ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the effect of rotational errors (antero-posterior) on dosimetric parameters of positive lymph nodes in the long target volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan for advanced cervical cancer and investigate its coping strategies.Methods:Clinical data of patients with cervical cancer complicated with para-aortic or inguinal lymph node metastasis admitted to Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College were randomly selected and retrospectively analyzed. The target areas of the lymph nodes at different distances from the center of the plan were outlined according to the requirements. After designing the VMAT plan on the CT images of each case, the rotational errors (antero-posterior) were introduced by changing the parameters of the treatment couch, and the dose distribution was reconstructed by dose calculation with other parameters unchanged. Then, the external boundary of the original lymph node target was added according to d=2πr(α/360) ( r is the distance from the center of the lymph node to the plan center), re-planned, and the changes of dosimetric parameters in the target area of the original lymph node were analyzed after the corresponding rotational errors were introduced. Results:When the distance between the lymph node target area and the plan center was 6 cm with an error of 3°, the distance was 9 cm and 12 cm with an error of 2.5°, the distance was 15 cm with an error of 2°, and the distance was 18 cm with an error of 1.5°, the mean change of D 95% was more than 5%. When the rotational errors were ≤1°, the mean change of D 95% in lymph node target area was less than 5%, and when the lymph node was 18 cm away from the treatment plan center, the mean change was more than 3%, reaching 3.75%. When the rotational errors were 0.5° and the distance from the plan center was 18 cm (0.5°, 18 cm), the dose change of lymph node target was more than 5%, reaching 5.58%. At (1°, 15 cm), the V 100% change reached 8.96%, and at (1°, 18 cm), the V 100% change was 14.5%. The D 95% and V 100% parameters of the original lymph node target were changed by less than 1% after adding the external boundary of the original lymph node target and introducing corresponding rotational errors. Conclusions:In the long target area radiotherapy of cervical cancer, the variation of dosimetric parameters of lymph node target was increased with the increase of rotational errors and with the increase of distance from the plan center. It is recommended to increase the efferent boundary of lymph nodes in different positions to avoid underdose by d=2πr(α/360).
ABSTRACT
Objective:To analyse the correlation between the lymph nodes, the number of positive lymph nodes, the positive rate of lymph nodes and the long-term prognosis of patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma.Methods:The clinical data and follow-up results of 104 patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma admitted to Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University from January 2015 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed using a retrospective cohort study. All patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. According to the nature of the patients′ lymph nodes, the number of positive lymph nodes, and the positive rate of lymph nodes, the X-tile software was used to analyze data respectively, and the critical value of SUVmax were determined, and the patients were divided into low-risk group and high-risk group by critical values. Based on this critical value, the patients were divided into low-risk groups and high-risk groups. There were 37 patients in the lymph node positive group and 67 patients in the negative group. In the lymph node positive group, according to the number of positive lymph nodes (the cut-off value=2), they were divided into the low-risk group( n=14), the high-risk group( n=23); grouped according to the lymph node positive rate (the cut off=0.13), and divided into the low-risk group( n=15), and the high-risk group( n=22). After grouping according to different lymph node parameters, the preoperative general data such as age, gender, laboratory examination, etc., the correlation between perioperative complications and long-term prognosis were analyzed. The measurement data conforming to the normal distribution was expressed as mean ± standard deviation( ± s), and the t test was used for comparison between groups; the measurement data that was not normally distributed was expressed as M ( Q1, Q3), and the comparison between groups was performed by the rank sum test. The enumeration data were expressed by the number of cases, and the comparison between groups was performed using the chi-square test. If the total number of cases was less than 50, and Fisher′s exact test was used. The optimal cut-off values for different lymph node parameters were determined using the x-tile 3.6.1 software. Survival curves were calculated and drawn using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the survival rates were compared using the Log-rank test. Results:All patients