ABSTRACT
Abstract Background and aims: Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers (P-CABs) have been used in Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapies in recent years. However, the efficacy and safety of P-CABs compared to ProtonPump Inhibitors (PPIs) in this setting remain controversial. Methods: The efficacy and safety of P-CABs and PPIs for H. pylori eradication were compared in a meta-analysis based on a systematic literature search of major electronic databases for relevant Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs). Results: Seven studies and 1,168 patients were included. The pooled eradication rate determined by Intention-ToTreat (ITT) analysis was 90.2% for P-CAB-based and 75.5% for PPI-based triple therapy (pooled RR [95% CI] = 1.17 [1.08-1.28], p < 0.001). The Per-Protocol (PP) analysis also demonstrated significant superiority of P-CABs (pooled eradication rate = 92.4% vs. 77.8%; pooled RR [95% CI] = 1.14 [1.03-1.26], p < 0.01). In a subgroup evaluation, P-CABs were significantly better than PPIs as a first-line eradication therapy, in both the ITT analysis (pooled eradication rate = 91.8% vs. 76.4%; pooled RR [95% CI] = 1.18 [1.10-1.28], p < 0.0001) and the PP analysis (pooled eradication rate = 93.0% vs. 78.6%; pooled RR [95% CI] = 1.13 [1.02 -1.26], p < 0.05). However, P-CABs were not superior to PPIs when administered as salvage therapy, as determined in the ITT (75.0% vs. 66.0%, pooled RR [95% CI] = 1.11 [0.69-1.78], p = 0.66) and PP (85.7% vs. 70.0%, pooled RR [95% CI] = 1.20 [0.82-1.75], p = 0.34) analyses. In a subgroup analysis limited to Japanese patients, both the ITT analysis (pooled eradication rate = 89.6% vs. 73.9%; RR [95% CI] = 1.21 [1.14 -1.29], p < 0.01) and the PP analysis (pooled eradication rate = 92.0% vs. 75.7%; RR [95% CI] = 1.18 [1.06 -1.32], p < 0.01) showed that P-CABs were significantly superior compared to PPIs as triple eradication therapy. However, in the subgroup analysis of patients from other countries, there was no significant difference in either the ITT analysis (pooled eradication rate = 93.8% vs. 85.2%; RR [95% CI] = 1.10 [0.99-1.22], p = 0.07) or PP analysis (pooled eradication rate = 95.0% vs. 90.8%; RR [95% CI] = 1.05 [0.98-1.14], p = 0.17). The incidence of adverse events associated with the two regimens did not significantly differ (P-CABs vs. PPIs: 33.6% vs. 40.0%; RR [95% CI] = 0.84 [0.71‒1.00], p = 0.05). The incidence of serious adverse events and dropout rate due to adverse events also did not differ (p = 0.44 and p = 0.67, respectively). Conclusions: The efficacy of P-CAB-based triple therapy is superior to that of PPI-based triple therapy as a first-line approach to H. pylori eradication, particularly in Japanese patients. As salvage therapy, the efficacy of the two treatments did not significantly differ. The tolerability of P-CAB-based and PPI-based triple therapy was comparable, as was the incidence of adverse events. HIGHLIGHTS The efficacy of P-CAB-based triple therapy is superior to that of PPI-based triple therapy as a first-line approach to H. pylori eradication, particularly in Japanese patients. P-CABs were not superior to PPIs as a salvage triple eradication therapy. The safety and tolerability of P-CAB are comparable to PPI in H. pylori triple eradication therapies. Further large RCTs conducted in multiple regions and countries are necessary.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: Endoscopic submucosal dissection is a promising method for the resection of superficial gastric neoplasms. To date, several institutions have used proton pump inhibitor injections over the perioperative period. However, there is very little evidence regarding their efficacy. To overcome this limitation, we compared procedural outcomes and the prevention of adverse events of proton pump inhibitor injection with an orally administered active potassium-competitive acid blocker alone.Participants and Methods: We enrolled a total of 150 patients treated for superficial gastric neoplasms at a single institution between April 2015 and December 2018. Patients treated for 2 days with proton pump inhibitor injections following 12 days of oral potassium-competitive acid blocker (proton pump inhibitor group=80) were compared with patients treated for 14 days orally with potassium-competitive acid blocker alone (potassium-competitive acid blocker group=70) using propensity score analysis. We evaluated intragastric pH levels prior to endoscopic submucosal dissection, frequency of intraoperative major bleeding, procedure time, en bloc resection rate, curability, ulcer reduction rate 14 days after endoscopic submucosal dissection, and adverse events (including perforation and postoperative bleeding).Results: Propensity score analysis yielded 43 matched pairs. The comparison demonstrated similar values for the outcomes. For all cases, we observed intragastric pH levels >6.4 prior to endoscopic submucosal dissection. Postoperative bleeding rates were 2.3% (1/43) in the proton pump inhibitor group and 0.0% (0/43) in the potassium-competitive acid blocker group (P=0.315).Conclusions: Oral potassium-competitive acid blocker alone was as effective as proton pump inhibitor injection, with a low incidence of adverse events. Based on these results, proton pump inhibitor injection might be omitted during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.
ABSTRACT
The first-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection comprises triple therapy with the combination of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), amoxicillin, and clarithromycin. However, the H. pylori eradication rate after PPI-based triple therapy has fallen below 80% in many countries, and even reached 70% in recent Korean studies. The main cause of eradication failure has been attributed to the increased antibiotic resistance of H. pylori. To overcome the limitations of the current eradication therapy, the maintenance of a high gastric pH, which increases the function of the antibiotics, may be a successful strategy. Potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs) inhibit H⁺, K⁺-ATPase in a reversible and K⁺-competitive manner and result in an almost complete inhibition of gastric acid secretion. However, the clinical development of most PCABs has been discontinued owing to their hepatic toxicity or similar efficacy to PPIs. Vonoprazan has a completely different chemical structure and higher pKa value compared with those of other PCABs and produces more potent and sustained acid inhibition. A recent phase III randomized study reported that vonoprazan was highly effective as a component of first-line or second-line triple therapy. In this study, we reviewed the literature regarding the role of PCAB in the eradication of H. pylori.