Clinical observation of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids for outlet obstructive constipation caused by rectocele / 临床外科杂志

Objective To investigate the clinical effectiveness of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids(PPH)in the treatment of outlet obstructive constipation caused by moderate and severe recto-cele. Methods A total of 48 patients with moderate or severe rectocele were treated with PPH. Patients were followed up for 4 ~ 6 months. The preoperative and postoperative parameters from rectoanal manome-try were compared and analyzed. Results After the surgery,patients had loose stool for 1 ~ 2 times a day. Sense of defecation obstruction in all patients was obviously improved. After the surgery,there were no significant changes in rectum resting pressure,anal resting pressure and various rectal sensitivity( P >0. 05). However,the decrease of inside rectal pressure and residual anal pressure were significantly re-duced(P < 0. 05). Conclusion The subjective defecation feeling of postoperative patients with PPH is unblock. Objective results of rectoanal manometry is clearly improved and the function of the rectum and anal canal is obviously restored.

Features of anorectal manometry in patients with rectocele / 中华消化杂志

Objective To assess the anal and pelvic floor function in patients with rectocele (RC),and to afford the evidence for the treatments of RC.Methods Patients with functional constipation (FC) and healthy controls were consecutively enrolled,and all the subjects underwent defecography and anorectal manometry.According to defecography,the subjects were divided into four groups as no RC,mild RC,moderate RC and severe RC.The t-test,analysis of variance,rank sum test and Chi-square test were performed to compare the results of anorectal manometry between different RC groups in FC patients,and the results of anorectal manometry between moderate RC group in FC patients and control group with moderate RC were also compared.Results A total of 54 FC patients and 17 healthy controls were enrolled.No RC was found in all of male subjects.Of 48 female patients with FC,nine cases (18.8％) had no RC,seven (14.6％) had mild RC,18(37.5％) had moderate RC,and 14(29.2％) had severe RC.Three of the 12 female controls had no RC,one had mild RC,and eight had severe RC.Among all female patients with FC,the defecation rectal pressure in severe RC group ((34.4 ± 14.2) mmHg,1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) was significantly higher than of no RC group ((20.8 ± 13.1) mmHg,t=3.663,P=0.001),mild RC group ((19.1± 15.1) mmHg,t=3.719,P＜0.01) and moderateRC group ((25.6±16.3) mmHg,t=2.525,P=0.010).The left rectal pressure after defecation in mild RC group ((55.1 ± 19.7) mmHg) was significantly higher than that of moderate RC group ((43.3±17.6) mmHg,t=2.507,P=0.019) and severe RC group ((40.0±20.9) mmHg,t=2.619,P=0.006).The anal relax ratio in mild RC group (3.0％,0.5％ to 25.5％) was significantly lower than that of moderate RC group (19.5％,10.0％ to 29.0％,Z=-2.583,P=0.010) and severe RC group (22.0％,7.3％ to 54.5％,Z=-2.830,P=0.005).There were no significant differences in rectal and anal resting pressure,anal squeezing pressure,rectal sensory threshold and constituent ratio of manometry among four groups (all P＞0.05).The left rectal pressure after defecation in FC patients with moderate RC ((43.3 ± 17.6) mmHg) was significantly higher than that of controls with moderate RC ((26.3±20.8) mmHg,t=2.997,P＜0.01),and anal relax ratio was significantly lower than that of controls with moderateRC ((23.4±20.2)％ vs (55.2±16.3)％,t=-5.266,P=0.008).Conclusions RC is found in female and also found in individuals with normal defecation.FC patients with mild RC lack enough anal relax during defecation.However,defecation is relatively coordinate in FC patients with severe RC,which indicates that severe RC may be part of manifestation of pelvic floor relaxation.

Postoperative rectoanal function in lower rectal carcinoma patients undergoing intersphincteric resection / 中华普通外科杂志

Objective To investigate the changes of rectoanal function after intersphincteric resection(ISR). Methods In this study,27 lower(3～5 cm from anal verge)rectal adenocarcinoma patients(T0-T2 determined by MRI and endoanal uhrasonography before surgery)undergoing intersphincteric resection between January2005 and January 2007 were followed up,their rectoanal function was assessed by rectoanal manometry 1 week preoperatively and 2 weeks,3 months,6 and 9 months postoperatively.The data were compared by using student t test and X2 test.Results For these 27 patients,within 3 months after surgery,the mean resting pressures(44±6)mm Hg to(19±3)mm Hg,maximum resting pressures(60±8)mm Hg to(33±4)mm Hg,squeezing pressures(180±19)mm Hg to(131±16)mm Hg and msximum tolerable volume(165±20)ml to(55±8)nd were decreased significantly(P＜0.05),and the rectoanal inhibitory reflexes(BAIR)were all absent;6 months after surgery,the resting pressures,squeezing pressures and maximum tolerable volume began to increase obviously,and 6 patients presented RAIR;3 months later the mean resting pressures,maximum resting pressures and squeezing pressures were(41±5)mm Hg,(57±8)mm Hg and(173±19)mm Hg respectively,close to the normal range(P＞0.05),though the maximum tolerable volume increased to(110±16)mi,still lower than the preoperative value(P=0.0153),11 patients restored BAIR.Conclusions The rectoanal function is injured obviously after intersphincteric resection within a short time period,but with time it was gradually restored.

Effects of the Electrical Stimulation for the Neurogenic Bowel according to the Level of Spinal Cord Injury

Objective: To evaluate the baseline colon transit time and rectoanal manometry and the effects of the electrical stimulation to the sacral dermatomes for the neurogenic bowel according to the level of spinal cord injury. METHOD: To determine the baseline differences, thirty three patients were classified into two groups: cord injured level above T9 and from T9 to L2. And thirteen patients were included in follow-up study to evaluate the effects of 4 weeks electrical stimulation. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the baseline colon transit time on two groups. After electrical stimulation, the left and rectosigmoid transit time was more improved in lower level injured group comparing with upper level injured group. In the rectoanal manometry the mean resting anal pressure, mean squeezing pressure, high pressure zone, and threshold of rectoanal inhibitory reflex were increased after the electrical stimulation on two groups. And the mean squeezing pressure on T9-L2 injured patients was significantly increased (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The elecrical stimulation to the sacral dermatomes increased the mean squeezing pressure of rectoanal manometry more significantly on the T9-L2 injured patients than the group of spinal cord injured level above T9. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the colon transit time before and after the electrical stimulation between two groups

Effects of the Electrical Stimulation for the Neurogenic Bowel of the Spinal Cord Injured Patients

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effects of the electrical stimulation to the sacral dermatomes for the neurogenic bowel of the spinal cord injured patients. METHOD: Eleven patients with cervical and thoracic cord injury were enrolled, and classified into two groups, control and electrical stimulation (ES) group. The colon transit time before and after electrical stimulation for 4 weeks to the sacral dermatomes were measured on the ES group, and measured at the same time on control group. The rectoanal manometries were performed after studies of colon transit time on the ES group. RESULTS: The colon transit time measured before electrical stimulation were 16.1+/-13.8 hours for the right colon; 20.1+/-23.3 hours for the left colon; 14.7+/-12.3 hours for the rectosigmoid colon; and the total transit time was 51.0+/-23.4 hours. The time of after electrical stimulation was 8.0+/-5.7 hours for the right colon; 12.8+/-2.2 hours for the left colon; 15.4+/-13.8 hours for the rectosigmoid colon; and the total transit time was 36.2+/-12.8 hours. The left colon transit time and total colon transit time before electrical stimulation were significantly improved compared to after electrical stimulation on the ES group (p<0.05). The left colon transit time of the ES group was significantly improved compared with control group (p<0.05). In the rectoanal manometry, the mean resting anal pressure and threshold of rectoanal inhibitory reflex were increased after the electrical stimulation. CONCLUSION: The electrical stimulation to the sacral dermatomes on the spinal cord injured patient could effectively enhance colon transit, especially on the left colon. In addition, muscular activity of the anal sphincter was enhanced.

ANORECTAL MANOMETRY IN IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME / 解放军医学杂志

To investigate fecal continence in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), studies were performed in 43 patients with IBS and 20 healthy subjects. Anorectal pressure was measured with BioLAB monitor of digestive tract and anorectal catheter with solid state manometric transducers. The results were analyzed by computation programs of American Sandhill Company. The sensation of defecation volume (DSV),sensation of defecation urgent volume (DUSV) and maximal tolerable volume (MTV) in the patients with diarrhea predominant type IBS (Dp-IBS) were significantly lower than healthy subjects (P