Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 421
Filter
1.
Rev. gastroenterol. Perú ; 44(1): 41-51, ene.-mar. 2024. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1560048

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN Un adecuado abordaje de la enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico refractaria (rERGE) es imprescindible para lograr el éxito terapéutico. Desde la definición precisa de rERGE hasta la detallada caracterización de sus fenotipos, establecerá el camino hacia la personalización de la terapia óptima para cada paciente. En esta revisión narrativa de la literatura, se busca proporcionar una síntesis actualizada de la utilidad de las diversas herramientas diagnósticas y explorar el amplio espectro de opciones terapéuticas, tanto médicas como invasivas disponibles para esta condición.


ABSTRACT An adequate approach to refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (rGERD) is essential for achieving therapeutic success. From the precise definition of rGERD to the detailed characterization of its phenotypes, it will pave the way for the customization of optimal therapy for each patient. In this narrative literature review, the aim is to provide an updated synthesis of the utility of various diagnostic tools and explore the wide range of therapeutic options, both medical and invasive, available for this condition.

2.
Arq. gastroenterol ; 61: e23153, 2024. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1533820

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely prescribed worldwide, often resulting in their overuse. Consequently, it is essential to identify the likely causes of this overuse to facilitate their appropriate prescription. Objective: This study aims to assess physician prescribing patterns, their knowledge of PPIs, and factors affecting their knowledge. Methods: An online survey was conducted among Latin American and Spanish physicians, collecting the following data: professional information, patterns of PPI usage, familiarity with published evidence, and the management approach in three hypothetical case-scenarios. Participant knowledge was categorized as sufficient or insufficient based on the results of the case scenarios. Subsequently, subgroup analysis was performed based on physician training level, years in practice, specialty, and time since the last PPI literature review. Results: A total of 371 physicians participated in the survey. Thirty-eight percent frequently prescribe PPIs, primarily for prophylactic purposes (57.9%). Eighty percent were unfamiliar with PPI deprescribing strategies, and 54.4% rarely reviewed the ongoing indication of patients taking a PPI. Sixty-four percent demonstrated sufficient knowledge in the case-scenarios. A significant association was observed between specialty type (medical vs surgical: 69.4% vs 46.8%, P<0.001), the timing of the PPI indication literature review (<5 years vs >5 years: 71.4% vs 58.7%, P=0.010), and sufficient knowledge. Conclusion: While most participants prescribed PPIs regularly and for prophylaxis purposes, the majority were unfamiliar with deprescribing strategies and rarely reviewed ongoing indications. Sufficient knowledge is correlated with recent literature reviews and medical specialty affiliation.


RESUMO Contexto: Os inibidores da bomba de prótons (IBPs) são amplamente prescritos em todo o mundo, muitas vezes resultando em seu uso excessivo. Consequentemente, é essencial identificar as prováveis causas desse uso excessivo para facilitar sua prescrição adequada. Objetivo: Este estudo tem como objetivo avaliar o padrão de prescrição dos médicos, seu conhecimento sobre IBPs e fatores que afetam seu conhecimento. Métodos: Uma pesquisa on-line foi conduzida entre médicos latino-americanos e espanhóis, coletando os seguintes dados: informações profissionais, padrões de uso de IBP, familiaridade com evidências publicadas e abordagem de manejo em três casos-cenários hipotéticos. O conhecimento dos participantes foi categorizado em suficiente ou insuficiente com base nos resultados dos cenários de caso. Posteriormente, a análise de subgrupos foi realizada com base no nível de formação do médico, anos de prática, especialidade e tempo desde a última revisão da literatura dos IBPs. Resultados: Um total de 371 médicos participaram da pesquisa. Trinta e oito por cento prescrevem frequentemente IBP, principalmente para fins profiláticos (57,9%). Oitenta por cento não estavam familiarizados com as estratégias de prescrição de IBP, e 54,4% raramente revisaram a indicação contínua de pacientes em uso de IBP. Sessenta e quatro por cento demonstraram conhecimento suficiente nos cenários-caso. Observou-se associação significativa entre o tipo de especialidade (médica vs cirúrgica: 69,4% vs 46,8%, P<0,001), o momento da revisão da literatura de indicação do IBP (<5 anos vs >5 anos: 71,4% vs 58,7%, P=0,010) e conhecimento suficiente. Conclusão: Embora a maioria dos participantes prescrevesse IBPs regularmente e para fins de profilaxia, no entanto, não estava familiarizada com estratégias de prescrição e raramente revisava as indicações em andamento. O conhecimento suficiente está correlacionado com revisões recentes da literatura e afiliação à especialidade médica.

