Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs ; (24): 5882-5888, 2018.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-851486

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate the prognostic factors of castrated resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Methods From December 1, 2015 to November 30, 2017, CRPC patients who met the inclusion criteria were collected from the First Affiliated Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tumor Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, and General Hospital of Tianjin Medical University. The reliability and validity of 18 included factors were analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to screen the prognostic factors of CRPC and draw the survival curve.The significant fators from single factor analysis were included in COX proportional risk model for multiple-factor analysis to determine the independent prognostic factors. Results Hematuria, osteodynia, HGB 5.18 mmol/L, TPSA > 10 ng/mL, f/tPSA > 0.19, deficiency of both qi and blood, and no treatment of combination of traditional Chinese medicine were the risk factors for overall survival (OS) in CRPC patients; CHO > 5.18 mmol/L was the only risk factor for OS in CRPC patients, which was established as risk factors. CHO > 5.18 mmol/L, HGB 5.18 mmol/L is an independent risk factor for OS in CRPC patients.

2.
Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology ; (24): 1066-1070, 2018.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-706884

ABSTRACT

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib hydrochloride capsules for the treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma based on the data from Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor, Peking University Cancer Hospital&Institute. Methods: Patients were randomized allocated at 2:1 ratio for the anlotinib treatment and placebo group. The treatment group received 12 mg/day of anlotinib for 14 consecutive days in a 21-day cycle. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary end-points were disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and adverse event rate. Results: A total of 46 patients were enrolled in this study; 7 of them were excluded from per protocol set (PPS). Among the remaining 39 patients, 28 were included in the anlotinib group and 11 in the placebo group. In the anlotinib group, 4 patients had partial remission and 13 had stable disease (SD), whereas in the placebo group, 3 patients had SD. The difference in DCR between the 2 groups was statistically significant (60.7% vs . 27.3%, P=0.082). The DCR of the advanced soft tissue sarcoma in the anlotinib group was 78.6% (11/14). The median PFS in the anlotinib group was 12.4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.6 to 17.2) months, which was significantly longer than 4 months in the placebo group (95% CI: 1.7 to 6.3 months, P=0.043); however, the difference in OS between the 2 groups was not significant (19.4 vs . 17.6 months, P=0.961). Regarding the safety, 2 patients had severe adverse events (7.14%) possibly related with treatment in the anlotinib group; one of them had pneumothorax. The other adverse events were grade 1 to 2. Conclusions: Soft tissue sarcoma is highly responsive to anlotinib, with prolonged PFS. Anlotinib is well tolerated and can be used as a treatment option for advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL