Proposed Methods for Real-Time Measurement of Posterior Condylar Angle during TKA

PURPOSE: Conventional instruments are known to result in high numbers of outliers in restoring femoral component rotation primarily due to fixed degree of external rotation resection relative to the posterior condylar line (PCL). Outliers can be reduced by determining the patient specific posterior condylar angle (PCA) preoperatively or intraoperatively. There is a paucity of methods that can be used during surgery for determining the PCA. We propose two simple, real-time methods to determine the PCA and hence to measure the axial anatomical variation during surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted using axial computed tomography (CT) scans of the knees of 26 patients. The commercial software K-PACS and our proposed two methods (trigonometric and protractor) were used to measure the angle between the transepicondylar axis and PCL, i.e., PCA. Statistical comparison between the mean angles obtained by K-PACS and our methods were done. RESULTS: The three methods resulted in similar PCAs. The mean PCA measured by the three methods were similar. The mean PCA value measured by the K-PACS, trigonometric method and protractor method was 6.27degrees (range, 0degrees to 12degrees), 6.23degrees (range, 0degrees to 11.11degrees) and 6.31degrees (range, 0degrees to 12degrees), respectively. There were significant correlations between the K-PACS measured PCA and trigonometrically or protractor measured PCA. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel, simple, easily reproducible, real-time and radiation-free PCA measurement methods obviate the need for preoperative CT scan for identification of patient specific PCA.

Distal Femoral Rotational Alignment Based on Mechanical Axis of the Femur: A 3-Dimensional Computed Tomographic Scan in Vivo Assessment / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: To measure and to analyze the relationships among the rotational axes of the distal femoral region by means of 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomographic (CT) images taken perpendicularly to the mechanical axis and a 3D rendering program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty cases involving the lower extremity were included in this study, which used 3D computed tomographic angiograms. CT images of the perpendicular cross-sections to the mechanical axis of the femur were obtained by processing 3D recombinant images using Aquaris NET(R). The following anatomical angles were obtained from axial imaging using the 3D reconstructed bone model: transepicondylar axis, surgical transepicondylar axis, anteroposterior axis, and real posterior condylar axis. RESULTS: In the tomographic images, the angles to the real posterior condylar axis formed by the anatomical femoral transepicondylar axis, the anatomical femoral transepicondylar axis, and the anteroposterior axis were 6.34+/-1.23degrees, 2.43+/-1.56degrees, and 96.52+/-1.77degrees, respectively. The angles to the anatomical femoral transepicondylar axis formed by the anteroposterior axis and the surgical femoral transepicondylar axis were 90.19+/-1.61degrees and 3.91+/-0.90degrees, respectively. In the recombinant 3D femur model, the angles to the real posterior condylar axis formed by the anatomical femoral transepicondylar axis and the anteroposterior axis were 6.29+/-1.86degrees, and 93.33+/-3.76degrees, respectively. And, the angle for anteroposterior axis from anatomical transepicondylar axis was 87.04+/-4.11degrees. CONCLUSION: The method of measuring the rotational axes of the distal femur using the CT image taken perpendicularly to the mechanical axis is considered reproducible. In particular, the measurement method using the anatomical transepicondylar axis is more accurate than that using the anteroposterior axis.