele tenha dúvida, deve complementar o exame com radiografias periapicais.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: To quantify and compare the level of alveolar bone loss on panoramic and periapical radiographs of five (5) patients presenting periodontitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: On the panoramic and periapical radiographs of five patients, the measurements from the cement-enamel junction (CEJ) to the alveolar bone crest (ABC), at the mesial and distal surfaces of the upper and lower incisors, lower first premolars and first molars, were performed. Data were submitted to statistic analysis by Anova and Tukey test, with level of significance set at 5 percent. RESULTS: When the mean values of the alveolar bone loss were compared between panoramic and periapical radiograph, it was verified that the panoramic radiograph measurements were 0.93 mm higher than periapical radiograph values. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01). The highest distortion occurred in the group of molar teeth. The upper and lower incisors presented lower distortions. It was not found significant statistically differences between the measurements at the mesial and distal surfaces. CONCLUSION: Periapical radiograph can be considered the best radiographic method to evaluate the alveolar bone loss level and, consequently, to help the diagnosis of the periodontal disease. However, the panoramic radiograph is still a valid method for evaluating the level of bone loss caused by the periodontal disease, although the dentist should be aware of the limitation and characteristics of this radiographic technique. When in doubt, radiographic examination should be completed by periapical radiographic.

The accuracy of the radiographic method in root canal length measurement / 대한구강악안면방사선학회지

For the successful endodontic treatment, root canal should be cleaned thoroughly by accurate mechanical and chemical canal preparation and sealed completely with canal filling material without damaging the periapical tissues. The accuracy of the root canal length measurement is a prerequisite for the success of the endodontic treatment, and the root canal length is often determined by the standard periapical radiographs and digital tactile sense. In this study, the accuracy and the clinical usefulness of Digora(R), an intraoral digital imaging processor and the conventional standard radiographs were compared by measuring the length from the top of the file to the root apex. 30 single rooted premolars were invested in a uniformly sized blocks and No.25 K-file was inserted into and fixed in each canal. Each block was placed in equal distance and position to satisfy the principle of the bisecting angle and paralleling techniques and Digora(R) system's image and standard periapical radiographs were taken. Each radiograph was examined by 3 different observers by measuring the length from top of the file to the root apex and each data was compared and analyzed. The results were as follows; 1. In the bisecting angle technique, the average difference between the Digora(R) system and standard periapical radiograph was 0.002 mmand the standard deviation was 0.341 mmwhich showed no statistically significant difference between the two systems(p>0.05). Also, in the paralleling technique, the average difference between these two system was 0.007 mmand the standard deviation was 0.323 mmwhich showed no statistically significant difference between the two systems(p>0.05). 2. In Digora(R) system, the average difference between the bisecting angle and paralleling technique was -0.336 mmand the standard deviation was 0.472 mmwhich showed a statistically significant difference between the two techniques(p 3. In Digora(R) system and the standard periapical radiographs, there was a statistically significant difference between the measurement using the bisecting angle technique and the actual length(p0.05). In conclusion, the determination of the root canal length by using the Digora(R) system can give us as good an image as the standard periapical radiograph and using the paralleling technique instead of the bisecting angle technique can give a measurement closer to the actual canal length, thereby contributing to a successful result. Also, considering the advantages of the digital imaging processor such as decreasing the amount of exposure to the patient, immediate use of the image, magnification of image size, control of the contrast and brightness and the ability of storing the image can give us good reason to replace the standard periapical radiographs.