successfully underwent the operation, 5 patients(4.8%) died during the perioperative period. The median postoperative survival time of lymph node-positive patients and lymph node-negative patients was 17 months and 36 months, respectively, and the overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 64.9%, 23.9%, 23.9%, and 81.5%, 49.8%, 41.7%( P=0.003). Among the patients grouped according to the number of positive lymph nodes, the median postoperative survival time of patients in the low-risk group and the high-risk group was 21 months and 17 months, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of the two groups were were 77.1%, 42.9%, 42.9% and 58.2%, 13.8%, 13.8%( P=0.284), respectively. Among the patients grouped according to the positive rate of lymph nodes, the median postoperative survival time of the patients in the low-risk group and the high-risk group was 30 months and 15 months, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of the two groups were 85.6%, 42.7%, 42.7% and 51.3%, 10.3%, 0.3%( P=0.020), respectively. Conclusions:Radical pancreaticoduodenectomy is the standard procedure for patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma. The prognosis of patients with positive lymph nodes is worse. For patients with positive lymph nodes, the positive rate of lymph nodes is a better predictor of the long-term prognosis compared with the number of positive lymph nodes.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE@#To investigate the value of positive lymph node ratio (LNR) in predicting the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer.@*METHODS@#We retrieved the data of a total of 862 patients with esophageal cancer with complete clinical pathology data archived in SEER database in 2010 to 2015. The best cutoff point of LNR was selected using X-tile software. Univariate and multivariate COX proportional hazard models were used to assess the value of LNR in predicting the prognosis of patients after propensity score matching (PSM).@*RESULTS@#The best cut-off point of LNR determined using X-tile 3.6.1 software was 0.16. The patients with LNR < 0.16 and those with LNR≥0.16 showed significant differences in the number of positive lymph nodes, pathological type, T stage and M stage. After 1:1 propensity score matching, the two groups showed no significant difference in the clinical data or pathological parameters. Matched univariate and multivariate COX regression analyses showed that LNR, primary tumor site and M staging were all independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients, and among them LNR had the most significant predictive value (LNR < 0.16 LNR≥0.16: HR=1.827, 95% : 1.140-2.929; =0.000). The median survival time of patients with LNR < 0.16 was 31 months (95%: 22.556-39.444 months), as compared with 16 months (95%: 12.989-19.011) in patient with LNR≥0.16 (Log Rank χ=27.392, < 0.0001). LNR had a better accuracy than N stage for assessing the patients' prognosis with an area under the ROC curve of 0.617 (95%: 0.567-0.666), as compared with 0.515 (95%: 0.463-0.565) of N stage (=3.008, =0.0026).@*CONCLUSIONS@#LNR≥0.16 is an independent risk factor affecting the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer and has better prognostic value than N stage.
Subject(s)
Humans , Esophageal Neoplasms , Lymph Node Excision , Lymph Node Ratio , Lymph Nodes , Lymphatic Metastasis , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Objective@#To analyze the failure patterns of locoregional recurrence (LRR) and investigate the range of radiotherapy in T1-2N1 breast cancer patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy.@*Methods@#From September 1997 to April 2015, 2472 women with T1-2N1 breast cancer after modified radical mastectomy without neoadjuvant systemic therapy were treated in our hospital. 1898 patients who did not undergo adjuvant radiotherapy were included in this study. The distribution of accumulated LRR was analyzed. The LR and RR rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the prognostic factors were identified in univariate analyses with Log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox logistic regression analysis.@*Results@#With a median follow-up of 71.3 months (range 1.1-194.6), 164 patients had LRR, including supraclavicular/infraclavicular lymph nodes in 106(65%), chest wall in 69(42%), axilla in 39(24%) and internal mammary lymph nodes (IMNs) in 19 patients (12%). In multivariate analysis, age (>45 years vs.≤45 years), tumor location (other quadrants vs. inner quadrant), T stage (T1 vs. T2), the number of positive axillary lymph nodes (1 vs. 2-3), hormone receptor status (positive vs. negative) were significant prognostic factors for both LR and RR.@*Conclusions@#In patients with T1-2N1 breast cancer after modified radical mastectomy, the most common LRR site is supraclavicular/infraclavicular nodal region, followed by chest wall. The axillary or IMN recurrence is rare. The prognostic factors for LR and RR are similar, which indicates that supraclavicular/infraclavicular and chest wall irradiation should be considered for postmastectomy radiotherapy.