3.
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1535325

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) manifests with a constellation of common throat symptoms and inconclusive signs on laryngoscopic exam. It is a diagnosis, often made clinically, that can lead to prescriptions of proton pump inhibitors that are unnecessary and potentially harmful. Glottic insufficiency (GI) and the accompanying hyperfunctional laryngeal behaviors can also present with similar, common throat complaints that may or may not include a qualitative change to the voice. Methods: This is a reflection article. It is written to summarize, explain, and support with evidence the opinion of the author on the topic of how symptoms of voice disorders can easily be mistaken for symptoms of LPR. The offered reflection is based on his experience, research and the available literature. Reflection: This article intends to explore the similarities between GI and LPR, how to ultimately differentiate them and how to approach treatment with a broader differential diagnosis. Conclusion: LPR and GI can present with identical, vague throat, and voice symptoms. Empiric medication trials, behavioral interventions and objective laryngovideostroboscopy, impedance-based reflux, and esophageal motility testing may all be needed, sometimes in a trial and error fashion, to correctly diagnose and treat a patient's symptoms.


Introducción: El reflujo laríngeo-faríngeo (LPR, por sus siglas en inglés) se manifiesta con una serie de síntomas comunes en la garganta y signos no concluyentes en el examen larinoscópico. Es un diagnóstico que a menudo se realiza clínicamente y que puede llevar a la prescripción de inhibidores de la bomba de protones que son innecesarios y potencialmente perjudiciales. La insuficiencia glótica (IG) y los comportamientos laríngeos hiperfuncionales que la acompañan también pueden presentar síntomas de garganta comunes similares, que pueden o no incluir un cambio cualitativo en la voz. Métodos: Este es un artículo de reflexión. Está escrito para resumir, explicar y respaldar con evidencia la opinión del autor sobre cómo los síntomas de los trastornos de la voz pueden confundirse fácilmente con los síntomas del LPR. La reflexión ofrecida se basa en su experiencia, investigación y la literatura disponible. Reflexión: Este artículo tiene la intención de explorar las similitudes entre la IG y el LPR, cómo diferenciarlos finalmente y cómo abordar el tratamiento con un diagnóstico diferencial más amplio. Conclusión: El LPR y la IG pueden presentar síntomas idénticos y vagos en la garganta y la voz. Puede ser necesario realizar ensayos de medicación empírica, intervenciones conductuales y pruebas objetivas de laringovideostroboscopia, reflujo basado en impedancia y motilidad esofágica, a veces de manera experimental, para diagnosticar y tratar correctamente los síntomas de un paciente.

4.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-218123

ABSTRACT

Omeprazole, a Proton pump inhibitor, is widely prescribed in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux. Patients continue to use omeprazole for long period of time even without the supervision of the doctor. The authors report a 50-year-old male patient with a 5-year history of omeprazole use, who complained of chest discomfort. ECG on admission showed atrial fibrillation. Laboratory findings showed hypomagnesaemia, hypocalcaemia, and hypokalemia. The case report emphasizes the importance of patient education regarding the use and adverse drug reactions of the prescribed medications.

5.
Int. arch. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 27(2): 191-196, April-June 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1440217

ABSTRACT

Abstract Introduction Contact granulomas (CGs) and intubation granulomas (IGs) are known to have different clinical manifestations despite having the same pathological features. Objectives The purpose of the present study was to analyze the treatment results for CG and IG and to obtain clinical information. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with vocal process granuloma (VPG) between January 2015 and December 2018. The patient's age, sex, medical history, lesion size, lesion type, reflux finding score (RFS), response to treatment, duration of treatment, and follow-up period were compared. Results Eighteen patients with CG and 14 patients with IG were included in the study. The IG group had more female patients (p = 0.0009), showed better response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and steroid inhalation (SI) (p = 0.036), and had a shorter treatment period (p = 0.0029) than the CG group. Five patients who received botulinum toxin injections in their vocal cords had complete remission. Conclusions Compared with CG, IG was more responsive to treatment with PPI and SI and required a shorter duration of treatment.

6.
Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis ; (6): 683-688, 2023.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-991174

ABSTRACT

During the analysis of benziamidazole-class irreversible proton pump inhibitors,an unusual mass spectral response with the mass-to-charge ratio at[M+10]+intrigued us,as it couldn't be assigned to any literature known relevant structure,intermediate or adduct ion.Moreover,this mysterious mass pattern of[M+10]+has been gradually observed by series of marketed proton pump inhibitors,viz.omeprazole,pantoprazole,lansoprazole and rabeprazole.All the previous attempts to isolate the corresponding component were unsuccessful.The investigation of present work addresses this kind of signal to a pyridinium thiocyanate mass spectral intermediate(10),which is the common fragment ion of series of labile aggregates.The origin of such aggregates can be traced to the reactive intermediates formed by acid-promoted degradation.These reactive intermediates tend to react with each other and give raise series of complicated aggregates systematically in a water/acetonitrile solution by electrospray ioniza-tion.The structure of the corresponding pyridinium thiocyanate species of omeprazole(10a)has been eventually characterized with the help of synthetic specimen(10a').Our structural proposal as well as its origin was supported by in situ nuclear magnetic resonance,chemical derivatization and colorimetric experiments.

