ABSTRACT
Objective:To compare the efficacy between Multiloc humeral intramedullary nail system (Multiloc) and proximal humerus internal locking system (PHILOS) in the treatment of adult proximal humeral fractures.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted of the 83 adult patients with proximal humeral fracture who had been treated at Trauma Center, The Second People's Hospital of Changzhou from August 2018 to March 2021. They were 33 males and 50 females, with 45 left sides and 38 right sides injured. By the Neer classification, there were 48 two-part, 22 three-part and 13 four-part fractures. The patients were assigned into 2 groups according to different treatments: an observation group ( n=41) receiving treatment by Multiloc and a control group ( n=42) receiving treatment by PHILOS. The 2 groups were compared in terms of humeral neck shaft angles and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores preoperation and one month postoperation, Neer shoulder function score at the last follow-up, and incidence of adverse reactions. Results:The preoperative general data showed no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups, indicating the groups were comparable ( P>0.05). The humeral neck shaft angle (127.4°±3.6°) was recovered significantly better and the VAS pain score (1.3±0.3) was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (129.6°±4.5°,2.1±0.3) one month after operation ( P<0.05). The excellent to good rate by Neer score at the last follow-up (90.24%, 37/41) was significantly higher and the incidence of adverse reactions (2.44%) significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (71.43%, 30/42 and (19.05%, 8/42) ( P<0.05). Conclusion:In the treatment of adult proximal humeral fractures, compared with PHILOS, the Multiloc system is more effective in improving shoulder joint function, promoting shoulder motion recovery and reducing pain.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The medial column fracture of the proximal humeral fracture is a type of fracture with high postoperative complications after internal fixation. Proximal humeral internal locking system is widely used in the proximal humeral fracture. The biomechanical stability of two different internal fixation models for the treatment of the poor medial column support proximal humeral fractures with proximal humeral internal locking system and proximal humeral intemal locking system with fibular allograft augmentation is still unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the biomechanical stability of the proximal humeral internal locking system and proximal humeral internal locking system with fibular allograft augmentation in the poor medial column support proximal humeral fracture with finite element analysis, and to compare the difference in fixation modes in humeral calcar supporting screws under different fixing methods. METHODS: The proximal CT data of osteoporosis were obtained. According to the 5-mm osteotomy of the humerus, the posterior medial column of the humerus was established and divided into two groups. Group A was the proximal humeral intemal locking system plate group, in which the A1 group was placed in the proximal end of the plate, the A2 group was the E screw missing, the A3 group was the D screw missing; the B group received the proximal humeral intemal locking system plate combined with fibular allograft augmentation, and all screws was placed in the proximal end of the plate in the B1 group. In the B2 group, E screw was missing; in the B3 group, D screw was missing. The three-dimensional finite element method was used to analyze the biomechanical stability of different groups of models under indirect violence. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) In terms of structural stability, B group was significantly better than A group. The structural stability of A1 group and A3 group of A group was comparable and better than that in A2 group. In B group, the structural stability of B1 group and B2 group was comparable and superior to B3 group. (2) For the poor medial column support proximal humeral fracture, the mechanical stability of the proximal humeral intemal locking system plate combined with fibular allograft augmentation was better than that of the proximal humeral internal locking system plate alone. When the fibular support was combined, the screw placement in the proximal end of the plate is optimal, and D screw has an important stabilizing effect on the support of the poor medial column support proximal humeral fracture.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the clinic efficacy of proximal humeral internal locking system(PHILOS) in the treatment of Neer Ⅱ and Ⅲ proximal humeral fractures.Methods From January 2013 to December 2015,a total of 47 patients with Neer Ⅱ and Ⅲ proximal humeral fractures was treated with PHILOS fixation in our hospital.The operative time,blood loss in operation,hospital stay,complications,Constant scores and radiography films were retrospectively analyzed.Results All 47 patients were followed up for an average of (19.2 ±9.6) month.The average operative time,the level of average intraoperative blood loss,the mean hospitalization time and the complication rate were(95.6 ±43.1) min,(108 ± 41.6) mL,(11.3 ±3.2) d and 14.7 ％ respectively.The Constant score was improved from(21.74 ± 8.24) preoperatively to(82.83 ± 7.21) at the last follow-up,and the difference was statistically significant(t=-36.57,P＜0.01).Conclusion Fixation with PHILOS is a safe and effective treatment for patients with Neer Ⅱ and Ⅲ proximal humeral fractures.