ABSTRACT
Objective To analyze the failure patterns of locoregional recurrence (LRR) and investigate the range of radiotherapy in T1-2N1 breast cancer patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy.Methods From September 1997 to April 2015,2472 women with T1-2N1 breast cancer after modified radical mastectomy without neoadjuvant systemic therapy were treated in our hospital.1898 patients who did not undergo adjuvant radiotherapy were included in this study.The distribution of accumulated LRR was analyzed.The LR and RR rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method,and the prognostic factors were identified in univariate analyses with Log-rank test.Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox logistic regression analysis.Results With a median follow-up of 71.3 months (range 1.1-194.6),164 patients had LRR,including supraclavicular/infraclavicular lymph nodes in 106(65％),chest wall in 69(42％),axilla in 39(24％) and internal mammary lymph nodes (IMNs) in 19 patients (12％).In multivariate analysis,age (＞45 years vs.≤45 years),tumor location (other quadrants vs.inner quadrant),T stage (T1 vs.T2),the number of positive axillary lymph nodes (1 vs.2-3),hormone receptor status (positive vs.negative) were significant prognostic factors for both LR and RR.Conclusions In patients with T1-2N1 breast cancer after modified radical mastectomy,the most common LRR site is supraclavicular/infraclavicular nodal region,followed by chest wall.The axillary or IMN recurrence is rare.The prognostic factors for LR and RR are similar,which indicates that supraclavicular/infraclavicular and chest wall irradiation should be considered for postmastectomy radiotherapy.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the application value of the anatomical location of positive nodes (N staging) from TNM staging systems published by American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) (7th edition),number of metastatic lymph nodes (NMLN),lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of metastatic lymph nodes (LODDS) as prognostic predictors in advanced gallbladder carcinoma(GBC).Methods The retrospective crosssectional study was conducted.The clinicopathological data of 176 patients who underwent radical resection of advanced GBC in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University between January 2008 and December 2014 were collected.According to preoperative assessment,intraoperative exploration and frozen section biopsy,staging and surgical procedure were confirmed.Observation indicators and evaluation criteria:(1) surgical and postoperative situations;(2) follow-up and survival situations;(3) N staging related indicators based on TNM staging systems of AJCC (7th edition):LNR =NMLN / total number of lymph node dissection,LODDS =Log (NMLN+0.5) / (total number of lymph node dissection-NMLN+0.5);(4) lymph node staging based on NMLN,LNR and LODDS:LODDS ＜-1.0 as LODDS 1 staging,-1.0 ≤ LODDS ＜ 0 as LODDS 2 staging,LODDS ≥0 as LODDS 3 staging;(5) prognostic comparisons of patients with different lymph node staging;(6) accuracy of 4 different types of lymph node staging predicting the prognosis of patients.Follow-up using outpatient examination and telephone interview was performed to detect postoperative survival up to December 31,2017.Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as x-±s.Measurement data with skewed distribution were described as M (range),and comparisons were done using the nonparametric test.The survival rate was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method,and the Log-rank test was used for survival comparison.Correlation analysis was done using the Spearman correlation analysis,r ≥ 0.800 as a high correlation,0.500 ≤ r ＜ 0.800 as a moderate correlation and 0.300 ≤ r ＜ 0.500 as a low correlation.The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) were respectively drawn and calculated based on 4 kinds of binary logistic regression model.Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Harrell concordance index (Harrell c-index) were respectively calculated based on 4 kinds of COX proportional hazard regression model.The larger values of AUC and Harrell c-index caused a smaller value of AIC,but a lymph node staging standard correlated with greater prognostic accuracy.Harrell c-index ＜ 0.50 was no prediction,and 0.50 ≤ Harrell c-index ≤ 1.00 was an obvious prediction.Results (1) Surgical and postoperative situations:176 patients underwent successful radical resection of GBC,including 161 in R0 resection and 15 in R1 resection,99 with D1 lymph node dissection and 77 with D2 lymph node dissection.Of 176 patients,9 with postoperative complications were improved by symptomatic treatment,including 6 with bile leakage,2 with hepatic dysfunction and 1 with intra-abdominal hemorrhage.Results of postoperative pathological examination:total number of lymph node dissection,NMLN and LNR were respectively 6.7±4.4,0 (range,0-12.0) and 0 (range,0-1.00);high-differentiated,moderate-differentiated and low-differentiated tumors were respectively detected in 16,81 and 79 patients;162 and 14 patients were in T3 and T4 stages;60 patients were combined with infiltration of the liver.(2) Follow-up and survival situations:176 patients were followed up for l-118 months,with a median time of 33 months.The 1-,3-and 5-year overall survival rates were respectively 63.1％,42.0％ and 32.0％.(3) N staging related indicators based on TNM staging systems ofAJCC (7th edition):95,45 and 36 patients were respectively detected in staging N0,N1 and N2.NMLN,LNR and LODDS were respectively 2.0 (range,1.0-7.0),0.40 (range,0.08-1.00),-0.15 (range,-0.99-1.04) in staging N1 and 4.0 (range,1.0-12.0),0.57 (range,0.13-1.00),0.11 (range,-0.70-1.04) in staging N2,with a statistically significant difference in NMLN (Z=-3.888,P＜0.05) and with no statistically significant difference in LNR and LODDS (Z=-1.492,-1.689,P＞0.05).(4) Lymph node staging based on NMLN,LNR and LODDS:NMLN and LNR as a cut-off point were respectively 4.0 and 0.70,NMLN 1 staging (NMLN=0) was detected in 95 patients,NMLN 2 staging (1.0 ≤ NMLN ≤ 4.0) in 61 patients and NMLN 3 staging (NMLN＞4.0) in 20 patients;LNR 1 staging (LNR=0) was detected in 95 patients,LNR 2 staging (0 ＜ LNR ≤ 0.70) in 58 patients and LNR 3 staging (LNR＞0.70) in 23 patients.LODDS 1,2 and 3 stagings was detected in 61,70 and 45 patients,respectively.The lymph node staging based on NMLN and LNR was significantly correlated with based on N staging of TNM staging systems of AJCC (7th edition) (r =0.949,0.922,P＜0.05);the lymph node staging based on LODDS was moderately correlated with based on N staging of TNM staging systems of AJCC (7th edition) (r =0.758,P＜ 0.05).(5) Prognostic comparisons of patients with different lymph node staging:1-,3-and 5-year overall survival rates were respectively 86.3％,65.3％,52.2％ in N0 staging patients and 44.4％,22.2％,13.3％ in N1 staging patients and 25.0％,5.6％,2.8％ in N2 staging patients,with a statistically significant difference (x2=88.895,P＜0.05).The 1-,3-and 5-year overall survival rates were respectively 86.3％,65.3％,52.2％ in NMLN 1 staging patients and 47.5％,19.7％,11.1％ in NMLN 2 staging patients and 0,0,0 in NMLN 3 staging patients,with a statistically significant difference (x2=121.086,P＜0.05).The 1-,3-and 5-year overall survival rates were respectively 86.3％,65.3％,52.2％ in LNR 1 staging patients and 41.4％,17.2％,11.8％ in LNR 2 staging patients and 17.4％,8.7％,0 in LNR 3 staging patients,with a statistically significant difference (x2 =86.503,P＜ 0.05).The 1-,3-and 5-year overall survival rates were respectively 85.2％,65.5％,51.8％ in LODDS 1 staging patients and 65.7％,40.0％,31.3％ in LODDS 2 staging patients and 28.9％,13.3％,5.9％ in LODDS 3 staging patients,with a statistically significant difference (x2=59.195,P＜0.05).