7.
Chinese Pediatric Emergency Medicine ; (12): 241-246, 2023.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-990507

ABSTRACT

Stress-related digestive tract mucosal disease is a common complication in pediatric intensive care unit(PICU). It may progress to stress ulcer and severe ulcer bleeding, which may lead to death.Currently, stress ulcer prophylaxis is recommended for critically ill children with high risk factors for stress ulcer, and the most commonly used acid suppression drugs are proton pump inhibitor and histamine-2 receptor antagonist.However, excessive prophylactic acid suppression is common and can increase the risk of hospital-acquired pneumonia and clostridium difficile infection in PICU.This review aimed to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of preventive acid suppressant therapy and promote the rational use of acid suppressant in PICU.

8.
China Pharmacy ; (12): 613-619, 2023.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-964775

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan (VPZ) for Helicobacter pylori (Hp) eradication therapy. METHODS Retrieved from The Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, CNKI, VIP and Wanfang database, randomized controlled trials about VPZ for Hp eradication therapy (trial group) versus proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (control group) were collected during the inception to July 2022. After data extraction and quality evaluation with bias risk assessment tool recommended by Cochrane System Evaluation Manual 5.1.0, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan5.3 software. RESULTS Nine studies with 2 134 patients were included. Compared with control group, the overall Hp eradication rate of trial group increased significantly in either the ITT analysis or PP analysis, being 87.5% vs. 76.2% [RR=1.14, 95%CI (1.06,1.21), P<0.001] and 92.4% vs. 80.5% [RR=1.11, 95%CI (1.03,1.21), P<0.01], respectively. According to ITT and PP analysis of primary treatment subgroup, compared with control group, the overall Hp eradication rate of trial group increased significantly, being 88.4% vs. 76.5% [RR=1.15, 95%CI (1.09,1.22), P<0.000 01] and 92.8% vs. 80.9% [RR=1.12, 95%CI(1.03,1.23), P< 0.05]; according to ITT and PP analysis of rescue therapy subgroup, there was no significant difference in the overall Hp eradication rate between control group and trial group (P>0.05). According to ITT and PP analysis of triple therapy subgroup, compared with control group, overall Hp eradication rate of trial group increased significantly, being 88.3% vs. 75.6% [RR=1.16, 95%CI (1.08, 1.25), P<0.000 1] and 92.6% vs. 77.6% [RR=1.15, 95%CI (1.04, 1.28), P<0.01]; according to ITT and PP analysis of quadruple therapy subgroup, there was no significant difference in the overall Hp eradication rate between control group and trial group (P>0.05). Compared with control group, the incidence of adverse events in trial group decreased significantly, being 34.2% vs. 40.9% [RR=0.84, 95%CI(0.70,0.99), P< 0.05]. There was no statistical significance in the incidence of serious adverse events between 2 groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Compared with PPI therapy, the efficacy of VPZ-based triple therapy is better, particularly in primary treatment patients. However, VPZ has no significant advantage in rescue treatment and bismuth-containing quadruple regimen. And the safety and tolerance of VPZ for Hp eradication therapy are well, even better than PPI.

9.
China Pharmacy ; (12): 1237-1241, 2023.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-973626

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE To explore the effects of posaconazole combined with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) on the blood concentration and the risk of invasive fungal disease (IFD) in patients with malignant hematological disorder. METHODS In accordance with the random number table method, 40 patients with malignant hematological disorders who were admitted to the hematology department of our hospital between December 2020 and December 2021 were chosen and divided into control group (20 cases) and observation group (20 cases). The control group received Posaconazole oral suspension alone, while the observation group received Posaconazole oral suspension combined with PPI. The incidence of IFD, attainment rate of blood concentration, the time from the start of prophylaxis to IFD onset, the fatality associated with IFD, treatment of infected patients, and blood concentrations of posaconazole on 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th day after posaconazole application were compared between 2 groups; the occurrence of adverse events during drug administration in the two groups was recorded. RESULTS The study was stopped because 2 patients in the observation group and 9 patients in the control group received hospital departures after taking posaconazole for fewer than 7 days. The incidence of IFD in the observation group was significantly higher than control group, and the attainment rate of blood concentration in the observation group was significantly lower than control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the time from the start of prophylaxis to IFD onset, the fatality associated with IFD, treatment of infected patients and the incidence of adverse events (P> 0.05). The blood concentration of posaconazole in the observation group was significantly lower than control group on 7th day of medication (P<0.05); there was no significant in blood concentration of posaconazole between 2 groups on the 14th day of medication (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Posaconazole combined with PPI can reduce the blood concentration of patients with malignant hematological disorders, increase the risk of IFD. Clinical practice should try to avoid the combination of the two or use them under the guidance of therapeutic drug monitoring.

