Late Hepatic Venous Outflow Obstruction Following Inferior Vena Cava Stenting in Patient with Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation Using Modified Piggyback Technique / 대한이식학회지

Following liver transplantation, a few reports have documented hepatic venous outflow obstruction (HVOO) after inferior vena cava (IVC) stenting for the treatment of IVC stenosis. However, HVOO occurred early after IVC stenting and was mostly associated with living donor liver transplantation. Here, we report a case of HVOO that occurred 31 months after IVC stenting in a man who received deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) using a modified piggyback (PB) technique. The cause of HVOO was unclear, but one possible explanation is that the balloon-expandable IVC stent might have compressed the IVC chamber on the donor liver side, which would have changed the outflow hemodynamics, resulting in intimal hyperplasia. Therefore, simultaneous hepatic venous stenting with IVC stent placement could help prevent HVOO in patients receiving DDLT with the modified PB technique.

Does the Venovenous Bypass influence Coagulation Status in Living-Related Liver Transplantation? / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGORUND: Venovenous bypass (VVB) in liver transplantation has been used to decrease the acute hemodynamic and metabolic changes during anhepatic periods. But, the use of VVB in patients undergoing liver transplantation is still under debate concerning its relative risks and benefits. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the influences of VVB on the coagulation status and the amount of transfusion in living-related liver transplantation. METHODS: We conducted this retrospective study on 39 patients who underwent orthotopic living-related liver transplantation using the piggyback technique from March 2001 to April 2002. While 19 patients did not receive venovenous bypass, 20 patients received. We compared the two groups in terms of coagulation-related parameters (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, platelet count, fibrinogen and thromboelastograph), the amount of transfusion during intraoperative and post-operative 1day. We also compared the incidences of post-reperfusion syndrome in the two groups. RESULTS: The group that underwent living-related liver transplantation with VVB required more packed red blood cell (p-RBC) transfusion than the other group without VVB from post-reperfusion untill the end of operation (P<0.05). This difference in the amount of p-RBC transfusion may be due to the blood remained in the VVB circuit at the termination of VVB. However, the two groups were similar in terms of coagulation-related parameters, the amount of other blood components, such as fresh frozen plasma, platelet concentrates, cryoprecipitate, total amount of transfusion during the 24 hours post- operatively, and the incidence of post-reperfusion syndrome. CONCLUSiONS: We conclude that the using of venovenous bypass in living-related liver transplantation did not influence coagulation status and the amount of transfusion perioperatively.