Treatment Outcomes after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Large Superficial Rectosigmoid Colon Tumors / 대한소화기내시경학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of a colorectal tumor is technically difficult. This study aimed to analyze the clinical outcomes of superficial large rectosigmoid tumors after ESD. METHODS: Medical records of 15 patients with large rectosigmoid tumors (more than 30 mm), in which ESD performed, were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: The mean tumor size was 42.5+/-14.3 mm (range, 30~78 mm). A histological examination revealed a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma in five cases (33.3%), adenoma with high-grade dysplasia in six cases (40%), and low-grade dysplasia in four cases (26.7%). The mean procedural time was 90.5+/-60.7 min (range, 22~246 min). The en bloc resection rate was 86.7%, and the complete resection rate 100%. The lateral resection margin was positive in four cases (26.6%), but no cases with a positive vertical margin were observed. Bleeding occurred in three cases (20%), and all were treated successfully using endoscopic measures. Perforations occurred in three cases (20%); two cases were treated by clipping and the other by a laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: ESD is a treatment option for superficial large rectosigmoid tumors. Further studies with larger cases and a longer term follow-up are needed to establish the efficacy and safety of ESD for colorectal tumors.

Rupture of the rectosigmoid colon with evisceration of the small bowel through the anus

Spontaneous rupture of the rectosigmoid colon and herniation of the small intestine through the rupture site and eventual evisceration through the anus is a very rare event. In the literature, only 42 cases have been reported. The majority of them occurred in patients with rectal prolapse and one case was reported in association with a third-degree uterine prolapse. We experienced an 81-year-old female patient with rectal prolapse and second-degree uterine prolapse complicated by spontaneous perforation of the rectosigmoid colon and anal evisceration of the small intestine. Segmental resection of the nonviable small intestine, primary repair of the ruptured rectosigmoid colon, and sigmoid loop colostomy were performed, and the patient recovered well. In our patient, both rectal and uterine prolapses cooperatively damaged the anterior wall of the rectosigmoid colon and resulted in perforation. So, rectal and uterine prolapses should be treated before the complication develops. In this patient, uterine prolapse should be treated because of the recurrence of this rare episode.

Clinicopathologic comparison of eroded polypoid hyperplasia and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome

We experienced two unusual cases of tumor-like polypoid lesions involving the rectosigmoid colon. They could not be readily classified into any well known polypoid tumors of the rectosigmoid colon, but appeared to have some similarities to the previously documented "eroded polypoid hyperplasia (EPH)". A collective review of our seven cases of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS), which proved to be due to paradoxically over-reactive muscle tone of the puborectalis, was performed, and clinicopathologic comparisons between EPH and SRUS were carried out. They shared histopathologic characteristics such as vascular congestion, crypt hyperplasia, and eroded surface, but they were different from each other in clinical symptoms, location of lesions and gross features. Furthermore, in one EPH case there was an altered much profile which was similar to that seen in SRUS and complete rectal prolapse. Conceivably, the pathological features of both EPH and SRUS were thought to have a possible connection with mucosal prolapse syndrome (MPS). Considering that MPS is a group of diseases encompassing SRUS and the related disorders of the colorectum and the anus, it is speculated that EPH of the rectosigmoid colon might be the proximal analogue of SRUS, a mucosal prolapse of the more distal colon.

roded Polypoid Hyperplasia of the Rectosigmoid Colon: Report of 2 cases with special reference to its relation to mucosal prolapse syndrome

Polypoid prolapse of mucosal folds can occur at various sites and in various conditions predominantly associated with strain during defecation. There are two well known types of mucosal prolapse syndrome(MPS), the inflammatory cloacogenic polyp(ICP) and the mucosal redundant polyp associated with diverticular disease(N4RPD). ICP is a mucosal prolapse of the anorectal junction and MRPD is a proximal analogue involving the sigmoid colon. We experienced two cases of eroded polypoid hyperplasia(EPH) of the rectosigmoid colon which manifested as a huge gyriform mass simulating the gross features of gastrointestinal lymphomas or other malignant tumors. The EPH consisted of confluent polypoid mucosal folds with rolled-up submucosa to form stalk, The polypoid lesion represented hyperplastic epithelium, erosion of the mucosal surface and congestive vascular ectasia of lamina propria and submucosa. To explain the whole morphologic features, the initial phenomenon should be the mucosal prolapse. Vascular stretching with ischemic erosion of the mucosal surface and compensatory epithelial hyperplasia ensue as the result. The ominous endoscopic and gross features of EPH should be kept in mind to avoid erroneous radical surgery.