10.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, CONASS, ColecionaSUS, SES-GO | ID: biblio-1426235

ABSTRACT

Tecnologia: Esomeprazol e lansoprazol. Indicação: Tratamento de doença do refluxo gastroesofágico em adultos. Pergunta: Esomeprazol e lansoprazol são mais eficazes e toleráveis que o omeprazol já incorporado ao SUS para o tratamento de Doença do Refluxo Gastroesofágico (DRGE) em adultos? Métodos: Uma revisão rápida de evidências, uma revisão de revisões sistemáticas, com levantamento bibliográfico realizado na base de dados PUBMED, utilizando estratégia estruturada de busca. A qualidade metodológica das revisões sistemáticas foi avaliada com AMSTAR-2 (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews). Resultados: Foram selecionadas três revisões sistemáticas com meta-análise, que atendiam aos critérios de inclusão. Conclusão: O esomeprazol era mais eficaz para cicatrização da lesão nos casos de esofagite erosiva, prevenção da mucosa do esôfago, maior controle de ácido no tratamento de curto prazo (4 e 8 semanas) de esomeprazol 40mg e tratamento de longo prazo (6 meses) de esomeprazol 20mg. A taxa de resposta no alívio dos sintomas, o esomeprazol 20mg e 40mg apresentou ser mais eficaz, especialmente, na azia e dor epigástrica. Quanto ao perfil de segurança, não houve diferença significativa entre as taxas de eventos adversos, todos medicamentos eram parecidos entre si


Technology: Esomeprazole and Lansoprazole. Indication: Treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults. Question: Are Esomeprazole and Lansoprazole more effective and tolerable than omeprazole already incorporated into SUS for the treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) in adults? Methods: A rapid review of evidence, an overview of systematic reviews, with bibliographic survey carried out in the PUBMED database, using a structured search strategy. The methodological quality of systematic reviews was assessed using AMSTAR-2 (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews). Results: Three systematic reviews with meta-analysis were selected, which met the inclusion criteria. Conclusion: Esomeprazole was more effective in achieving wound healing in cases of erosive esophagitis, prevention of esophageal mucosa, greater acid control in short-term treatment (4 and 8 weeks) of esomeprazole 40mg and long-term treatment (6 months) of esomeprazole 20mg. the response rate in symptom relief, esomeprazole 20mg and 40mg proved to be more effective, especially in heartburn and epigastric pain. As for the safety profile, there was no significant difference between the rates of adverse events, all drugs were similar to each other


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Young Adult , Omeprazole/therapeutic use , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Esomeprazole/therapeutic use , Lansoprazole/therapeutic use , Esophagitis/drug therapy , Comparative Effectiveness Research
11.
Dement. neuropsychol ; 17: e20220048, 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1439972

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT. Several recent studies have suggested an association between proton pump inhibitors and the development of cognitive changes. Objective: To assess the existence of this association. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted including guidelines, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, observational and experimental studies published between February 2011 and February 2021. Results: The initial research identified 393 articles, 28 of which were included: 8 systematic reviews, 1 clinical trial, 15 observational studies, 3 case-control studies, and 1 cross-sectional observational study. Conclusions: Most studies classified with the highest level of evidence found no statistically significant association between the use of proton pump inhibitors and the development of cognitive impairment or dementia.


RESUMO. Nos últimos anos, têm sido publicados vários estudos que indicam uma associação entre o uso de inibidores da bomba de protões e o desenvolvimento de alterações cognitivas. Objetivo: Avaliar a existência desta associação. Métodos: Foi realizada uma pesquisa bibliográfica abrangente, incluindo diretrizes, meta-análises, revisões sistemáticas, estudos experimentais e observacionais publicados entre fevereiro de 2011 e de 2021. Resultados: A pesquisa inicial identificou 393 artigos, dos quais 28 foram incluídos: 8 revisões sistemáticas, 1 ensaio clínico, 15 estudos observacionais, 3 estudos de caso-controle e 1 estudo observacional transversal. Conclusões: A maioria dos estudos com o maior nível de evidência não encontrou uma associação estatisticamente significativa entre o uso de inibidores da bomba de protões e o desenvolvimento de défice cognitivo ou demência.


Subject(s)
Humans
12.
Rev. gastroenterol. Peru ; 42(4)oct. 2022.
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1423948

ABSTRACT

Gastric-acid suppressants are one of the most frequently used classes of drugs worldwide. Several studies about their overprescribing have been carried out in recent years. The aim of the study was to assess the appropriateness of these drugs at an internal medicine service of a tertiary hospital in Venezuela. A retrospective record review of patients admitted to the internal medicine service from January 2020 to February 2021 was performed. Data about indications for gastric-acid suppressants, the type used, and their continuation at discharge were collected. The prescribing was grouped into two categories, appropriate or inappropriate, according to current clinical guidelines. Of the 1203 patients who were newly prescribed gastric-acid suppressants in hospital during the study period, 993 (82.5%) had an inappropriate prescription. Prophylaxis of peptic ulcers in low-risk patients was the most frequent no evidence-based indication (20.24%). Seven hundred sixty-two patients were discharged on gastric-acid suppressants. Of these, 74.7% did not have an acceptable indication to continue this treatment on an outpatient basis. Many hospitalized patients in a Venezuelan academic tertiary healthcare center were given gastric acid suppressants not in accordance with the current clinical practice guidelines.


