ABSTRACT
Objective: To study the prescription and process of Fritillariae Thunbergii Bulbus (FTB) formula granules. Methods: FTB was extracted by decocting method. FTB extract powder was prepared by spray drying method. Wet-extruding granulating, extruded-rolling granulating, and one-step granulating were adopted for preparing the formula granules. A comprehensive evaluation method was based on the powder fluidity parameters such as the rest angle, the final volume reduction degree (a), the filling velocity constant (b, k), and the yield of the particles, to optimize the optimum preparation process, prescription excipients and their proportion. An HPLC method was used to determine the contents of peimine and peiminine. The chromatographic column was the Agilent Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18 column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm), and the flow phase was Acetonitrile-water-diethylamine (70:30:0.03); The volume flow was 1.0 mL/min; The column temperature was 30 ℃. Results: The synthesis score of the FTB formula granules prepared by one-step granulating method was the highest. The best prescription was the extract powder-dextrin- 95% ethanol solution (100:100:160). The particle yield was 91.3%, the rest angle was 30.73°, the value of a was 0.109 1, the value of b was 0.025 5 and the value of k was 0.030 1, the fluidity of the granules was good and the yield was high. The content of peimine was 0.305% and the content of peiminine was 0.098% in the particles by HPLC. Conclusion: In this experiment, the formulation and process of FTB formula granules were designed to met the design requirements, which could be used in the production of the technology.
ABSTRACT
The purpose of the work is the comparative evaluation of GalenIQ 721, against known excipients such as Pharmatose M200 and Alfacel type 102. The evaluated parameters included compactibility curves, tablet ejection pressure, disintegration time and flowability of individual powders and mixtures of the excipients and amoxicillin. The surrogate and explicit compactibility of Alfacel 102 (492 N; 7.9 N) is superior, followed by GalenIQ 721 (310 N; 0.93 N) and Pharmatose M200 (203 N; -2.8 N). The lubricity of Alfacel 102 is superior (ejection pressure - Pe=0.590 MPa), followed by GalenIQ 721 (Pe=6.45 MPa) and Pharmatose M200 (Pe=6.51 MPa). Disintegrability of tablets was better by GalenIQ (0.33 s/N), followed by Alfacel 102 (2.48 s/N) and Pharmatose M200 (4.47 s/N).GalenIQ 721 displays a powder fluidity of (14.4 g/s), followed by Alfacel 102 (7.88 g/s) and Pharmatose M200 (0.99 g/s). The tableting functionality of GalenIQ 721 is better than that of Pharmatose M200 but inferior of that of Alfacel 102. Although the GalenIQ 721 characteristics, predominantly brittle, are expected to be more stable to changes in formula composition and process conditions than those of Alfacel 102, plastic behavior.