ABSTRACT
Objective T o investigate the relationship betw een the expression of secreted frizzled-related protein 5 (SFR P5) m RNA and the tim e interval after skeletal m uscle injury in rats by real-tim e PC R . Methods A total of ninety SD rats w ere random ly divided into the contusion groups at different tim es including 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, 16 h, 20 h, 24 h, 28 h, 32 h, 36 h, 40 h, 44 h, 48 h after contusion, incision groups at different tim es including 4h and 8h after incision and the control group. T he sam ples w ere taken from the contused zone at different tim e points. T he total RNA w as isolated from the sam ples and re-versely transcribed to analyze the expression levels of SFRP5 m RNA . Results C om pared to the control group, the expression of SFRP5 m RNA in contusion groups w ere dow n-regulated w ithin 48 h after con-tusion and reached the low est level at 20 h, and the expression of SFRP5 m RNA gradually increased from 20 h to 48 h after contusion. T he expression of SFRP5 m RNA in the incised groups w ere signifi-cantly low er than that of the contusion groups at 4 h after injury. A t the tim e of 8 h, the expression levels betw een the contusion and incision groups show ed no statistically significant difference. Conclusion It is suggested that SFRP5 m RNA analysis m ay show regular expression and can be a m arker for estim ation of skeletal m uscle injury age.
ABSTRACT
Objective To com pare and explore the application value of diatom nitric acid digestion method and plankton 16S rDNA PCR method for drow ning identification. Methods Forty drow ning cases from 2010 to 2011 were collected from Department of Forensic Medicine of Wenzhou Medical University. Sam ples including lung, kidney, liver and field water fromeach case were tested with diatom nitric acid digestion method and plankton 16S rDNAPCR method, respectively. The Diatom nitric acid digestion method and plankton 16S rDNAPCR method required 20 gand 2g of each organ,and 15 mL and 1.5 mL of field water, respectively. The inspection time and detection rate were com pared between the two methods. Results Diatom nitric acid digestion method m ainly detected two species of diatom s, Centriae and Pennatae, while plankton 16S rDNA PCR method am plified a length of 162 bp band. The average inspection time of each case of the Diatom nitric acid digestion method was (95.30±2.78) min less than (325.33±14.18)min of plankton 16S rDNA PCR method (P<0.05).The detection rates of two methods for field water and lung were both 100% . For liver and kidney, the detection rate of plankton 16S rDNA PCR method was both 80% , higher than 40% and 30% of diatom nitric acid digestion method (P<0.05), respectively. Conclusion The laboratory testing method needs to be appropriately selected according to the specific circum stances in the forensic appraisal of drow ning. Com pared with diatom nitric acid digestion method, plankton 16S rDNA PCR method has practice values with such advantages as less quantity of sam ples, huge inform ation and high specificity.