Los supresores del ácido gástrico son uno de los grupos farmacológicos más frecuentemente prescritos en todo el mundo. En los últimos años se han realizado varios estudios sobre su prescripción inadecuada. El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar la idoneidad de estos medicamentos en un servicio de medicina interna de un hospital de tercer nivel en Venezuela. Se realizó una revisión retrospectiva de historias medicas de pacientes ingresados en el servicio de medicina interna desde enero de 2020 hasta febrero de 2021. Se recogieron datos sobre indicaciones de supresores de ácido gástrico, tipo utilizado y su continuación al alta. La prescripción se agrupó en dos categorías, adecuada o inadecuada, según las guías clínicas vigentes. Entre los 1203 pacientes a los que se les prescribió recientemente supresores de ácido gástrico en el hospital durante el período de estudio, 993 (82,5%) tenían una prescripción inapropiada. La profilaxis de úlceras pépticas en pacientes de bajo riesgo fue la indicación no basada en evidencia más frecuente (20,24%). Setecientos sesenta y dos pacientes fueron dados de alta con supresores de ácido gástrico. De estos, el 74,7% no tenía una indicación apropiada para continuar este tratamiento de forma ambulatoria. Un alto número de pacientes hospitalizados en un centro asistencial de nivel terciario en Venezuela fueron prescritos con supresores de ácido gástrico que no se ajustaban a las guías de práctica clínica vigentes.

13.
J Indian Med Assoc ; 2022 Jul; 120(7): 67-72
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-216573

ABSTRACT

Goal : This is a subjective survey to assess the knowledge, awareness, and practices (KAP) of physicians while prescribing Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) in acid peptic disorder (APD) patients in India. Background : APD represents a variety of gastric anomalies in which PPIs form the mainstay of management. Many of the APD patients are associated with comorbidities, resulting in polypharmacy and increased risk of drugdrug interactions. Therefore, it is essential that physicians be aware of PPI drug interactions while prescribing them to patients with comorbidities. In developing countries like India, studies assessing the KAP of Physicians are limited. Study Design : This questionnaire-based study consisted of 3 domains: (A) Study objectives and consent; (B) Participants’ socio-demographic details; (C) Questions on KAP of Physicians around various aspects of APD management and PPI usage. Results : A total of 110 Physicians completed the survey. 92% observed stress as the most common risk factor; Obesity (46), Diabetes Mellitus (41%) and Cardiovascular Disease (33%) as the most frequent comorbidities, in APD. Almost all Physicians (99%) considered patient’s comorbidity important while choosing PPI. 84% participants felt that anticoagulants when co-prescribed with PPI have higher chance of drug-drug interactions. 60% ranked Rabeprazole in the top, in terms of safety and tolerability among PPIs. Conclusion: The present study mapped the awareness of Indian Physicians on APD, PPI usage, their adverse effects, drug-drug interactions; patient compliance and satisfaction with PPIs. These findings can be used to plan future interventions targeting HCPs, to ensure safe and appropriate use of PPIs

14.
Arq. gastroenterol ; 59(2): 219-225, Apr.-June 2022. graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1383848

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are one of the most prescribed drugs in the world. Frequent use and long-term maintenance of these drugs drew the attention of researchers for sporadic adverse effects reports. Objective: The purpose of this narrative review is to discuss appropriate data and causality related to these adverse events and PPIs. Methods: A narrative review was conducted by systematizing information about safety and adverse events on PPIs from 2015 to 2020. A structured search on Pubmed was performed to identify systematic reviews and meta-analysis investigating the following situations: a) gastric cancer; b) micronutrients deficiency; c) acid rebound; d) infections; e) fractures; f) dementia; g) kidney disease; and h) sudden death and cardiovascular changes. Results: Recent studies have potentially associated PPIs with some adverse events as osteoporosis-related fractures. There are also reports of intestinal infections, including Clostridium difficile, besides poor vitamins absorption and minerals such as vitamin B12, magnesium, and iron. Furthermore, there are some dementia, pneumonia, kidney disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke reports. For kidney diseases, studies consistently suggest that the use of PPI may be associated with an increased risk of adverse kidney events, especially in the elderly, with long-term PPI use and pre-existing kidney disease. Another additional question is whether chronic PPI use would also lead to the onset of gastric cancer. The abrupt discontinuation of PPIs is also related to increased gastric acid production above pre-PPI treatment levels; this phenomenon is called acid rebound. Conclusion: The key to mitigate adverse effects is the rational use of PPIs at the lowest effective dose and in the shortest possible duration. Although these adverse effects have a potential clinical impact, their causal association is still subject to validation.