(6) Accuracy of 4 different types of lymph node staging predicting the prognosis of patients:according to N staging of TNM staging systems of AJCC (7th edition),NMLN,LNR and LODDS,AUC,AIC and Harrell c-index of lymph node staging were respectively 0.878,0.881,0.870,0.864 and 1 047.5,1 026.4,1 044.2,1 063.6 and 0.77,0.78,0.77,0.76.AIC value was smaller with increased values of AUC and Harrell c-index based on NMLN,showing a greatest accuracy predicting the prognosis of patients.Conclusion Among N staging of TNM staging system of AJCC (7 edition),NMLN,LNR and LODDS as prognostic predictors,NMLN can more precisely predict radical resection of advanced GBC.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the prognostic efficacy of the number and location of positive lymph nodes (LN), LN ratio (LNR), and log odds of positive LNs (LODDs) in high-risk cervical cancer treated with radical surgery and adjuvant treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty high-risk patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic node dissection followed by adjuvant treatment were analyzed retrospectively. The patients had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IA2-IIB. Upper LN is defined as common iliac or higher LN, and LNR is the ratio of positive LNs to harvested LNs. LODDs is log odds between positive LNs and negative LNs. Radiotherapy was delivered to the whole pelvis with median 50.4 Gy/28 Fx± to the para-aortic regions. Platinum-based chemotherapy was used in most patients (93%). The median follow-up duration was 80 months. RESULTS: The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 76.1%, and the overall survival (OS) rate was 86.4%. Treatment failure occurred in 11 patients, and distant failure (DF) was the dominant pattern (90.9%). In univariate analysis, significantly lower DFSwas observed in patients with perineural invasion, ≥ 2 LN metastases, LNR ≥ 10%, upper LN metastasis, and ≥ -1.05 LODDs. In multivariate analysis, ≥ -1.05 LODDs was the only significant factor for DFS (p=0.011). Of patients with LODDs ≥ -1.05, 40.9% experienced DF. LODDs was the only significant prognostic factor for OS as well (p=0.006). CONCLUSION: LODDs ≥ -1.05 was the only significant prognostic factor for both DFS and OS. In patients with LODDs ≥ -1.05, intensified chemotherapy might be required, considering the high rate of DF.
Subject(s)
Humans , Disease-Free Survival , Drug Therapy , Follow-Up Studies , Gynecology , Hysterectomy , Lymph Nodes , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasm Metastasis , Obstetrics , Pelvis , Prognosis , Radiotherapy , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Failure , Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate whether Stage IIIC (TanyN3M0) breast cancer can be classified further into subgroups with different prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty‑two patients with Stage IIIC breast cancer at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital were analyzed. The disease‑free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated by Kaplan–Meier method for lymph node ratio (LNR) and the number of positive lymph node (PLN). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cut‑off value of the LNR and PLN. The univariate and multivariate analysis were applied to identify the prognostic factors. RESULTS: The results showed that the optimal cut‑off value of LNR value was 0.65, and the optimal cut‑off value of PLN was 15. The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed the higher value of LNR or PLN was correlated with shortened DFS (P = 0.002, P = 0.008, respectively) and OS (P < 0.001, P = 0.001, respectively). In multivariate survival analysis, the value of LNR and PLN were still remained as independent prognostic factors for DFS (P = 0.014, P = 0.013, respectively) and OS (P = 0.004, P = 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the value of LNR or PLN could be used as a new significant prognostic biomarker for Stage IIIC breast cancer patients. Stage IIIC breast cancer patients with lower value of LNR or PLN may be down staged.