ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:Now, domestic total knee arthroplasty surgeries mainly use medial parapatel ar approach, with the disadvantages of large trauma and slower recovery. The quadriceps sparing approach is more accorded with normal anatomy, which can keep the knee extension system intact. The clinical comparison between quadriceps sparing approach and medial parapatel ar approach is rare. OBJECTIVE:To compare the early effect of total knee arthroplasty through quadriceps sparing approach and medial parapatel ar approach. METHODS:From January 2009 to January 2010, 55 patients (70 knees) were randomly divided into quadriceps sparing approach group (n=26, 35 knees) and medial parapatel ar approach group (n=29, 35 knees). Patients in two groups received total knee arthroplasty through quadriceps sparing approach and medial parapatel ar approach respectively. The incision length, operative time, postoperative drainage volume, additional amount of etoricoxib tablets, pain degree, straight leg raising time, start walking time, hospitalization time, range of motion of knee joint, Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score, radiographic alignment of al components and complications were compared between two groups. Al the prostheses used in this study were the Sigma type prostheses provided by the rotation platform of Johnson&Johnson Company. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Al the patients were fol owed-up for 12-24 months without infections, deep vein thrombosis, neurovascular injury, prosthesis instability, prosthesis loosening or displacement. Position of al the prostheses was normal in patients. The operative time in the quadriceps sparing approach group was longer than that in the medial parapatel ar approach group (P=0.00), while the incision length, postoperative drainage volume, additional amount of etoricoxib tablets, visual analog scale, straight leg raising time, start walking time, hospitalization time, range of motion of knee joint at 3 days after replacement and Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score in the quadriceps sparing approach group were better than those in the medial parapatel ar approach group (Psignificant differences in range of motion of knee joint at 3 days after replacement and Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score between two groups. The early effect of total knee arthroplasty through quadriceps sparing approach is better than the medial parapatel ar approach, and there is no significant difference in prosthesis alignment between two methods.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiological results of quadriceps-sparing total knee arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 50 consecutive total knee arthroplasties with a quadriceps-sparing surgical technique and 50 consecutive total knee arthroplasties with conventional surgical techniques were performed. The same surgeon performed all the operations with the same type of prosthesis (Nexgen LPS-flex Total Knee System). We compared the differences between these groups in terms of preoperative and postoperative femorotibial angles, tibial component alignment angles, tibial component inclinations, and ratios of size of the tibia component to tibial cutting size. RESULTS: There were no differences in preoperative femorotibal angles, tibial component alignment angles, tibial component inclinations, ratios of sizes of tibia tray to tibial cutting size, and blood loss between the two groups (p>0.05). The average ranges of motion and HSS scores at 8 weeks postoperatively in the quadriceps-sparing total knee arthroplasty group were greater than those in the conventional surgical technique (p<0.05). The mean postoperative femorotibial angle in the quadriceps-sparing total knee arthroplasty group was a valgus of 6.9+/-1.3 degrees compared with a valgus of 7.7+/-1.4 degrees in the standard arthroplasty group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: A quadriceps-sparing total knee arthroplasty offers predictable results in terms of radiological comparison with the conventional arthroplasty technique. But this technique has the tendency of producing a decreased valgus angle at the distal femur.