RESUMO: Contexto: Os inibidores da bomba de prótons (IBPs) são um dos medicamentos mais prescritos no mundo. O uso frequente e a manutenção a longo prazo dessas drogas chamaram a atenção dos pesquisadores devido aos relatos esporádicos de efeitos adversos. Objetivo: Esta revisão narrativa tem o objetivo de discutir os dados e a causalidade relacionada a esses eventos adversos e o uso de IBPs. Métodos: Uma revisão narrativa foi conduzida através da sistematização das informações sobre segurança e eventos adversos de IBPs de 2015 a 2020. Uma busca estruturada na base de dados PubMed foi realizada visando identificar revisões sistemáticas e meta-análises investigando as situações a seguir: a) câncer gástrico; b) deficiência de microelementos; c) acidez de rebote; d) infecções; e) fraturas; f) demência; g) doença renal; e h) morte súbita e alterações cardiovasculares. Resultados: Estudos recentes têm potencialmente associado IBPs a alguns eventos adversos, como fraturas relacionadas à osteoporose. Também há relatos de infecções intestinais, incluindo Clostridium difficile, além de má absorção de vitaminas e minerais como vitamina B12, magnésio e ferro. Além disso, há alguns relatos de demência, pneumonia, doença renal, infarto do miocárdio e acidente vascular cerebral. Na doença renal, os estudos sugerem consistentemente que o uso de IBPs pode estar associado a um risco aumentado de eventos renais adversos, especialmente em idosos, com o uso de IBPs a longo prazo e doença renal preexistente. Outra questão adicional é se o uso crônico de IBPs também levaria ao aparecimento de câncer gástrico. A descontinuação abrupta de IBPs também está relacionada ao aumento da produção de ácido gástrico acima dos níveis de tratamento pré-IBPs; este fenômeno é conhecido como rebote ácido. Conclusão: A chave para mitigar esses efeitos adversos é o uso racional de IBPs na menor dose efetiva e com a menor duração possível. Embora esses efeitos adversos tenham um impacto clínico potencial, sua associação causal ainda está pendente de uma validação.

15.
Rev. med. Risaralda ; 28(1): 127-137, ene.-jun. 2022.
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1389149

ABSTRACT

Resumen El espectro de enfermedades asociadas con la deficiencia de la vitamina B 12 es amplio y abarca desde la ausencia de síntomas hasta el síndrome de malabsorción, insuficiencia medular, o síntomas neurológicos acompañados de parestesias, mielopatía o neuropatía. Existe evidencia sugestiva que indica que el empleo de inhibidores de bomba de protones (IBP) a largo plazo puede disminuir los niveles séricos de vitamina B12. Igualmente, estudios previos han asociado el déficit de vitamina B 12 a consumo en dosis altas de metformina, sin embargo, el mecanismo por el cual se genera la descompensación no está claro. Se ha llegado a describir una asociación aditiva de la administración de inhibidores bomba de protones/ Antagonistas receptor Histamina - 2 y metformina, sugiriendo que promueven la malabsorción de Vitamina B 12. Ambas categorías de medicamentos son ampliamente utilizadas, y en muchos casos sin prescripción médica, y su uso no debería ser pasado por alto. Cuando están clínicamente indicados, su uso debería ser monitorizado debido a la posibilidad de malabsorción de vitamina B 12 y sus consecuencias. Por tanto, en este artículo se revisan aspectos generales sobre la vitamina B12 y el estado del arte sobre la deficiencia de vitamina B12 en pacientes con consumo de metformina o uso de inhibidor de bomba de protones.


Abstract The spectrum of diseases associated with vitamin B12 deficiency is broad, ranging from no symptoms to malabsorption syndrome, spinal cord injury, neurological symptoms accompanied by paresthesia, myelopathy, or neuropathy. There is suggestive evidence that long-term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can lower serum levels of vitamin B12. Additionally, previous studies have associated vitamin B12 deficiency with high doses consumption of metformin; however, the mechanism in which this occurs is not clear. An additive association between the administration of proton pump inhibitors / Histamine H2 receptor antagonists, and metformin has been described, which suggest that these promote vitamin B12 malabsorption. Both categories of drugs are widely used, in many cases without a prescription, and its use should not be overlooked. When clinically indicated, their use should be monitored in view of the possibility of vitamin B12 malabsorption and its consequences. This article aims to review general aspects of vitamin B12 and delve into the state of the art regarding vitamin B12 deficiency in patients with metformin and / or proton pump inhibitor consumption.

16.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-217519

ABSTRACT

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are most commonly prescribed medications in the world which are highly effective drugs in treatment of upper gastrointestinal disorders, but there are concerns regarding its long term use. Aim and Objective: To assess the pattern of reported adverse drug reactions (ADR) in patients with long term use of PPI and to estimate the frequency of adverse drug effects. Materials and Methods: A study conducted as an observational study among 100 consecutive patients who attended the medical-gastro inpatient and outpatient department on treatment with PPI for more than 4 months, according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. After attaining the written informed consent, data regarding patient’s demographic details, occupational status, addictions, co-morbidities, and lab investigations were recorded in pre-prepared proforma after interviewing the patient and referring the case sheet. Details including PPI used and per day dose of the drug with any ADR developed were noted. Data collected were analyzed using appropriate statistical method. Categorical variables are expressed as frequency (percentage) and continuous variables as mean (standard deviation). Chi-square test was used to find out the association between PPI and ADR. Results: Out of 100 study participants, 57% case reported ADR which included 19 cases (33.3%) of hypomagnesemia, 8 cases (14%) each of hypocalcemia, and hyperkalemia, 7 cases (12.3%) of anemia, and 5 cases (8.9%) of acute kidney injury. Out of the 57 reported adverse events, 29 (50.9%) were caused by Rabeprazole followed by 18 (31.6%) by Pantoprazole, then Esomeprazole: 8 (14%), and least by Omeprazole (3.5%). Conclusion: Long-term use of PPI can lead to various ADR which requires the withdrawal of drug. Since PPIs are easily available without prescriptions, self-medication with PPIs are increasing alarmingly. With every antibiotic one PPI is always prescribed, as a result, there is irrational use of PPIs which is of concern and requires attention. These adverse events could be reduced by preventing self-medication of long duration and reducing the irrational prescribing of PPIs. Doctors should be sensitized about the ADRs. The patient should be educated about the long-term adverse effects of PPIs.

17.
Rev. Assoc. Méd. Rio Gd. do Sul ; 66(1): 01022105, 20220101.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1424942

ABSTRACT

Introdução: Sendo a metformina um dos principais tratamentos para o Diabetes Mellitus, torna-se necessário verificar seus efeitos colaterais. A redução nos níveis de vitamina B12 está entre os causadores de consequências importantes na população. Este estudo objetivou determinar o nível de vitamina B12 em usuários e não usuários de metformina de um ambulatório de geriatria no sul de Santa Catarina e avaliar fatores que possam interferir no nível desta vitamina. Métodos: Caracteriza-se como pesquisa quantitativa, observacional, retrospectiva, com coleta de dados secundários. Foram incluídos na pesquisa pacientes idosos com níveis de vitamina B12 documentados em prontuário e excluídos prontuários com ausência de dados e pacientes que fazem suplementação da vitamina. Após a seleção, foram analisados 131 prontuários de pacientes atendidos no período de 2016 e 2017 no Ambulatório de Geriatria das Clínicas Integradas de Saúde da Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense. Resultados: Dos pacientes que possuem deficiência de vitamina B12, 26,4% fazem uso de metformina. Dos pacientes que usam metformina, 36,8% possuem deficiência de vitamina B12. No uso de IBP, 39,6% apresentaram deficiência, e naqueles em uso concomitante de metformina e IBP, 9,4% apresentaram deficiência da vitamina. Conclusão: Apesar dos testes estatísticos não apresentarem associação estatisticamente significativa entre o uso de metformina e a deficiência de vitamina B12, os dados do presente estudo mostraram prevalência de deficiência da vitamina na amostra (40,4%). Sugere-se que isso é uma consequência importante da droga e mostra a necessidade de novos estudos na deficiência da vitamina e as suas consequências.


Introduction: As metformin is one of the main treatment options for diabetes mellitus, it is necessary to analyze its side effects. A reduction in B12 levels is one of the causes of important consequences to the population. This study aimed to determine B12 levels in patients who used metformin and those who did not in a geriatric outpatient clinic in southern Santa Catarina, assessing factors that could interfere with the levels of this vitamin. Methods: This is a quantitative, observational, retrospective study, with secondary data collection. We included older patients with B12 levels registered in their medical records and excluded records with missing data and patients who did vitamin replacement. After patient selection, we analyzed 131 medical records of patients seen between 2017 and 2017 at the geriatric outpatient clinic of Clínicas Integradas de Saúde, at Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense. Results: Among patients with B12 deficiency, 26.4% used metformin. Out of those using metformin, 36.8% had vitamin B12 deficiency. Among those who used proton-pump inhibitors (PPI), 39.6% had a vitamin deficiency, and considering those who simultaneously used metformin and PPI, 9.4% had a vitamin deficiency. Conclusion: Although statistical tests did not identify a statistically significant association between metformin use and vitamin B12 deficiency, our data showed a prevalence of vitamin deficiency in our sample (40.4%). We suggest that this could be an important consequence of this medication and highlight the need for new studies on B12 deficiency and its consequences.


Subject(s)
Vitamin B 12
18.
Medicina UPB ; 41(1): 61-66, mar. 2022. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS, COLNAL | ID: biblio-1362698

ABSTRACT

Los inhibidores de la bomba de protones (IBP) se encuentran entre los medicamentos más utilizados en el mundo por su bajo costo, extensa prescripción y efectividad. Sin embargo, su uso a largo plazo no es inocuo y aún hay vacíos en el conocimiento del empleo adecuado de estos medicamentos. Por lo tanto, en esta revisión se expone, además de sus propiedades generales, sus verdaderas indicaciones, el uso recomendado a largo plazo y las estrategias para lograr la deprescripción, con el fin de evitar el uso indiscriminado.


Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most widely used drugs in the world, due to their low cost, extensive prescription and effectiveness. However, its long-term use is not safe and there are still certain gaps in the knowledge of the proper use of these drugs. Therefore, this review aims to expose their general properties as well as their true indications, the appropriate long-term use and strategies to achieve adequate deprescription of these drugs, seeking to avoid indiscriminate use.


Os inibidores da bomba de prótons (IBP) se encontram entre os medicamentos mais utilizados no mundo pelo seu baixo custo, extensa prescrição e efetividade. Embora, seu uso a longo prazo não é inócuo e ainda há vazios no conhecimento do uso adequado destes medicamentos. Por tanto, nesta revisão se expõe, além das suas propriedades gerais, suas verdadeiras indicações, o uso recomendado ao longo prazo e as estratégias para conseguir a deprescrição, com o fim de evitar o uso indiscriminado.


Subject(s)
Humans , Proton Pump Inhibitors , Effectiveness , Prescriptions , Deprescriptions
19.
Medicina UPB ; 41(1): 67-74, mar. 2022. tab, Ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS, COLNAL | ID: biblio-1362702

ABSTRACT

La hemorragia del tracto digestivo superior (HTDS) es el sangrado originado por encima del ángulo de Treitz. A pesar del aumento en las estrategias de prevención, del incremento en los tratamientos con Inhibidor de bomba de protones (IBP) y de la intervención endoscópica temprana, esta patología sigue siendo una causa frecuente de consulta a urgencias, con una morbimortalidad no despreciable y alta carga para el sistema de salud. Esta revisión se enfoca en la HTDS de causa diferente a las varices. La principal causante de esta entidad es la enfermedad ácido-péptica, que es consecuencia del gran consumo de antiinflamatorios no esteroideos (AINES) y de la infección por Helicobacter Pylori. Otras causas son el síndrome de Mallory Weiss, la esofagitis erosiva, las malformaciones arteriovenosas y la malignidad.


Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) refers to any bleeding originating above the angle of Treitz. Despite an increase in prevention strategies, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and early endoscopic intervention, this pathology continues to be an important cause of admission to the emergency department for gastrointestinal causes, having a pretty high morbidity and mortality in addition to a high burden on the health system. This review focuses on non-variceal UGIB. The main cause of this entity being peptic acid disease, due to great consumption of NSAIDs and Helicobacter Pylori infection. Other causes are Mallory Weiss syndrome, erosive esophagitis, arteriovenous malformations, and malignancy.


A hemorragia do trato digestivo superior (HTDS) é o sangrado originado acima do ângulo de Treitz. Apesar do aumento nas estratégias de prevenção, do incremento nos tratamentos com Inibidor da bomba de prótons (IBP) e da intervenção endoscópica precoce, esta patologia segue sendo uma causa frequente de consulta a urgências, com uma morbimortalidade não depreciável e alta carga para o sistema de saúde. Esta revisão se enfoca na HTDS de causa diferente às varizes. A principal causante desta entidade é a doença ácido-péptica, que é consequência do grande consumo de anti-inflamatórios não esteróideos (AINES) e da infecção por HelicobacterPylori. Outras causas são a síndrome de Mallory Weiss, a esofagites erosiva, as malformações arteriovenosas e a malignidade. Palavras-chave: hemorragia gastrointestinal; úlcera péptica; endoscopia gastrointestinal; inibidores da bomba de prótons; medicina geral.


Subject(s)
Humans , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage , Peptic Ulcer , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Helicobacter pylori , Gastrointestinal Tract , Emergency Service, Hospital , Esophagitis , Proton Pump Inhibitors , Mallory-Weiss Syndrome , Neoplasms
20.
Chinese Journal of Geriatrics ; (12): 1419-1423, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-993747

ABSTRACT

In 2022, the American Gastroenterological Association(AGA)published an expert consensus on the AGA's clinical practice update on PPI prescription cancellation in the Journal of Gastroenterology.In view of the excessive and unreasonable use of proton pump inhibitors(PPIs), experts were organized to formulate a set of ten practical suggestions on how to guide outpatient patients to reduce and stop using PPI.Based on the current situation of PPI use in China and the needs of clinical practice, this paper interpreted the consensus from the perspective of pharmacists, so as to provide reference for further regulating the rational use of PPI and reducing the excessive use and adverse reactions of PPI.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL